The spatiotemporal neural dynamics underlying perceived similarity for real-world objects

The degree to which we perceive real-world objects as similar or dissimilar structures our perception and guides categorization behavior. Here, we investigated the neural representations enabling perceived similarity using behavioral judgments, fMRI and MEG. As different object dimensions co-occur and partly correlate, to understand the relationship between perceived similarity and brain activity it is necessary to assess the unique role of multiple object dimensions. We thus behaviorally assessed perceived object similarity in relation to shape, function, color and background. We then used representational similarity analyses to relate these behavioral judgments to brain activity. We observed a link between each object dimension and representations in visual cortex. These representations emerged rapidly within 200 ms of stimulus onset. Assessing the unique role of each object dimension revealed partly overlapping and distributed representations: while color-related representations distinctly preceded shape-related representations both in the processing hierarchy of the ventral visual pathway and in time, several dimensions were linked to high-level ventral visual cortex. Further analysis singled out the shape dimension as neither fully accounted for by supra-category membership, nor a deep neural network trained on object categorization. Together our results comprehensively characterize the relationship between perceived similarity of key object dimensions and neural activity.

[1]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision , 1989, Nature.

[2]  Radoslaw Martin Cichy,et al.  Multivariate pattern analysis for MEG: A comparison of dissimilarity measures , 2018, NeuroImage.

[3]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  Representation Of, Representation As , 2008 .

[5]  Olivier Ledoit,et al.  A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices , 2004 .

[6]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[8]  Radoslaw Martin Cichy,et al.  Resolving human object recognition in space and time , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Radoslaw Martin Cichy,et al.  The representational dynamics of task and object processing in humans , 2018, eLife.

[10]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Author ' s personal copy Representational geometry : integrating cognition , computation , and the brain , 2013 .

[12]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  K. H. Britten,et al.  A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque , 2008 .

[14]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Visual scenes are categorized by function. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Un co rre cte d Pr oo f RT for Object Categorization Is Predicted by Representational Distance , 2013 .

[16]  Chris I. Baker,et al.  The temporal evolution of conceptual object representations revealed through models of behavior, semantics and deep neural networks , 2017, NeuroImage.

[17]  Thomas A. Carlson,et al.  Emerging Object Representations in the Visual System Predict Reaction Times for Categorization , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  Paul Sajda,et al.  Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial-to-trial variability of the EEG , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[20]  R. Vogels,et al.  Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Dimitrios Pantazis,et al.  Similarity-Based Fusion of MEG and fMRI Reveals Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in Human Cortex During Visual Object Recognition , 2015, bioRxiv.

[22]  Samuel A. Nastase,et al.  Attention Selectively Reshapes the Geometry of Distributed Semantic Representation , 2016, bioRxiv.

[23]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Nonvisual and Visual Object Shape Representations in Occipitotemporal Cortex: Evidence from Congenitally Blind and Sighted Adults , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Radoslaw Martin Cichy,et al.  Imagery and perception share cortical representations of content and location. , 2012, Cerebral Cortex.

[25]  N. Makris,et al.  Multimodal neuroimaging dissociates hemodynamic and electrophysiological correlates of error processing , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Reliability of dissimilarity measures for multi-voxel pattern analysis , 2016, NeuroImage.

[27]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[28]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Distinct contributions of functional and deep neural network features to representational similarity of scenes in human brain and behavior , 2018, eLife.

[29]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[30]  R. Berndt,et al.  Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction , 1985, Nature.

[31]  J. S. Guntupalli,et al.  The Representation of Biological Classes in the Human Brain , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  P. Sajda,et al.  Temporal characterization of the neural correlates of perceptual decision making in the human brain. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  Liang Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Maps of Visual Topography in Human Cortex. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[35]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[36]  Jonas Kubilius,et al.  Deep Neural Networks as a Computational Model for Human Shape Sensitivity , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  H. P. Op de Beeck,et al.  Task Context Overrules Object- and Category-Related Representational Content in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Adapting Deep Network Features to Capture Psychological Representations: An Abridged Report , 2017, IJCAI.

[39]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Deep Supervised, but Not Unsupervised, Models May Explain IT Cortical Representation , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[40]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.

[41]  A. Damasio Category-related recognition defects as a clue to the neural substrates of knowledge , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[42]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[43]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The human visual cortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[44]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Perceptual similarity of visual patterns predicts dynamic neural activation patterns measured with MEG , 2016, NeuroImage.

[45]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Is neuroimaging measuring information in the brain? , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[46]  Alexander G. Huth,et al.  Attention During Natural Vision Warps Semantic Representation Across the Human Brain , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  David A. Tovar,et al.  Representational dynamics of object vision: the first 1000 ms. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[48]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Unique semantic space in the brain of each beholder predicts perceived similarity , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Stefania Bracci,et al.  Avoiding illusory effects in representational similarity analysis: What (not) to do with the diagonal , 2017, NeuroImage.

[50]  S. Taulu,et al.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[51]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Only some spatial patterns of fMRI response are read out in task performance , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Partially Distributed Representations of Objects and Faces in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  Kendrick N Kay,et al.  Bottom-up and top-down computations in word- and face-selective cortex , 2017, eLife.

[55]  VanrullenRufin,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001 .

[56]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[57]  Leila Reddy,et al.  Category Selectivity in the Ventral Visual Pathway Confers Robustness to Clutter and Diverted Attention , 2007, Current Biology.

[58]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Action-Related Properties Shape Object Representations in the Ventral Stream , 2007, Neuron.

[59]  R N Shepard,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling, Tree-Fitting, and Clustering , 1980, Science.

[60]  A. Oliva,et al.  A Real-World Size Organization of Object Responses in Occipitotemporal Cortex , 2012, Neuron.

[61]  R. Shepard,et al.  Second-order isomorphism of internal representations: Shapes of states ☆ , 1970 .

[62]  Ha Hong,et al.  Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Predicting judged similarity of natural categories from their neural representations , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Multivariate Patterns in Object-Selective Cortex Dissociate Perceptual and Physical Shape Similarity , 2008, PLoS biology.

[65]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[66]  J. Duncan,et al.  Discrimination of Visual Categories Based on Behavioral Relevance in Widespread Regions of Frontoparietal Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[67]  Roger N. Shepard Toward a Universal Law of Generalization: Response , 1988 .

[68]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[69]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Perceived Shape Similarity among Unfamiliar Objects and the Organization of the Human Object Vision Pathway , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[70]  David M. Groppe,et al.  Exemplar selectivity reflects perceptual similarities in the human fusiform cortex. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[71]  Leila Reddy,et al.  Coding of visual objects in the ventral stream , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[72]  B. Tversky,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General VOL . 113 , No . 2 JUNE 1984 Objects , Parts , and Categories , 2005 .

[73]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[74]  Marcel A. J. van Gerven,et al.  Deep Neural Networks Reveal a Gradient in the Complexity of Neural Representations across the Ventral Stream , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[75]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  The distribution of category and location information across object-selective regions in human visual cortex , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[76]  R. Goebel,et al.  Human Object-Similarity Judgments Reflect and Transcend the Primate-IT Object Representation , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[77]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Goal-Directed Visual Processing Differentially Impacts Human Ventral and Dorsal Visual Representations , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[78]  Daria Proklova,et al.  MEG sensor patterns reflect perceptual but not categorical similarity of animate and inanimate objects , 2018, NeuroImage.

[79]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Comparison of deep neural networks to spatio-temporal cortical dynamics of human visual object recognition reveals hierarchical correspondence , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[80]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Task context impacts visual object processing differentially across the cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[81]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[82]  S. Taulu,et al.  Suppression of Interference and Artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method , 2003, Brain Topography.

[83]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[84]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Inverse MDS: Inferring Dissimilarity Structure from Multiple Item Arrangements , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[85]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Eccentricity Bias as an Organizing Principle for Human High-Order Object Areas , 2002, Neuron.

[86]  I. Biederman,et al.  Tuning for shape dimensions in macaque inferior temporal cortex , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[87]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Deep neural networks: a new framework for modelling biological vision and brain information processing , 2015, bioRxiv.

[88]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Fixed versus mixed RSA: Explaining visual representations by fixed and mixed feature sets from shallow and deep computational models , 2014, bioRxiv.

[89]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Representational Distance Learning for Deep Neural Networks , 2015, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[90]  S Edelman,et al.  Representation is representation of similarities , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[91]  Naokazu Goda,et al.  Transformation from image-based to perceptual representation of materials along the human ventral visual pathway , 2011, NeuroImage.

[92]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  Toward a Unified Theory of Similarity and Recognition , 1988 .

[93]  Polina Golland,et al.  Coping with confounds in multivoxel pattern analysis: What should we do about reaction time differences? A comment on Todd, Nystrom & Cohen 2013 , 2014, NeuroImage.

[94]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[95]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Reaction Time for Object Categorization Is Predicted by Representational Distance , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[96]  K. H. Britten,et al.  A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque MT , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[97]  John Hart,et al.  Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction , 1998 .

[98]  G. Rees,et al.  Predicting the Stream of Consciousness from Activity in Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Current Biology.

[99]  Chris I. Baker,et al.  The Representational Dynamics of Task and Object Category Processing in Humans , 2017, bioRxiv.

[100]  R. Nosofsky American Psychological Association, Inc. Choice, Similarity, and the Context Theory of Classification , 2022 .

[101]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Deep Neural Networks in Computational Neuroscience , 2019 .

[102]  G. Aguirre,et al.  Different spatial scales of shape similarity representation in lateral and ventral LOC. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[103]  Chris I. Baker,et al.  Deconstructing multivariate decoding for the study of brain function , 2017, NeuroImage.

[104]  Michael Guerzhoy,et al.  Deep Neural Networks , 2013 .