What’s “up”? Working memory contents can bias orientation processing

We explored the interaction between the processing of a low-level visual feature such as orientation and the contents of working memory (WM). In a first experiment, participants memorized the orientation of a Gabor patch and performed two subsequent orientation discriminations during the retention interval. The WM stimulus exerted a consistent repulsive effect on the discrimination judgments: participants were more likely to report that the discrimination stimulus was rotated clockwise compared to the oblique after being presented with a stimulus that was tilted anti-clockwise from the oblique. A control condition where participants attended to the Gabor patch but did not memorize it, showed a much reduced effect. The repulsive effect was stable across the two discriminations in the memory condition, but not in the control condition, where it decayed at the second discrimination. In a second experiment, we showed that the greater interference observed in the WM condition cannot be explained by a difference in cognitive demands between the WM and the control condition. We conclude that WM contents can bias perception: the effect of WM interference is of a visual nature, can last over delays of several seconds and is not disrupted by the processing of intervening visual stimuli during the retention period.

[1]  C. Clifford,et al.  A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals the content of visual short-term memory in the visual cortex , 2010, NeuroImage.

[3]  W Pieter Medendorp,et al.  Spatial updating across saccades during manual interception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Working Memory in Prefrontal Cortex of the Macaque , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[6]  Triesch Jochen.  Object perception is selectively slowed by a visually similar working memory load , 2008 .

[7]  G. Woodman,et al.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[9]  R Sekuler,et al.  Letter: Tilt aftereffect following very brief exposures. , 1974, Vision research.

[10]  N. Sutherland.  Figural After-Effects and Apparent Size , 1961 .

[11]  M. Coltheart.  Visual feature-analyzers and after-effects of tilt and curvature. , 1971, Psychological review.

[12]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  Sequential Estimation of Quantal Response Curves , 1963 .

[14]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[15]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  What are the units of storage in visual working memory? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[16]  M. Webster.  Adaptation and visual coding. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[17]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[18]  David Soto,et al.  The modulation of perceptual selection by working memory is dependent on the focus of spatial attention , 2010, Vision Research.

[19]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[20]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[21]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4 , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual working memory contaminates perception , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  S. Suzuki.  Attention-dependent brief adaptation to contour orientation: a high-level aftereffect for convexity? , 2001, Vision Research.

[25]  E. Vogel,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Working Memory Represents a Fixed Number of Items Regardless of Complexity , 2022 .

[26]  Christopher P Benton,et al.  The direction of measured face aftereffects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[27]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  J. R. Harris,et al.  TWO DIFFERENT AFTER-EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE TO VISUAL TILTS. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[29]  Guillaume A Rousselet,et al.  Inverting faces elicits sensitivity to race on the N170 component: a cross-cultural study. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[30]  David Soto,et al.  Working memory enhances visual perception: evidence from signal detection analysis. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Matteo Valsecchi,et al.  On altering motion perception via working memory-based attention shifts. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[32]  James W Bisley,et al.  Activity of neurons in cortical area MT during a memory for motion task. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  A. Baddeley.  Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  Svein Magnussen,et al.  Linear summation of tilt illusion and tilt aftereffect , 1980, Vision Research.

[36]  Diego Mendoza,et al.  Combined effects of feature-based working memory and feature-based attention on the perception of visual motion direction. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[37]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  S Magnussen,et al.  The psychophysics of perceptual memory , 1999, Psychological research.

[39]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Spatially Global Representations in Human Primary Visual Cortex during Working Memory Maintenance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  P. Downing,et al.  Interactions Between Visual Working Memory and Selective Attention , 2000, Psychological science.

[41]  R Over,et al.  Tilt aftereffects in central and peripheral vision. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  J. Maxwell,et al.  The role of prior exposure in the capture of attention by items in working memory , 2008 .

[43]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  R. Desimone,et al.  Activity of neurons in anterior inferior temporal cortex during a short- term memory task , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[45]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .