On the benefits of not trying: brain activity and connectivity reflecting the interactions of explicit and implicit sequence learning.

Under certain circumstances, implicit, automatic learning may be attenuated by explicit memory processes. We explored the brain basis of this phenomenon in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of motor sequence learning. Using a factorial design that crossed subjective intention to learn (explicit versus implicit) with sequence difficulty (a standard versus a more complex alternating sequence), we show that explicit attempts to learn the difficult sequence produce a failure of implicit learning and, in a follow-up behavioural experiment, that this failure represents a suppression of learning itself rather than of the expression of learning. This suppression is associated with sustained right frontal activation and attenuation of learning-related changes in the medial temporal lobe and the thalamus. Furthermore, this condition is characterized by a reversal of the fronto-thalamic connectivity observed with unimpaired implicit learning. The findings demonstrate a neural basis for a well-known behavioural effect: the deleterious impact of an explicit search upon implicit learning.

[1]  W. Fitch,et al.  Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate , 2004, Science.

[2]  R. Passingham,et al.  The Time Course of Changes during Motor Sequence Learning: A Whole-Brain fMRI Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[3]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Imaging Brain Plasticity during Motor Skill Learning , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[4]  C. Carter,et al.  Regional brain activation during concurrent implicit and explicit sequence learning. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Striatum forever, despite sequence learning variability: A random effect analysis of PET data , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[6]  S. Rauch,et al.  Striatal recruitment during an implicit sequence learning task as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Anatomy of motor learning. II. Subcortical structures and learning by trial and error. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  C. Stern,et al.  An fMRI Study of the Role of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning , 2003, Neuron.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[10]  D. Howard,et al.  When it does hurt to try: Adult age differences in the effects of instructions on implicit pattern learning , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  R. Henson,et al.  Frontal lobes and human memory: insights from functional neuroimaging. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The hippocampus as an associator of discontiguous events , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  S. Keele,et al.  The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. , 2003, Psychological review.

[15]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The Hippocampus and Disambiguation of Overlapping Sequences , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  BrainWeb: Online Interface to a 3D MRI Simulated Brain Database , 1997 .

[17]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Critical role of the hippocampus in memory for sequences of events , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  The Relation Between Implicit and Explicit Learning: Evidence for Parallel Development , 1999 .

[20]  J. H. Howard,et al.  Age differences in implicit learning of higher order dependencies in serial patterns. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[21]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding. A PET study. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  J. Ashe,et al.  Cerebellum Activation Associated with Performance Change but Not Motor Learning , 2002, Science.

[23]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[24]  M. Gluck,et al.  Interactive memory systems in the human brain , 2001, Nature.

[25]  Robert J Zatorre,et al.  Recognition of interleaved melodies. An fMRI study. , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[26]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Tim Curran,et al.  Attentional and Nonattentional Forms of Sequence Learning , 1993 .

[28]  J. Marshall,et al.  The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Experience-dependent changes in cerebellar contributions to motor sequence learning , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[31]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Visuomotor Skill Learning in Human Subjects Examined with Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, The European journal of neuroscience.

[32]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional Mapping of Sequence Learning in Normal Humans , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  P. C. Murphy,et al.  Cerebral Cortex , 2017, Cerebral Cortex.

[34]  S. Rauch,et al.  Thalamic deactivation during early implicit sequence learning: a functional MRI study , 1998, Neuroreport.

[35]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[36]  A. Reber Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set. , 1976 .

[37]  M. Hallett,et al.  Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Recognition of Interleaved Melodies , 2003 .

[39]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[40]  M. Hallett,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of simple and complex sequential finger movements: a PET study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning , 1997 .

[42]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Specialized Neural Systems Underlying Representations of Sequential Movements , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  A PET investigation of implicit and explicit sequence learning , 1995 .

[44]  S. C. Strother,et al.  The Quantitative Evaluation of Functional Neuroimaging Experiments: Mutual Information Learning Curves , 2002, NeuroImage.

[45]  D. Brooks,et al.  Motor sequence learning: a study with positron emission tomography , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.