An equilibrium model of how regulative and normative institutions influence micro-economic and organizational behavior

This paper investigates how pre-existing institutions foster economic development through trade. A non-cooperative game-theoretic model is proposed that combines three strands of social science: economics, political science, and sociology. Idealized market participants follow rational decision theory within a reward structure that embodies two types of institutions. Regulative institutions operate on threat of punishment, and normative institutions on perceptions of what is good and right. This composite model allows a more quantitative analysis of the question, raised by Douglas North, of how societies diverge from the efficient state predicted by classical micro-economics. The main finding is that value can be created by different types of institution even when they are imperfect, and the range of minimum–maximum effectiveness varies with the types of economic transactions that are technologically possible. It is hoped that further refinements of the model will yield greater understanding of how the success of societies and organizations can be predicted by a few simple rules.

[1]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[2]  Nikolaus Beck,et al.  The Institutions of the Market , 2008 .

[3]  William S. Neilson A theory of kindness, reluctance, and shame for social preferences , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[4]  S. Keen Standing on the toes of pygmies : why econophysics must be careful of the economic foundations on which it builds , 2003 .

[5]  Efe A. Ok Utility Representation of an Incomplete Preference Relation , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[6]  Institutional quality and poverty measures in a cross-section of countries , 2000 .

[7]  M. Olson Power And Prosperity: Outgrowing Communist And Capitalist Dictatorships , 1999 .

[8]  W. Scott Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests , 2007 .

[9]  T. Skocpol,et al.  States and social revolutions : a comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China , 1979 .

[10]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[11]  J. Pfeffer Leadership BS: Fixing Workplaces and Careers One Truth at a Time , 2015 .

[12]  Randolph M. Siverson,et al.  An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[13]  A. Greif Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  K. Kułakowski The norm game: punishing enemies and not friends , 2009 .

[15]  Herschel I. Grossman The state: Agent or proprietor? , 2000 .

[16]  R. Axelrod More Effective Choice in the Prisoner's Dilemma , 1980 .

[17]  J. Bull,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 2004, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[18]  Mancur Olson,et al.  The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. , 1984 .

[19]  H. Simon,et al.  A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. , 1990, Science.

[20]  A. Greif Reputation and Coalitions in Medieval Trade: Evidence on the Maghribi Traders , 1989, The Journal of Economic History.

[21]  S. Sunder Determinants of Economic Interaction: Behavior or Structure , 2006 .

[22]  James A. Robinson,et al.  Why nations fail ? The origins of Power , Prosperity and Poverty , 2015 .

[23]  M. Olson,et al.  A Not-so-dismal Science: A Broader View of Economies and Societies , 2000 .

[24]  Mauro Gallegati,et al.  Complex agent-based macroeconomics: a manifesto for a new paradigm , 2010 .

[25]  Hogg,et al.  Dynamics of computational ecosystems. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[26]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[27]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[28]  R. Boyd,et al.  In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small- Scale Societies , 2001 .

[29]  J. Sobel,et al.  Department of Economics Working Paper University of Massachusetts Amherst Is Altruism Bad for Cooperation? Is Altruism Bad for Cooperation? , 2022 .

[30]  Mancur Olson,et al.  A Not-so-dismal Science , 2000 .

[31]  Petros G. Sekeris Endogenous elites: power structure and patron-client relationships , 2010 .

[32]  Janet L. Yellen Macroprudential Supervision and Monetary Policy in the Post-crisis World , 2011 .

[33]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[34]  C Athena Aktipis,et al.  Know when to walk away: contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  David G. Rand,et al.  Who Cooperates in Repeated Games: The Role of Altruism, Inequity Aversion, and Demographics , 2011 .

[36]  A. Greif Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade , 2006 .

[37]  Nikolaus Beck,et al.  The institutions of the market : organizations, social systems, and governance , 2008 .

[38]  Barry R. Weingast,et al.  Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History , 2009 .

[39]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[40]  Philip Selznick,et al.  The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community , 1992 .

[41]  M. Nowak,et al.  A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game , 1993, Nature.

[42]  Jay M. Shafritz,et al.  Classics of Organization Theory , 1992 .

[43]  D. Sornette,et al.  Quantitative determination of the level of cooperation in the presence of punishment in three public good experiments , 2006, physics/0610225.

[44]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  THE ROLE OF SOCIAL STRUCTURE IN THE MAINTENANCE OF COOPERATIVE REGIMES , 2001 .

[45]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  The evolution of metanorms: quis custodiet ipsos custodes? , 2009, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[46]  Lawrence Lessig “Institutional Corruption” Defined , 2013, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.