Online User Assessment for Minimal Intervention During Task-Based Robotic Assistance

We propose a novel criterion for evaluating user input for human-robot interfaces for known tasks. We use the mode insertion gradient (MIG)---a tool from hybrid control theory---as a filtering criterion that instantaneously assesses the impact of user actions on a dynamic system over a time window into the future. As a result, the filter is permissive to many chosen strategies, minimally engaging, and skill-sensitive---qualities desired when evaluating human actions. Through a human study with 28 healthy volunteers, we show that the criterion exhibits a low, but significant, negative correlation between skill level, as estimated from task-specific measures in unassisted trials, and the rate of controller intervention during assistance. Moreover, a MIG-based filter can be utilized to create a shared control scheme for training or assistance. In the human study, we observe a substantial training effect when using a MIG-based filter to perform cart-pendulum inversion, particularly when comparing improvement via the RMS error measure. Using simulation of a controlled spring-loaded inverted pendulum (SLIP) as a test case, we observe that the MIG criterion could be used for assistance to guarantee either task completion or safety of a joint human-robot system, while maintaining the system's flexibility with respect to user-chosen strategies.

[1]  Kris K. Hauser,et al.  Assisted Teleoperation Strategies for Aggressively Controlling a Robot Arm with 2D Input , 2011, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[2]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Transition-time optimization for switched-mode dynamical systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[3]  Brenna D. Argall,et al.  Turning assistive machines into assistive robots , 2015, SPIE OPTO.

[4]  Anca D. Dragan,et al.  Enabling robots to communicate their objectives , 2017, Autonomous Robots.

[5]  R. Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  J. Dewald,et al.  Progressive Shoulder Abduction Loading is a Crucial Element of Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  Y. Wardi,et al.  Algorithm for optimal mode scheduling in switched systems , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[8]  H. Benjamin Brown,et al.  Evidence for Spring Loaded Inverted Pendulum Running in a Hexapod Robot , 2000, ISER.

[9]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Optimizing Compliant, Model-Based Robotic Assistance to Promote Neurorehabilitation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Autonomy infused teleoperation with application to brain computer interface controlled manipulation , 2017, Autonomous Robots.

[11]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Feasibility of Manual Teach-and-Replay and Continuous Impedance Shaping for Robotic Locomotor Training Following Spinal Cord Injury , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Manoj Srinivasan,et al.  Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking and running , 2006, Nature.

[13]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  Mark Mulder,et al.  Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority? , 2012, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[15]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Anca D. Dragan,et al.  Active Preference-Based Learning of Reward Functions , 2017, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[17]  A. Mayr,et al.  Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[18]  Axel Lankenau,et al.  A versatile and safe mobility assistant , 2001, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[19]  Yacine Amirat,et al.  Real-Time EMG Driven Lower Limb Actuated Orthosis for Assistance As Needed Movement Strategy , 2013, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[20]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Contractive model predictive control for constrained nonlinear systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[21]  Stefanos Nikolaidis,et al.  Optimization of Temporal Dynamics for Adaptive Human-Robot Interaction in Assembly Manufacturing , 2012, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[22]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[23]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery , 2004 .

[24]  Peter Gwynne,et al.  Technology: Mobility machines , 2013, Nature.

[25]  S. Mitter,et al.  The conjugate gradient method for optimal control problems , 1967 .

[26]  Howie Choset,et al.  Simultaneous Compliance and Registration Estimation for Robotic Surgery , 2014, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[27]  Julius P. A. Dewald,et al.  Robotic quantification of upper extremity loss of independent joint control or flexion synergy in individuals with hemiparetic stroke: a review of paradigms addressing the effects of shoulder abduction loading , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[28]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Herman van der Kooij,et al.  Model predictive control-based gait pattern generation for wearable exoskeletons , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[30]  Arno H. A. Stienen,et al.  The ACT-4D: A novel rehabilitation robot for the quantification of upper limb motor impairments following brain injury , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[31]  James L. Patton,et al.  Distributions in the error space: Goal-directed movements described in time and state-space representations , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[32]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[33]  Yiannis Demiris,et al.  Increasing robotic wheelchair safety with collaborative control: Evidence from secondary task experiments , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[34]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Adaptive Automation for Human-Robot Teaming in Future Command and Control Systems , 2007 .

[35]  Paul A. Beardsley,et al.  Shared control of autonomous vehicles based on velocity space optimization , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[36]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  A numerical method for the optimal control of switched systems , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[37]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[38]  Todd D. Murphey,et al.  Sequential Action Control: Closed-Form Optimal Control for Nonlinear and Nonsmooth Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[39]  Kathleen Fitzsimons,et al.  Optimal human-in-the-loop interfaces based on Maxwell's Demon , 2016, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[40]  W. Rymer,et al.  Adaptive assistance for guided force training in chronic stroke , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[41]  Ewart de Visser,et al.  Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration , 2007, 2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems.