Convergent evidence for the visual analysis of optic flow through anisotropic attenuation of high spatial frequencies.

Photoreceptors strongly attenuate high temporal frequencies. Hence when an image moves, high spatial frequency components are lost if their direction of modulation coincides with the direction of movement, but not if it is orthogonal. The power spectra of natural images are remarkably consistent in having a 1/f 2 falloff in power in all directions. For moving images, the spatial power spectra will be distorted by becoming steeper in the direction corresponding to modulation in the direction of motion, and the contours of equal power will tend to become elliptical. This study demonstrates that the mammalian visual system is specifically sensitive to such anisotropic changes of the local power spectrum, and it is suggested that these distortions are used to determine patterns of optic flow. Convergent evidence from work on Glass figures, motion streaks, and sensitivity to non-Cartesian gratings is called on in support of this interpretation, which has been foreshadowed in several recent publications.

[1]  H. Barlow.  Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  J. Robson.  Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .

[4]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  L. Glass.  Moiré Effect from Random Dots , 1969, Nature.

[7]  L. Maffei,et al.  The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyser. , 1973, Vision research.

[8]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Invariant Properties of the Motion Parallax Field due to the Movement of Rigid Bodies Relative to an Observer , 1975 .

[9]  J. Movshon,et al.  Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Spatiotemporal contrast detection threshold surface is bimodal. , 1979, Optics letters.

[11]  D. Pollen,et al.  Relationship between spatial frequency selectivity and receptive field profile of simple cells. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  S Marcelja,et al.  Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  H. Barlow.  Critical limiting factors in the design of the eye and visual cortex , 1981 .

[14]  H B Barlow,et al.  The Ferrier lecture, 1980 , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  A.V. Oppenheim,et al.  The importance of phase in signals , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  L N Piotrowski,et al.  A Demonstration of the Visual Importance and Flexibility of Spatial-Frequency Amplitude and Phase , 1982, Perception.

[17]  D H Kelly.  Visual processing of moving stimuli. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  A. Verri,et al.  First-order analysis of optical flow in monkey brain. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. , 1993, Science.

[22]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Both the phase and the amplitude spectrum may determine the appearance of natural images , 1993, Vision Research.

[23]  D. Burr,et al.  Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion , 1995, Nature.

[24]  D. C. Essen,et al.  Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[26]  H Barlow,et al.  Correspondence Noise and Signal Pooling in the Detection of Coherent Visual Motion , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  H. Wilson,et al.  Detection of global structure in Glass patterns: implications for form vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[28]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction , 1999, Nature.

[29]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Coherent global motion in the absence of coherent velocity signals , 2000, Current Biology.

[30]  D. Burr,et al.  Motion vision: Are ‘speed lines’ used in human visual motion? , 2000, Current Biology.

[31]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Motion direction signals in the primary visual cortex of cat and monkey. , 2001, Visual neuroscience.

[32]  H Barlow,et al.  Redundancy reduction revisited , 2001, Network.

[33]  G Westheimer,et al.  The Fourier Theory of Vision , 2001, Perception.

[34]  Refractor.  Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[35]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain , 2001, Nature.

[36]  John Ross,et al.  Direct Evidence That “Speedlines” Influence Motion Mechanisms , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Anthony J. Movshon,et al.  Signals in Macaque Striate Cortical Neurons that Support the Perception of Glass Patterns , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Frank Bremmer,et al.  Neural correlates of implied motion , 2003, Nature.