How Noise Contributes to Contrast Invariance of Orientation Tuning in Cat Visual Cortex

The width of the orientation tuning curves of the spike response of neurons in V1 is invariant to contrast. This property constrains the possible mechanisms underlying orientation selectivity. It has been suggested that noise circumvents the iceberg effect that would prevent contrast invariance in the purely feedforward mechanism. Here we investigate systematically how noise contributes to the contrast invariance of orientation tuning curves in V1. We study three models of increasing complexity: a simple threshold-linear firing rate model, a leaky integrate-and-fire model, and a conductance-based model. We show that the noise transmutes the threshold nonlinearity of the input–output relationships into an approximate power law without a threshold within some firing rate range. This implies that, under certain conditions which are derived here, the tuning of the neuron output is approximately contrast invariant. In particular we show that this mechanism for contrast invariance requires that the neuron firing rate must not be too large and that increasing or lowering the contrast too much destroys this invariance. We also show that if this mechanism operates in V1, the spike response, R, and average voltage response V of the neurons in V1 should vary with the contrast, C, according to R(C) ∝ V(C)γ. The exponent γ can be estimated from the amount by which the spike tuning curve is sharpened with respect to the voltage tuning curves of the neurons. This prediction does not depend on the specifics of the model and can be tested experimentally.

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  B Gluss,et al.  A model for neuron firing with exponential decay of potential resulting in diffusion equations for probability density. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[3]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single cells and behavior. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Henry C. Tuckwell,et al.  Introduction to theoretical neurobiology , 1988 .

[5]  C. Koch,et al.  Synaptic Background Activity Influences Spatiotemporal Integration in Single Pyramidal Cells. , 1991, The Biological bulletin.

[6]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Nonlinear Model of Neural Responses in Cat Visual Cortex , 1991 .

[7]  D. Heeger Nonlinear model of neural responses in cat visual cortex. , 1991 .

[8]  Idan Segev,et al.  The Impact of Parallel Fiber Background Activity on the Cable Properties of Cerebellar Purkinje Cells , 1992, Neural Computation.

[9]  D. Heeger Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[10]  Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Reduction of Conductance-Based Models with Slow Synapses to Neural Nets , 1994, Neural Computation.

[11]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Theory of orientation tuning in visual cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  S. Nelson,et al.  An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  P. Dirac The collected works of P.A.M. Dirac, 1924-1948 , 1996 .

[14]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[15]  Jean-Baptiste Lully,et al.  The collected works , 1996 .

[16]  R. Shapley,et al.  New perspectives on the mechanisms for orientation selectivity , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning in Cat Visual Cortex: Thalamocortical Input Tuning and Correlation-Based Intracortical Connectivity , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons , 1998, Nature.

[20]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Linking spontaneous activity of single cortical neurons and the underlying functional architecture. , 1999, Science.

[21]  D. Ferster,et al.  The contribution of noise to contrast invariance of orientation tuning in cat visual cortex. , 2000, Science.

[22]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Population Dynamics of Spiking Neurons: Fast Transients, Asynchronous States, and Locking , 2000, Neural Computation.

[23]  M. Carandini,et al.  Orientation tuning of input conductance, excitation, and inhibition in cat primary visual cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  D. Ferster,et al.  Neural mechanisms of orientation selectivity in the visual cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Effects of synaptic noise and filtering on the frequency response of spiking neurons. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[26]  K. Miller,et al.  Neural noise can explain expansive, power-law nonlinearities in neural response functions. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  O. Creutzfeldt,et al.  The representation of contrast and other stimulus parameters by single neurons in area 17 of the cat , 1984, Pflügers Archiv.

[28]  R. Freeman,et al.  Orientation selectivity in the cat's striate cortex is invariant with stimulus contrast , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  Traveling Waves and the Processing of Weakly Tuned Inputs in a Cortical Network Module , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[30]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  13 Modeling Feature Selectivity in Local Cortical Circuits , 2022 .