Analysis of the mating process of plug-in cable connectors for the cable harness assembly task

In this paper, we analyze the mating process of plug-in cable connectors for wiring harness assembly tasks by showing the challenging difficulties around this task including the possible solutions: a new gripper design concept and analyzing the permissible error range (tolerance) between the connectors. For wiring harness assembly tasks, knowing the accurate pose of the grasped cable connector in the gripper is very critical for the successful mating process, and conventional mating processes rely on force control or mechanical passive compliance. Nowadays, we notice that collaboration robotic manipulators or small size industrial robotic manipulators attain high accuracy and repeatability levels (sub-millimeter) thus demonstrate very precise position control capacities. Using those capacities of the robotic manipulator, we analyze the permissible error range of connector for the mating process. For that reason, we propose a new design of a gripper for an accurate alignment and holding of the position between the cable and the gripper. Therefore, if we know the exact position of the connector in reference to the gripper, and the tolerance between the connectors is larger than error position of the robot arm, the mating process can be achieved by just using position control of conventional industrial robots.

[1]  Kevin M. Lynch,et al.  Dynamic Nonprehensile Manipulation: Controllability, Planning, and Experiments , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  Toshio Fukuda,et al.  A robotic assembly system capable of handling flexible cables with connector , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[3]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  The Calibration Index and Taxonomy for Robot Kinematic Calibration Methods , 1996, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  T. Fukuda,et al.  Modeling for Mating Process of Electric Connectors in Robotic Wiring Harness Assembly Systems , 2007, IECON 2007 - 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[5]  Kenneth Y. Goldberg,et al.  Orienting polygonal parts without sensors , 1993, Algorithmica.

[6]  Atsushi Konno,et al.  Development of a Wire Harness Assembly Motion Planner for Redundant Multiple Manipulators , 2011, J. Robotics Mechatronics.

[7]  Jizhong Xiao,et al.  Robust compliant assembly automation using an industrial robot , 2011, 2011 6th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications.

[8]  Matthew T. Mason,et al.  Parts orienting with partial sensor information , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[9]  Ning Xi,et al.  Industrial robot calibration using a virtual linear constraint , 2012 .

[10]  Kevin M. Lynch,et al.  Sensorless parts orienting with a one-joint manipulator , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Michael S. Branicky,et al.  Search strategies for peg-in-hole assemblies with position uncertainty , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[12]  Toshio Fukuda,et al.  Robotic wiring harness assembly system for fault-tolerant electric connectors mating , 2010, 2010 International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science.

[13]  Ferdinando Cannella,et al.  A Study on Error Recovery Search Strategies of Electronic Connector Mating for Robotic Fault-Tolerant Assembly , 2016, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..