Geometric Complexity Theory -- Lie Algebraic Methods for Projective Limits of Stable Points

Let G be a connected reductive algebraic group over C, with Lie algebra G, acting rationally on a complex vector space V , and the corresponding projective space PV . Let x ∈ V and let H ⊆ G be its stabilizer and H ⊆ G, its Lie algebra. Our primary objective is to understand the points [y], and their stabilizers, which occur in the vicinity of [x] in PV . Towards this, we construct an explicit Lie algebra action of G on a suitably parametrized neighbourhood of x. As a consequence, we show that the Lie algebras of the stabilizers of points in the neighbourhood of x are parameterized by subspaces of H. When H is reductive, our results imply that these are in fact, Lie subalgebras of H. If the orbit of x were closed this would also follow from a celebrated theorem of Luna [Lun73]. To construct our Lie algebra action we proceed as follows. We identify the tangent space to the orbit Ox of x with a complement ofH in G. Let N be any linear subspace of V that is complementary to TOx, the tangent space to the orbit Ox. We construct an explicit map θ : V × N → V which captures the action of the nilpotent part of H on V . We show that the map θ is intimately connected with the local curvature form of the orbit at that point. We call this data, of a neighbourhood of x with the Lie algebra morphism from G to vector fields in this neighbourhood, a local model at x. The action of G on V extends to an action on P(V ). We illustrate the utility of the local model in understanding when [x] ∈ PV is in the projective orbit closure of [y] ∈ PV via two applications. The first application is when V = Sym(X), the space of forms in the variablesX := {x1, . . . , xk}. We consider a form f (as the “y” above) and elements in its orbit given by f(t) = A(t)·f , where A(t) is an invertible family in GL(X), with t ∈ C. We express f(t) as f(t) = tg + tfb + higher terms, with a < b. We call g ∈ Sym(X), the leading term as the limit point (the ”x” above) and fb as the direction of approach. Let K be the Lie algebra of the stabilizer of f and H the Lie algebra of the stabilizer of g. The local analysis gives us a flattening K0 of K as a subalgebra of H, thereby connecting the two stabilizers. There is a natural action of H on N = V/TOg. We show that K0 also stabilizes fb ∈ N . We show that there is an ǫ-extension Lie algebra K(ǫ) of K0 whose structure Computer Science Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai, India. adsul@cse.iitb.ac.in Computer Science Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai, and Indian Institute of Technology, Goa, India. sohoni@cse.iitb.ac.in Chennai Mathematical Institute, Chennai, India. kv@cmi.ac.in

[1]  Greta Panova,et al.  No Occurrence Obstructions in Geometric Complexity Theory , 2016, 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[2]  M. Gerstenhaber Dominance Over The Classical Groups , 1961 .

[3]  P. Michor,et al.  Differential geometry of g-manifolds , 1995 .

[4]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  Completeness classes in algebra , 1979, STOC.

[5]  Vladimir L. Popov,et al.  Two Orbits: When is one in the closure of the other? , 2008, 0808.2735.

[6]  Thomas Lickteig,et al.  On the Order of Approximation in Approximative Triadic Decompositions of Tensors , 1989, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[7]  G. Kempf,et al.  Instability in invariant theory , 1978, 1807.02890.

[8]  Pierre Lairez,et al.  The boundary of the orbit of the 3 by 3 determinant polynomial , 2016 .

[9]  V. Popov The cone of Hilbert Nullforms , 2010, 1009.6107.

[10]  Peter Bürgisser,et al.  Alternating minimization, scaling algorithms, and the null-cone problem from invariant theory , 2017, ITCS.

[11]  A. Nijenhuis,et al.  Deformations of Lie Algebra Structures , 1967 .

[12]  D. Hilbert,et al.  Ueber die vollen Invariantensysteme , 1893 .

[13]  P. Newstead Moduli Spaces and Vector Bundles: Geometric Invariant Theory , 2009 .

[14]  F. Wagemann Introduction to Lie algebra cohomology with a view towards BRST cohomology , 2010 .

[15]  Greta Panova,et al.  Rectangular Kronecker Coefficients and Plethysms in Geometric Complexity Theory , 2015, 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[16]  Youming Qiao,et al.  Non-commutative Edmonds’ problem and matrix semi-invariants , 2015, computational complexity.

[17]  W. Hesselink Singularities in the nilpotent scheme of a classical group , 1976 .

[18]  Jesko Hüttenhain Geometric complexity theory and orbit closures of homogeneous forms , 2017 .

[19]  T. Mignon,et al.  A quadratic bound for the determinant and permanent problem , 2004 .

[20]  Ketan Mulmuley,et al.  Geometric Complexity Theory I: An Approach to the P vs. NP and Related Problems , 2002, SIAM J. Comput..

[21]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Operator scaling via geodesically convex optimization, invariant theory and polynomial identity testing , 2018, STOC.

[22]  W. Hesselink Desingularizations of varieties of nullforms , 1979 .

[23]  J. M. Landsberg,et al.  An Overview of Mathematical Issues Arising in the Geometric Complexity Theory Approach to VP≠VNP , 2009, SIAM J. Comput..

[24]  Joshua A. Grochow Unifying Known Lower Bounds via Geometric Complexity Theory , 2013, 2014 IEEE 29th Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC).

[25]  Ketan Mulmuley,et al.  Geometric Complexity Theory II: Towards Explicit Obstructions for Embeddings among Class Varieties , 2006, SIAM J. Comput..

[26]  Harm Derksen,et al.  Polynomial degree bounds for matrix semi-invariants , 2015, ArXiv.

[27]  J. M. Landsberg,et al.  Hypersurfaces with degenerate duals and the Geometric Complexity Theory Program , 2010, ArXiv.

[28]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Operator Scaling: Theory and Applications , 2015, Found. Comput. Math..

[29]  J. Szenthe,et al.  Topics in Differential Geometry , 1988 .

[30]  J. M. Landsberg,et al.  Geometric complexity theory: an introduction for geometers , 2013, ANNALI DELL'UNIVERSITA' DI FERRARA.