Dentate Gyrus Circuitry Features Improve Performance of Sparse Approximation Algorithms

Memory-related activity in the Dentate Gyrus (DG) is characterized by sparsity. Memory representations are seen as activated neuronal populations of granule cells, the main encoding cells in DG, which are estimated to engage 2–4% of the total population. This sparsity is assumed to enhance the ability of DG to perform pattern separation, one of the most valuable contributions of DG during memory formation. In this work, we investigate how features of the DG such as its excitatory and inhibitory connectivity diagram can be used to develop theoretical algorithms performing Sparse Approximation, a widely used strategy in the Signal Processing field. Sparse approximation stands for the algorithmic identification of few components from a dictionary that approximate a certain signal. The ability of DG to achieve pattern separation by sparsifing its representations is exploited here to improve the performance of the state of the art sparse approximation algorithm “Iterative Soft Thresholding” (IST) by adding new algorithmic features inspired by the DG circuitry. Lateral inhibition of granule cells, either direct or indirect, via mossy cells, is shown to enhance the performance of the IST. Apart from revealing the potential of DG-inspired theoretical algorithms, this work presents new insights regarding the function of particular cell types in the pattern separation task of the DG.

[1]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  Richard G Baraniuk,et al.  More Is Less: Signal Processing and the Data Deluge , 2011, Science.

[3]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Marco Idiart,et al.  A Second Function of Gamma Frequency Oscillations: An E%-Max Winner-Take-All Mechanism Selects Which Cells Fire , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  P. Tseng,et al.  Block Coordinate Relaxation Methods for Nonparametric Wavelet Denoising , 2000 .

[6]  E. Rolls,et al.  A computational theory of hippocampal function, and empirical tests of the theory , 2006, Progress in Neurobiology.

[7]  S. Frick,et al.  Compressed Sensing , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[8]  D. Amaral,et al.  The dentate gyrus: fundamental neuroanatomical organization (dentate gyrus for dummies). , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[9]  James J. Knierim,et al.  CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation , 2014, Neuron.

[10]  Diano F. Marrone,et al.  Disambiguating the similar: The dentate gyrus and pattern separation , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Majorization–Minimization Algorithms for Wavelet-Based Image Restoration , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  D. Kullmann,et al.  Oscillatory dynamics in the hippocampus support dentate gyrus–CA3 coupling , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  H. Scharfman The CA3 "backprojection" to the dentate gyrus. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[14]  E T Rolls,et al.  Computational constraints suggest the need for two distinct input systems to the hippocampal CA3 network , 1992, Hippocampus.

[15]  Dietmar Schmitz,et al.  Synaptic plasticity at hippocampal mossy fibre synapses , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Treves,et al.  What is the mammalian dentate gyrus good for? , 2008, Neuroscience.

[17]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[18]  H. Scharfman,et al.  A role for hilar cells in pattern separation in the dentate gyrus: A computational approach , 2009, Hippocampus.

[19]  H. Scharfman,et al.  Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus: A role for the CA3 backprojection , 2011, Hippocampus.

[20]  Arian Maleki,et al.  Optimally Tuned Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms for Compressed Sensing , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[21]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Interneurons of the hippocampus , 1998, Hippocampus.

[22]  Kenji Kohno,et al.  Hilar Mossy Cell Degeneration Causes Transient Dentate Granule Cell Hyperexcitability and Impaired Pattern Separation , 2012, Neuron.

[23]  M. Scanziani,et al.  Instantaneous Modulation of Gamma Oscillation Frequency by Balancing Excitation with Inhibition , 2009, Neuron.

[24]  T. Hafting,et al.  Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex , 2005, Nature.

[25]  P. Jonas,et al.  Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Moser,et al.  Pattern Separation in the Dentate Gyrus and CA3 of the Hippocampus , 2007, Science.

[27]  Emilio Kropff,et al.  Place cells, grid cells, and the brain's spatial representation system. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  K. Nakazawa,et al.  Hilar mossy cell circuitry controlling dentate granule cell excitability , 2013, Front. Neural Circuits.

[29]  I. Soltesz,et al.  Long-term plasticity in interneurons of the dentate gyrus , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  L. Acsády,et al.  Models, structure, function: the transformation of cortical signals in the dentate gyrus. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[31]  Panayiota Poirazi,et al.  A compressed sensing perspective of hippocampal function , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[32]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Erratum: Orthogonal micro-organization of orientation and spatial frequency in primate primary visual cortex , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Considerations arising from a complementary learning systems perspective on hippocampus and neocortex , 1996, Hippocampus.

[34]  C. Stark,et al.  Pattern Separation in the Human Hippocampal CA3 and Dentate Gyrus , 2008, Science.

[35]  Lucia M. Talamini,et al.  Recall of memory sequences by interaction of the dentate and CA3: A revised model of the phase precession , 2005, Neural Networks.

[36]  E. Rolls A computational theory of episodic memory formation in the hippocampus , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[37]  I. Daubechies,et al.  An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint , 2003, math/0307152.