Activation of the Human Superior Temporal Gyrus during Observation of Goal Attribution by Intentional Objects

Previous functional imaging experiments in humans showed activation increases in the posterior superior temporal gyrus and sulcus during observation of geometrical shapes whose movements appear intentional or goal-directed. We modeled a chase scenario between two objects, in which the chasing object used different strategies to reach the target object: The chaser either followed the target's path or appeared to predict its end position. Activation in the superior temporal gyrus of human observers was greater when the chaser adopted a predict rather than a follow strategy. Attending to the chaser's strategy induced slightly greater activation in the left superior temporal gyrus than attending to the outcome of the chase. These data implicate the superior temporal gyrus in the identification of objects displaying complex goal-directed motion.

[1]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Motor task difficulty and brain activity: investigation of goal-directed reciprocal aiming using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Combining Spatial Extent and Peak Intensity to Test for Activations in Functional Imaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation in Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Parallels Parameter Inducing the Percept of Animacy , 2005, Neuron.

[4]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension , 1995, Cognition.

[7]  G. Csibra Teleological and referential understanding of action in infancy. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  J. Downar,et al.  A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[10]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: the case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change , 2002, Cognition.

[11]  N. Sadato,et al.  Attention to emotion modulates fMRI activity in human right superior temporal sulcus. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[13]  Aina Puce,et al.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  Susan C. Johnson Detecting agents. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  P. Todd,et al.  How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions , 1999 .

[17]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[18]  A. Klin Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: The Social Attribution Task. , 2000, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[19]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  The role of the fusiform face area in social cognition: implications for the pathobiology of autism. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[23]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Decety,et al.  A PET Investigation of the Attribution of Intentions with a Nonverbal Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[25]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[27]  C. Frith,et al.  Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[28]  J. Decety,et al.  Brain Regions Involved in the Perception of Gaze: A PET Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[29]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[30]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[31]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[32]  David C. Burr,et al.  Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.

[33]  H. Duvernoy The Human Brain , 1999, Springer Vienna.

[34]  J. A. Fodor A theory of the child's theory of mind , 1992, Cognition.

[35]  J. Decety,et al.  Top down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: a pet investigation. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[36]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modeling other minds , 1995, Neuroreport.

[37]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[38]  K. Zilles,et al.  Mind Reading: Neural Mechanisms of Theory of Mind and Self-Perspective , 2001, NeuroImage.

[39]  P. McGuire,et al.  Cortical substrates for the perception of face actions: an fMRI study of the specificity of activation for seen speech and for meaningless lower-face acts (gurning). , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[40]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[41]  Pascal Boyer,et al.  How the brain perceives causality: an event-related fMRI study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[42]  J. N. Bassili Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events , 1976 .

[43]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Visual analysis of body movements by neurones in the temporal cortex of the macaque monkey: A preliminary report , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Reafferent copies of imitated actions in the right superior temporal cortex , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.