Deep Coverage: Motion Synthesis in the Data-Driven Era

Effective robotic systems must be able to produce desired motion in a sufficiently broad variety of robot states and environmental contexts. Classic control and planning methods achieve such coverage through the synthesis of model-based components. New applications and platforms, such as soft robots, present novel challenges, ranging from richer dynamical behaviors to increasingly unstructured environments. In these setups, derived models frequently fail to express important real-world subtleties. An increasingly popular approach to deal with this issue is the use of end-to-end machine learning architectures, which adapt to such complexities through a data-driven process. Unfortunately, however, data are not always available for all regions of the operational space, which complicates the extensibility of these solutions. In light of these issues, this paper proposes a reconciliation of classic motion synthesis with modern data-driven tools towards the objective of “deep coverage”. This notion utilizes the concept of composability, a feature of traditional control and planning methods, over data-derived “motion elements”, towards generalizable and scalable solutions that adapt to real-world experience.

[1]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Efficient Contact Determination in Dynamic Environments , 1997, Int. J. Comput. Geom. Appl..

[2]  Shusheng Bi,et al.  A survey of bio-inspired compliant legged robot designs , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[3]  Jun Nakanishi,et al.  Dynamical Movement Primitives: Learning Attractor Models for Motor Behaviors , 2013, Neural Computation.

[4]  Ian R. Manchester,et al.  LQR-trees: Feedback Motion Planning via Sums-of-Squares Verification , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Autonomous undulatory serpentine locomotion utilizing body dynamics of a fluidic soft robot , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[6]  S. Sastry,et al.  Stabilization of trajectories for systems with nonholonomic constraints , 1994 .

[7]  Sergey Levine,et al.  One-shot learning of manipulation skills with online dynamics adaptation and neural network priors , 2015, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[8]  Jordan B. Pollack,et al.  Evolutionary Techniques in Physical Robotics , 2000, ICES.

[9]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Sequential Composition of Dynamically Dexterous Robot Behaviors , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  Kostas E. Bekris,et al.  Asymptotically optimal sampling-based kinodynamic planning , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  Ahmed M. Elgammal,et al.  Human Motion Synthesis by Motion Manifold Learning and Motion Primitive Segmentation , 2006, AMDO.

[12]  Hod Lipson,et al.  The evolutionary origins of modularity , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Russ Tedrake,et al.  Feedback-motion-planning with simulation-based LQR-trees , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  Sergey Levine,et al.  End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policies , 2015, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[15]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Safe learning of regions of attraction for uncertain, nonlinear systems with Gaussian processes , 2016, 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[16]  David Hsu,et al.  Integrated perception and planning in the continuous space: A POMDP approach , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  Oliver Brock,et al.  Elastic roadmaps—motion generation for autonomous mobile manipulation , 2010, Auton. Robots.

[18]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  System design and locomotion of SUPERball, an untethered tensegrity robot , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[19]  Kostas E. Bekris,et al.  Discovering a Library of Rhythmic Gaits for Spherical Tensegrity Locomotion , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[20]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  FIRM: Sampling-based feedback motion-planning under motion uncertainty and imperfect measurements , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[21]  Lydia E. Kavraki,et al.  Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[22]  Alberto Bemporad,et al.  A survey on explicit model predictive control , 2009 .

[23]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  The Highly Adaptive SDM Hand: Design and Performance Evaluation , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[24]  Oliver Brock,et al.  A novel type of compliant and underactuated robotic hand for dexterous grasping , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[25]  Zhuo Wang,et al.  From model-based control to data-driven control: Survey, classification and perspective , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[26]  Jaime F. Fisac,et al.  Reachability-based safe learning with Gaussian processes , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[27]  François Laviolette,et al.  Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks , 2015, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[28]  J. Guldner,et al.  Sliding mode control for gradient tracking and robot navigation using artificial potential fields , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..