The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century

The laboratory has been given a central and distinctive role in science education, and science educators have suggested that rich benefits in learning accrue from using laboratory activities. Twenty years have been elapsed since we published a frequently cited, critical review of the research on the school science laboratory (Hofstein & Lunetta, Rev. Educ. Res.52(2), 201–217, 1982). Twenty years later, we are living in an era of dramatic new technology resources and new standards in science education in which learning by inquiry has been given renewed central status. Methodologies for research and assessment that have developed in the last 20 years can help researchers seeking to understand how science laboratory resources are used, how students' work in the laboratory is assessed, and how science laboratory activities can be used by teachers to enhance intended learning outcomes. In that context, we take another look at the school laboratory in the light of contemporary practices and scholarship. This analysis examines scholarship that has emerged in the past 20 years in the context of earlier scholarship, contemporary goals for science learning, current models of how students construct knowledge, and information about how teachers and students engage in science laboratory activities. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed88:28–54, 2004; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/.sce10106

[1]  Joseph J. Schwab The Teaching of Science as Inquiry , 1958 .

[2]  Paul Franz Brandwein,et al.  The Teaching of science , 1962 .

[3]  P. D. Hurd New directions in teaching secondary school science , 1969 .

[4]  Pinchas Tamir,et al.  The Practical Mode—A Distinct Mode of Performance in Biology , 1972 .

[5]  A M Russell,et al.  Science and technology. , 1972, Science.

[6]  R. F. Kempa,et al.  Assessing Manipulative Skills in Practical Chemistry. , 1974 .

[7]  Robert Karplus,et al.  Science teaching and the development of reasoning , 1977 .

[8]  Robert E. Yager,et al.  What Research Says to the Science Teacher , 1978 .

[9]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  Matching Lab Activities with Teaching Goals. , 1979 .

[10]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[11]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Objective and continuous assessment of student performance in the physics laboratory , 1982 .

[12]  The fate of school science. , 1982, Science.

[13]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research , 1982 .

[14]  P. Tamir,et al.  The design and use of a Practical Tests Assessment Inventory , 1982 .

[15]  David P. Gardner,et al.  A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform , 1983, The Elementary School Journal.

[16]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform , 1983, CACM.

[17]  What Research Says , 1983 .

[18]  William C. Kyle,et al.  The effects of new science curricula on student performance , 1983 .

[19]  The Major Crisis in Science Education. , 1984 .

[20]  Peter Akinsola Okebukola,et al.  Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic science laboratory interaction patterns - effects on students' achievement and acquisition of practical skills , 1984 .

[21]  M. Driscoll,et al.  What Research Says. , 1984 .

[22]  Clarifying the Mission of the American High School. , 1984 .

[23]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Motivating strategies in science education: Attempt at an analysis , 1985 .

[24]  T. Bryce,et al.  What can they do? A review of practical assessment in Science , 1985 .

[25]  L. West,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change , 1985 .

[26]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[27]  Audrey B. Champagne,et al.  Instructional Consequences of Students' Knowledge about Physical Phenomena. , 1986 .

[28]  A. Dreyfus Manipulating and diversifying the levels of difficulty and task‐sophistication of one and the same laboratory exercise , 1986 .

[29]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Student task involvement and achievement in process-oriented science activities , 1986 .

[30]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  What happens in high school science classrooms , 1987 .

[31]  Aims, Purposes and Emphasis in Practical Biology at Advanced Level--A Study of Teachers' Attitudes. , 1988 .

[32]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  Development and Dilemmas in Science Education. , 1988 .

[33]  M. Linn,et al.  Learning and Instruction: An Examination of Four Research Perspectives in Science Education , 1988 .

[34]  J. J. Dupin,et al.  Analogies and “modeling analogies” in teaching: Some examples in basic electricity , 1989 .

[35]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[36]  Pinchas Tamir,et al.  Training Teachers to Teach Effectively in the Laboratory. , 1989 .

[37]  S. Sharan Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research , 1990 .

[38]  D. Cohen A Revolution in One Classroom: The Case of Mrs. Oublier , 1990 .

[39]  Elizabeth Hegarty-Hazel The Student laboratory and the science curriculum , 1990 .

[40]  J. Monkman,et al.  Setting the scene. , 2019, Nursing the elderly : in hospital, homes and the community.

[41]  R. F. Kempa,et al.  Motivational traits and preferences for different instructional modes in science , 1990 .

[42]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills in Microcomputer-Based Laboratories , 1990 .

[43]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning , 1990 .

[44]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition. , 1991 .

[45]  George M. Bodner,et al.  The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints , 1992 .

[46]  B. Fraser,et al.  Development and cross-national validation of a laboratory classroom environment instrument for senior high school science , 1993 .

[47]  Academic influence on school science curricula , 1993 .

[48]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Re-thinking Old Ways: Towards A More Critical Approach To Practical Work In School Science , 1993 .

[49]  Alternative Assessment of High School Laboratory Skills. , 1993 .

[50]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning Project. , 1993 .

[51]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  The development of science process skills in authentic contexts , 1993 .

[52]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory , 1994 .

[53]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The effect of levels of cooperation within physical science laboratory groups on physical science achievement , 1994 .

[54]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  What happens during high school chemistry laboratory sessions? A descriptive case study of the behaviors exhibited by three teachers and their students , 1994 .

[55]  Euwe van den Berg,et al.  The Role of "Experiments" in Conceptual Change: A Teaching-Experiment Study of Electric Circuits. , 1994 .

[56]  Connie Sparks The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching. , 1994 .

[57]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[58]  Campbell J. McRobbie,et al.  Science Laboratory Classroom Environments at Schools and Universities: A Cross‐National Study∗ , 1995 .

[59]  J. Lagowski National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[60]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  The Learning Environment of High School Students in Chemistry and Biology Laboratories. , 1996 .

[61]  J. Wilkinson,et al.  The Purpose and Perceived Effectiveness of Laboratory Work in Secondary Schools. , 1997 .

[62]  S. Loucks-Horsley Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .

[63]  D. Zeidler The central role of fallacious thinking in science education , 1997 .

[64]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Laboratory learning environments and practical tasks in senior secondary science classes , 1998 .

[65]  Drew H. Gitomer,et al.  Emerging Issues and Practices in Science Assessment , 1998 .

[66]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning , 1998 .

[67]  Marlow Ediger,et al.  Teaching Science as Inquiry. , 1998 .

[68]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[69]  Vincent N. Lunetta The School Science Laboratory: Historical Perspectives and Contexts for Contemporary Teaching , 1998 .

[70]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  From Physical Models to Biomechanics: A Design-Based Modeling Approach. , 1998 .

[71]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[72]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Instructional, Curricular, and Technological Supports for Inquiry in Science Classrooms , 1998 .

[73]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  International handbook of science education , 1998 .

[74]  J. Osborne,et al.  The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science , 1999 .

[75]  P. Taylor Constructivist approaches to science teaching , 1999 .

[76]  Julie Gess-Newsome Pedagogical Content Knowledge: An Introduction and Orientation , 1999 .

[77]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Construct and its Implications for Science Education , 2001 .

[78]  Joseph L. Polman,et al.  Designing Project-Based Science: Connecting Learners Through Guided Inquiry (Ways of Knowing in Science Series) , 1999 .

[79]  The Quantity and Quality of Biology Laboratory Work in British Columbia High Schools , 1999 .

[80]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[81]  S. Loucks-Horsley,et al.  Research on Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics and Science: The State of the Scene , 1999 .

[82]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[83]  R. Duschl,et al.  "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .

[84]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science , 2000 .

[85]  B. Reiser Developing reflective inquiry practices: A case study of software, the teacher and students: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings , 2001 .

[86]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[87]  Brian J. Reiser BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms: Twenty-five years of progress , 2001 .

[88]  K. Crowley,et al.  Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings. , 2001 .

[89]  Benny Hin Wai Yung,et al.  Three views of fairness in a school-based assessment scheme of practical work in biology , 2001 .

[90]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Assessment of the Learning Environment of Inquiry-Type Laboratories in High School Chemistry , 2001 .

[91]  L. Corno,et al.  Education across a century : the centennial volume , 2001 .

[92]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Chapter VIII: Modern Content and the Enterprise of Science: Science Education in the Twentieth Century , 2001, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[93]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2002 .

[94]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Scaffolding Preservice Science Teachers' Evidence-Based Arguments During an Investigation of Natural Selection , 2002 .

[95]  Thomas W. Shiland Probing for Understanding. , 2002 .

[96]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of progress portfolio , 2003 .

[97]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Providing High School Chemistry Students with Opportunities to Develop Learning Skills in an Inquiry-Type Laboratory: A Case Study. Research Report. , 2004 .