Topology Insensitive Location Determination Using Independent Estimates Through Semi-Directional Antennas

We demonstrate the effect of using multiple estimations from independent single wireless motes in order to decrease network topology dependence on location estimation in a wireless sensor network. A method of determining the location of a target by using multiple compact semi-directional antennas is shown to give an independent estimate of location from each sensor mote in a network, each estimate not relying on the data from neighboring motes as in the case of traditional triangulation. We begin by demonstrating a method of using angular diversity through multiple semi-directional antennas in order to ascertain the location of a target. The estimation of both range and angle is demonstrated in the presence of a noisy and/or faded channel. An efficient and fast algorithm on a wireless sensor mote is presented through a Taylor series expansion of the simulated antenna pattern. Furthermore, using the results from the location estimation from a single node, location determination in a realistic network is explored through both theory and simulation. The results indicate that our proposed algorithm depends significantly less on the topology (spatial arrangement) of the anchor nodes. While network planning for a variety of topologies of anchor nodes is shown to be necessary when using triangulation, our proposed algorithm is insensitive to the deployments of the anchor nodes. A testbed was created in order to experimentally demonstrate that the predictions are accurate even in triangulation-adverse topologies. The experimental testbed shows that a linear arrangement of closely spaced sensors can reduce the location error to one-fourth of the location error using triangulation

[1]  S. Seidel,et al.  914 MHz path loss prediction models for indoor wireless communications in multifloored buildings , 1992 .

[2]  Saurabh Bagchi,et al.  Efficient collection of sensor data in remote fields using mobile collectors , 2004, Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX969).

[3]  Martin Vossiek,et al.  Wireless local positioning , 2003 .

[4]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  New analytical models and probability density functions for fading in wireless communications , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[5]  Andreas Willig,et al.  Protocols and Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005 .

[6]  O. Nelles,et al.  An Introduction to Optimization , 1996, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[7]  L. El Ghaoui,et al.  Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[8]  Gaetano Borriello Location Sensing Techniques , 2001 .

[9]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[10]  Saurabh Bagchi,et al.  Location Estimation in Ad Hoc Networks with Directional Antennas , 2005, 25th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS'05).

[11]  Saurabh Bagchi,et al.  Location tracking with directional antennas in wireless sensor networks , 2005, IMS 2005.

[12]  Cameron Whitehouse The Design of Calamari : an Ad-hoc Localization System for Sensor Networks , 2002 .

[13]  Martin Mauve,et al.  Position-based routing in ad hoc wireless networks , 2003 .

[14]  Matt Welsh,et al.  MoteTrack: A Robust, Decentralized Approach to RF-Based Location Tracking , 2005, LoCA.

[15]  K. Sarabandi,et al.  Physics based ray-tracing propagation model for suburban areas , 2003, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. Digest. Held in conjunction with: USNC/CNC/URSI North American Radio Sci. Meeting (Cat. No.03CH37450).

[16]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Ad-hoc localization using ranging and sectoring , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[17]  Seth J. Teller,et al.  The cricket compass for context-aware mobile applications , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[18]  M. Salazar-Palma,et al.  A survey of various propagation models for mobile communication , 2003 .