Reaching around obstacles accounts for uncertainty in coordinate transformations.

When reaching to a visual target, humans need to transform the spatial target representation into the coordinate system of their moving arm. It has been shown that increased uncertainty in such coordinate transformations, for instance when the head is rolled toward one shoulder, leads to higher movement variability and influence movement decisions. However, it is unknown whether the brain incorporates such added variability in planning and executing movements. We designed an obstacle avoidance task in which participants had to reach with or without visual feedback of the hand to a visual target while avoiding collisions with an obstacle. We varied coordinate transformation uncertainty by varying head roll (straight, 30° clockwise and 30° counterclockwise). In agreement with previous studies, we observed that the reaching variability increased when the head was tilted. Indeed, head roll did not influence the number of collisions during reaching compared to the head straight condition, but it did systematically change the obstacle avoidance behavior. Participants changed the preferred direction of passing the obstacle and increased the safety margins indicated by stronger movement curvature. These results suggest that the brain takes the added movement variability during head roll into account and compensates for it by adjusting the reaching trajectories.

[1]  S. Scott Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Gunnar Blohm,et al.  Quantifying effects of stochasticity in reference frame transformations on posterior distributions , 2015, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[3]  Stefan Van der Stigchel,et al.  The Effect of Similarity: Non-Spatial Features Modulate Obstacle Avoidance , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  O. Bock,et al.  Contribution of retinal versus extraretinal signals towards visual localization in goal-directed movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  D. Y. P. Henriques,et al.  Direction-dependent distortions of retinocentric space in the visuomotor transformation for pointing , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Otmar Bock,et al.  Localization of objects in the peripheral visual field , 1993, Behavioural Brain Research.

[8]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Obstacle Avoidance and a Perturbation Sensitivity Model for Motor Planning , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Erik J Schlicht,et al.  Impact of coordinate transformation uncertainty on human sensorimotor control. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Gunnar Blohm,et al.  Multi-Sensory Weights Depend on Contextual Noise in Reference Frame Transformations , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  J F Soechting,et al.  Moving in three-dimensional space: frames of reference, vectors, and coordinate systems. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  S. Lechner-Steinleitner,et al.  Interaction of labyrinthine and somatoreceptor inputs as determinants of the subjective vertical , 1978, Psychological research.

[14]  Stefan Van der Stigchel,et al.  How obstructing is an obstacle? The influence of starting posture on obstacle avoidance. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[15]  J. Saunders,et al.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  J B J Smeets,et al.  Do obstacles affect the selection of grasping points? , 2012, Human movement science.

[17]  Caroline Palmer,et al.  Cognitive and biomechanical influences in pianists’ finger tapping , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  P. Cisek,et al.  Rapid prediction of biomechanical costs during action decisions. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Liana E Brown,et al.  On the contributions of vision and proprioception to the representation of hand-near targets. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  E I Knudsen,et al.  Computational maps in the brain. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  Lacquaniti,et al.  Visuo‐motor transformations for arm reaching , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  Gunnar Blohm,et al.  Neck muscle spindle noise biases reaches in a multisensory integration task. , 2018, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Stephen H Scott,et al.  Influence of the behavioral goal and environmental obstacles on rapid feedback responses. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  David C Knill,et al.  Visual Feedback Control of Hand Movements , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Grasping without vision: Time normalizing grip aperture profiles yields spurious grip scaling to target size , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  S. Scott,et al.  Robust Control in Human Reaching Movements: A Model-Free Strategy to Compensate for Unpredictable Disturbances , 2019, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  I. Curthoys,et al.  The Effect of Ocular Torsional Position on Perception of the Roll-tilt of Visual Stimuli , 1997, Vision Research.

[29]  R. Johansson,et al.  Eye–Hand Coordination in Object Manipulation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Katja Fiehler,et al.  No effect of delay on the spatial representation of serial reach targets , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Missing in action: the effect of obstacle position and size on avoidance while reaching , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Gunnar Blohm,et al.  Head roll influences perceived hand position. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[34]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Why Does the Brain Predict Sensory Consequences of Oculomotor Commands? Optimal Integration of the Predicted and the Actual Sensory Feedback , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Stephen H Scott,et al.  Computational approaches to motor control and their potential role for interpreting motor dysfunction. , 2003, Current opinion in neurology.

[36]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Controlling the statistics of action: obstacle avoidance. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Oculocentric frames of reference for limb movement. , 2002, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[38]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  Multisensory Integration during Motor Planning , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  David A. Rosenbaum,et al.  Manual obstacle avoidance takes into account visual uncertainty, motor noise, and biomechanical costs , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Gunnar Blohm,et al.  Computations for geometrically accurate visually guided reaching in 3-D space. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[41]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[42]  Constanze Hesse,et al.  Avoiding unseen obstacles: Subcortical vision is not sufficient to maintain normal obstacle avoidance behaviour during reaching , 2018, Cortex.

[43]  Sabine M P Verschueren,et al.  Position sensitivity of human muscle spindles: single afferent and population representations. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  W H Ehrenstein,et al.  Auditory-visual spatial integration: a new psychophysical approach using laser pointing to acoustic targets. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  Eli Brenner,et al.  How Can You Best Measure Reaction Times? , 2018, Journal of motor behavior.

[46]  Christopher A. Buneo,et al.  Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching , 2002, Nature.

[47]  J. Crawford,et al.  Gaze-Centered Remapping of Remembered Visual Space in an Open-Loop Pointing Task , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  Yale E. Cohen,et al.  A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[49]  G E Loeb,et al.  The computation of position sense from spindles in mono- and multiarticular muscles , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[50]  R. Andersen,et al.  The posterior parietal cortex: Sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  The Role of Inertial Sensitivity in Motor Planning , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  What Silly Postures Tell Us about the Brain , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[53]  Jason P. Gallivan,et al.  Three-dimensional reach trajectories as a probe of real-time decision-making between multiple competing targets , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[54]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  Sensory transformations and the use of multiple reference frames for reach planning , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  J Douglas Crawford,et al.  Hand-related rather than goal-related source of gaze-dependent errors in memory-guided reaching. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[56]  H. C. Dijkerman,et al.  The influence of object identity on obstacle avoidance reaching behaviour. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[57]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  The contribution of coordinated eye and head movements in hand pointing accuracy , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[58]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[59]  Constanze Hesse,et al.  The Effect of Gaze Position on Reaching Movements in an Obstacle Avoidance Task , 2015, PloS one.

[60]  M. Chacron,et al.  Neural Variability, Detection Thresholds, and Information Transmission in the Vestibular System , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  A. Faisal,et al.  Noise in the nervous system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.