Retrospective Benefit–Cost Analysis of Security-Enhancing and Cost-Saving Technologies

Abstract Research and development (R&D) planners in homeland security agencies would like to be able to prioritize investments in projects based on costs versus future safety and security benefits. While costs are often readily available, estimates of safety and security benefits are fraught with uncertainty. To address these challenges, a benefit–cost model of technological change is adapted to the homeland security context. Data are sparse; therefore, estimation is facilitated by developing a familiar linear welfare model using derivatives of cost and risk reduction functions to estimate areas of costs and benefits. The theoretical model is applied to two homeland security projects involving airport patrols and the assignment of U.S. federal air marshals to international flights. Retrospective data are available for most periods. Welfare-based rates of return are reported for the two cases, each of which is estimated to return large present value net benefits. Extensive sensitivity and Monte Carlo simulation explores uncertainties. Two important findings are that (i) given the rationality assumption, relative increases in security levels can be valued, even if the absolute level of security is not known; and (ii) large uncertainties about risk reduction exist but can be bounded by parametric sensitivity and uncertainty analysis.

[1]  Robert Haveman Water resource investment and the public interest , 1965 .

[2]  J. Giertz An experiment in public choice , 1974 .

[3]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations , 1977 .

[4]  A. Boardman,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice , 1996 .

[5]  Scott Farrow,et al.  THE ECONOMICS OF HOMELAND SECURITY EXPENDITURES: FOUNDATIONAL EXPECTED COST‐EFFECTIVENESS APPROACHES , 2007 .

[6]  William K. Bellinger Decision Rules , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[7]  Stuart Shapiro,et al.  The Benefit-Cost Analysis of Security Focused Regulations , 2009 .

[8]  Manish Jain,et al.  Software Assistants for Randomized Patrol Planning for the LAX Airport Police and the Federal Air Marshal Service , 2010, Interfaces.

[9]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Security and Game Theory: IRIS – A Tool for Strategic Security Allocation in Transportation Networks , 2011, AAMAS 2011.

[10]  Ralph L Keeney,et al.  A Value Model for Evaluating Homeland Security Decisions , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Security and Game Theory: Evaluating Deployed Decision-Support Systems for Security: Challenges, Analysis, and Approaches , 2011 .

[12]  Mark G. Stewart,et al.  Aviation security, risk assessment, and risk aversion for public decisionmaking | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2013 .

[13]  John Mueller,et al.  Terrorism Risks and Cost‐Benefit Analysis of Aviation Security , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Stackelberg Security Games ( SSG ) Basics and Application Overview , 2018 .

[15]  Melanie Hartmann,et al.  Design Of Water Resource Systems New Techniques For Relating Economic Objectives Engineering Analysis And Governmental Planning , 2016 .

[16]  James P. Howard, II A Note on Retrospective Social Discount Rates , 2017 .

[17]  A. Boardman,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2018 .

[18]  Arnold C. Harberger Triangles and all that , 2018 .

[19]  A. Rose,et al.  Welfare Analysis: Bridging the Partial and General Equilibrium Divide for Policy Analysis , 2018, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis.

[20]  Heather Rosoff,et al.  Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Homeland Security Research: A Risk‐Informed Methodology with Applications for the U.S. Coast Guard , 2019, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.