A Biologically Based Flight Control System for a Blimp-based UAV

Autonomous navigation in 2D and 3D environments has been studied for a long time. Navigating within a 3D environment is very challenging for both animals and robots and a variety of sensors are used to solve this task ranging from vision or a simple gyro or compass to GPS. The principal tasks for 3D autonomous navigation are course stabilization, altitude and drift control, and collision avoidance. Using this basis, some features can be easily added like aerial mapping, object recognition, homing strategies or takeoff and landing. Here we present a biologically based control layer for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) that provides course stabilization, altitude and drift control, and collision avoidance. The properties of this neuronal control system are evaluated using a flying robot.

[1]  Thomas Netter,et al.  A robotic aircraft that follows terrain using a neuromorphic eye , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  A. Smit,et al.  Synapse Formation between Central Neurons Requires Postsynaptic Expression of the MEN1 Tumor Suppressor Gene , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  J. P. Lindemann,et al.  FliMax, a novel stimulus device for panoramic and highspeed presentation of behaviourally generated optic flow , 2003, Vision Research.

[4]  Reid R. Harrison,et al.  A Low-Power Analog VLSI Visual Collision Detector , 2003, NIPS.

[5]  P. Simmons,et al.  Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. I. Selective responses to approaching objects. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  M. Egelhaaf.  On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly , 1985 .

[7]  S. Benzer,et al.  Development of the Drosophila retina, a neurocrystalline lattice. , 1976, Developmental biology.

[8]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  On the neuronal basis of figure-ground discrimination by relative motion in the visual system of the fly , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  A. Borst,et al.  Motion computation and visual orientation in flies. , 1993, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Comparative physiology.

[10]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[11]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Using a Mobile Robot to Study Locust Collision Avoidance Responses , 1999, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[12]  V. Braitenberg.  Patterns of projection in the visual system of the fly. I. Retina-lamina projections , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Evolving Vision-Based Flying Robots , 2002, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[14]  Michael H Dickinson,et al.  The influence of visual landscape on the free flight behavior of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Visually guided landing of an unmanned aerial vehicle , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  How accurate need sensory coding be for behaviour? Experiments using a mobile robot , 2001, Neurocomputing.

[17]  C. Koch,et al.  Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming , 2002, Nature.

[18]  Hitoshi Yamada,et al.  A flying robot controlled by a biologically inspired vision system , 2001 .

[19]  G. Laurent,et al.  Elementary Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field Visual Neuron , 1995, Science.

[20]  M. Egelhaaf,et al.  Neural Processing of Naturalistic Optic Flow , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  IQR: a distributed system for real-time real-world neuronal simulation , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[22]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  An Investigation into Obstacle Avoidance as an ‘ Emergent ’ Behaviour from two Different Perspectives , 2002 .

[23]  Gordon Wyeth,et al.  Self-learning visual path recognition , 1999 .

[24]  S. Bermudez i Badia,et al.  A collision avoidance model based on the Lobula giant movement detector (LGMD) neuron of the locust , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541).

[25]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Goal-Directed Navigation of an Autonomous Flying Robot Using Biologically Inspired Cheap Vision , 2001 .

[26]  R. Hengstenberg.  Common visual response properties of giant vertical cells in the lobula plate of the blowflyCalliphora , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[27]  M Egelhaaf,et al.  Neuronal processing of behaviourally generated optic flow: experiments and model simulations , 2001, Network.

[28]  G. Schlotterer.  Response of the locust descending movement detector neuron to rapidly approaching and withdrawing visual stimuli , 1977 .

[29]  V. V. Hafner,et al.  Evolving neural controllers for visual navigation , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).

[30]  N. Strausfeld,et al.  Visual Motion-Detection Circuits in Flies: Parallel Direction- and Non-Direction-Sensitive Pathways between the Medulla and Lobula Plate , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.