Does the brain know who is at the origin of what in an imitative interaction?

Brain correlates of the sense of agency have recently received increased attention. However, the explorations remain largely restricted to the study of brains in isolation. The prototypical paradigm used so far consists of manipulating visual perception of own action while asking the subject to draw a distinction between self- versus externally caused action. However, the recent definition of agency as a multifactorial phenomenon combining bottom-up and top-down processes suggests the exploration of more complex situations. Notably there is a need of accounting for the dynamics of agency in a two-body context where we often experience the double faceted question of who is at the origin of what in an ongoing interaction. In a dyadic context of role switching indeed, each partner can feel body ownership, share a sense of agency and altogether alternate an ascription of the primacy of action to self and to other. To explore the brain correlates of these different aspects of agency, we recorded with dual EEG and video set-ups 22 subjects interacting via spontaneous versus induced imitation (II) of hand movements. The differences between the two conditions lie in the fact that the roles are either externally attributed (induced condition) or result from a negotiation between subjects (spontaneous condition). Results demonstrate dissociations between self- and other-ascription of action primacy in delta, alpha and beta frequency bands during the condition of II. By contrast a similar increase in the low gamma frequency band (38–47 Hz) was observed over the centro-parietal regions for the two roles in spontaneous imitation (SI). Taken together, the results highlight the different brain correlates of agency at play during live interactions.

[1]  P. Baudonniere,et al.  The Social Function of Reciprocal Imitation in 2-Year-Old Peers , 1982 .

[2]  R. Llinás The intrinsic electrophysiological properties of mammalian neurons: insights into central nervous system function. , 1988, Science.

[3]  A. Meltzoff Foundations for developing a concept of self: The role of imitation in relating self to other and the value of social mirroring, social modeling, and self practice in infancy. , 1990 .

[4]  W. Singer,et al.  Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas , 1997, Nature.

[5]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[6]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Hallett,et al.  Task-related coherence and task-related spectral power changes during sequential finger movements. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  J. Marshall,et al.  The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  J. Nadel,et al.  Expectancies for social contingency in 2‐month‐olds , 1999 .

[10]  S. Cochin,et al.  Observation and execution of movement: similarities demonstrated by quantified electroencephalography , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  S. Gallagher Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: Abnormalities in the awareness of action , 2000, Brain Research Reviews.

[13]  Jacqueline Nadel,et al.  Do Children with Autism have Expectancies about the Social Behaviour of Unfamiliar People? , 2000 .

[14]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Functional dissociation of lower and upper frequency mu rhythms in relation to voluntary limb movement , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  M. Spinella,et al.  Subjective experience, involuntary movement, and posterior alien hand syndrome , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Recognition of self-produced movement in a case of severe neglect , 2000 .

[17]  E. Basar,et al.  Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[18]  J. Decety,et al.  Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  B. E. Eckbo,et al.  Appendix , 1826, Epilepsy Research.

[20]  Mukesh Dhamala,et al.  Hyperscanning : Simultaneous fMRI during Linked Social Interactions , 2001 .

[21]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[22]  C. Frith,et al.  Experiencing Oneself vs Another Person as Being the Cause of an Action: The Neural Correlates of the Experience of Agency , 2002, NeuroImage.

[23]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[24]  M. Jeannerod The mechanism of self-recognition in humans , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[25]  J. Decety,et al.  What you believe versus what you think they believe: a neuroimaging study of conceptual perspective‐taking , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[26]  J. Petit On the relation between recent neurobiological data on perception (and action) and the Husserlian theory of constitution , 2003 .

[27]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[28]  R. Kass,et al.  Automatic correction of ocular artifacts in the EEG: a comparison of regression-based and component-based methods , 2004 .

[29]  R. Kass,et al.  Automatic correction of ocular artifacts in the EEG: a comparison of regression-based and component-based methods. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[30]  F. Vignemont,et al.  The sense of agency: A philosophical and empirical review of the “Who” system , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[31]  S. Bressler,et al.  Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[33]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  J. Pineda The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing” , 2005, Brain Research Reviews.

[35]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Touching a Rubber Hand: Feeling of Body Ownership Is Associated with Activity in Multisensory Brain Areas , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Experimenting with the acting self , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[37]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[38]  T. Tamura,et al.  27th Annual Inter national Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , 2005 .

[39]  H. Théoret,et al.  EEG evidence for the presence of an action observation–execution matching system in children , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[40]  J. Nadel Does Imitation Matter to Children with Autism , 2006 .

[41]  M. Steriade Grouping of brain rhythms in corticothalamic systems , 2006, Neuroscience.

[42]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Hypermethods for EEG hyperscanning , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[43]  Marina Pavlova,et al.  Attentional modulation of cortical neuromagnetic gamma response to biological movement. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Jacqueline Nadel,et al.  Sensitivity to Social Contingency and Positive Emotion in 2‐Month‐Olds , 2006 .

[45]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of coherence differences , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[46]  J. Kelso,et al.  From the Cover : The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination , 2007 .

[47]  Jean Decety,et al.  MIMICRY AND ME: THE IMPACT OF MIMICRY ON SELF-CONSTRUAL , 2007 .

[48]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[49]  J. Palva,et al.  New vistas for α-frequency band oscillations , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[50]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Actor's and observer's primary motor cortices stabilize similarly after seen or heard motor actions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  J. Palva,et al.  New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations. , 2007, Trends in neurosciences.

[52]  Vilayanur S. Ramachandran,et al.  EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[53]  J. Decety,et al.  The Role of the Right Temporoparietal Junction in Social Interaction: How Low-Level Computational Processes Contribute to Meta-Cognition , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[54]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  The natural philosophy of agency , 2007 .

[55]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[56]  S. Baker Oscillatory interactions between sensorimotor cortex and the periphery , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[57]  G. Karmos,et al.  Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection , 2008, Science.

[58]  Peter Wittenburg,et al.  Annotation by Category: ELAN and ISO DCR , 2008, LREC.

[59]  Shu-Chen Li,et al.  Brains swinging in concert: cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.

[60]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Temporal Interactions between Cortical Rhythms , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[61]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Modulation of mu suppression in children with autism spectrum disorders in response to familiar or unfamiliar stimuli: The mirror neuron hypothesis , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[62]  S. Muthukumaraswamy,et al.  Modulation of the human mirror neuron system during cognitive activity. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[63]  A. Newen,et al.  Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[64]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Non-linear EEG synchronization during observation and execution of simple and complex sequential finger movements , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[65]  K. Vogeley,et al.  The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[66]  R. Hari,et al.  Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. , 2009, Physiological reviews.

[67]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Was it me or was it you? How the sense of agency originates from ideomotor learning revealed by fMRI , 2009, NeuroImage.

[68]  Noriaki Kanayama,et al.  The role of gamma band oscillations and synchrony on rubber hand illusion and crossmodal integration , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[69]  Tom Froese,et al.  On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency , 2009, Adapt. Behav..

[70]  Yoshikazu Isomura,et al.  Directional organization of sensorimotor oscillatory activity related to the electromyogram in the monkey , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[71]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Trial-by-trial coupling between EEG and BOLD identifies networks related to alpha and theta EEG power increases during working memory maintenance , 2009, NeuroImage.

[72]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Converging Intracranial Markers of Conscious Access , 2009, PLoS biology.

[73]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Frontoparietal Cortex Controls Spatial Attention through Modulation of Anticipatory Alpha Rhythms , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[74]  P. Fries Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[75]  Shigeru Sato,et al.  The neural basis of agency: An fMRI study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[76]  Manuel R. Mercier,et al.  Mental Imagery of Self-Location during Spontaneous and Active Self–Other Interactions: An Electrical Neuroimaging Study , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[77]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signatures of agency and body-ownership , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[78]  Line Garnero,et al.  Inter-Brain Synchronization during Social Interaction , 2010, PloS one.

[79]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Social interaction revealed by motion: dynamics of neuromagnetic gamma activity. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[80]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[81]  F. Cincotti,et al.  Neuroelectrical Hyperscanning Measures Simultaneous Brain Activity in Humans , 2010, Brain Topography.

[82]  P. Haggard,et al.  Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[83]  Miles A. Whittington,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[84]  P. Fossati,et al.  Different brain structures related to self- and external-agency attribution: a brief review and meta-analysis , 2011, Brain Structure and Function.

[85]  Peter F. Liddle,et al.  Changes in brain network activity during working memory tasks: A magnetoencephalography study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[86]  F. Vignemont Embodiment, ownership and disownership , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[87]  Jacqueline Nadel,et al.  Imitation in infancy , 2011 .

[88]  M. Hallett,et al.  The neural processes underlying self-agency. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[89]  Christof Koch,et al.  Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[90]  J. Nadel,et al.  Reciprocal imitation: toward a neural basis of social interaction. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[91]  Jacqueline Nadel,et al.  Anatomical Connectivity Influences both Intra- and Inter-Brain Synchronizations , 2012, PloS one.

[92]  Girijesh Prasad,et al.  Electrophysiological signatures of intentional social coordination in the 10–12Hz range , 2012, NeuroImage.

[93]  P. Haggard,et al.  Sense of agency , 2012, Current Biology.

[94]  M. Engelmann The Philosophical Investigations , 2013 .