Robust location detection in emergency sensor networks

We propose a new framework for providing robust location detection in emergency response systems, based on the theory of identifying codes. The key idea of this approach is to allow sensor coverage areas to overlap in such a way that each resolvable position is covered by a unique set of sensors. In this setting, determining a sensor-placement with a minimum number of sensors is equivalent to constructing an optimal identifying code, an NP-complete problem in general. We thus propose and analyze a new polynomial-time algorithm for generating irreducible codes for arbitrary topologies. We also generalize the concept of identifying codes to incorporate robustness properties that are critically needed in emergency networks and provide a polynomial-time algorithm to compute irreducible robust identifying codes. Through analysis and simulation, we show that our approach typically requires significantly fewer sensors than existing proximity-based schemes. Alternatively, for a fixed number of sensors, our scheme can provide robustness in the face of sensor failures or physical damage to the system.

[1]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Tracking requirements for augmented reality , 1993, CACM.

[2]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  SpotON: An Indoor 3D Location Sensing Technology Based on RF Signal Strength , 2000 .

[3]  Nageswara S. V. Rao,et al.  Computational Complexity Issues in Operative Diagnosis of Graph-Based Systems , 1993, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[4]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[5]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on on Mobile Computing and Networking (ACM MOBICOM ’00) The Cricket Location-Support System , 2022 .

[6]  Andy Hopper,et al.  The active badge location system , 1992, TOIS.

[7]  Miodrag Potkonjak,et al.  Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[8]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Next century challenges: mobile networking for “Smart Dust” , 1999, MobiCom.

[9]  Miodrag Potkonjak,et al.  Localized algorithms in wireless ad-hoc networks: location discovery and sensor exposure , 2001, MobiHoc '01.

[10]  Seth J. Teller,et al.  The cricket compass for context-aware mobile applications , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[11]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Rapid prototyping of mobile context-aware applications: the Cyberguide case study , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[12]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices , 2000, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[13]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Adaptive beacon placement , 2001, Proceedings 21st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[14]  Mark G. Karpovsky,et al.  On a New Class of Codes for Identifying Vertices in Graphs , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  S. Sitharama Iyengar,et al.  Coding theory framework for target location in distributed sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing.

[16]  S. Sitharama Iyengar,et al.  Grid Coverage for Surveillance and Target Location in Distributed Sensor Networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[17]  Ted Kremenek,et al.  A Probabilistic Room Location Service for Wireless Networked Environments , 2001, UbiComp.

[18]  Antoine Lobstein,et al.  Identifying Codes with Small Radius in Some Infinite Regular Graphs , 2002, Electron. J. Comb..

[19]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Connecting the Physical World with Pervasive Networks , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[20]  Andy Hopper,et al.  The Anatomy of a Context-Aware Application , 1999, Wirel. Networks.

[21]  B. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Global Positioning System , 1992 .