Human-Robotic Variable-Stiffness Grasps of Small-Fruit Containers Are Successful Even Under Severely Impaired Sensory Feedback

Application areas of robotic grasping extend to delicate objects like groceries. The intrinsic elasticity offered by variable-stiffness actuators (VSA) appears to be promising in terms of being able to adapt to the object shape, to withstand collisions with the environment during the grasp acquisition, and to resist the weight applied to the fingers by a lifted object during the actual grasp. It is hypothesized that these properties are particularly useful in the absence of high-quality sensory feedback, which would otherwise be able to guide the shape adaptation and collision avoidance, and that in this case, VSA hands perform better than hands with fixed stiffness. This hypothesis is tested in an experiment where small-fruit containers are picked and placed using a newly developed variable-stiffness robotic hand. The grasp performance is measured under different sensory feedback conditions: full or impaired visual feedback, full or impaired force feedback. The hand is switched between a variable-stiffness mode and two fixed-stiffness modes. Strategies for modulating the stiffness and exploiting environmental constraints are observed from human operators that control the robotic hand. The results show consistently successful grasps under all stiffness and feedback conditions. However, the performance is affected by the amount of available visual feedback. Different stiffness modes turn out to be beneficial in different feedback conditions and with respect to different performance criteria, but a general advantage of VSA over fixed stiffness cannot be shown for the present task. Guidance of the fingers along cracks and gaps is observed, which may inspire the programming of autonomously grasping robots.

[1]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Physical Human-Robot Interaction via Crash-Testing , 2007, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[2]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Tele-impedance with force feedback under communication time delay , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[3]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Tele-impedance: Teleoperation with impedance regulation using a body–machine interface , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  A synergy-driven approach to a myoelectric hand , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[5]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The control of stable postures in the multijoint arm , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Oliver Brock,et al.  A novel type of compliant and underactuated robotic hand for dexterous grasping , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  Markus Grebenstein,et al.  Approaching Human Performance - The Functionality-Driven Awiwi Robot Hand , 2014, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[8]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Exploring Teleimpedance and Tactile Feedback for Intuitive Control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[9]  Volkan Patoglu,et al.  Tele-impedance control of a variable stiffness prosthetic hand , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[10]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Variable impedance actuators: A review , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[11]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[12]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[13]  Werner Friedl,et al.  FAS A flexible Antagonistic spring element for a high performance over actuated hand , 2011, IROS 2011.

[14]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  The Grasp Perturbator: Calibrating human grasp stiffness during a graded force task , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Oliver Brock,et al.  Exploitation of environmental constraints in human and robotic grasping , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[17]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  Variable Stiffness Actuators: Review on Design and Components , 2016, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[18]  Justin Bayer,et al.  Key Insights into Hand Biomechanics: Human Grip Stiffness Can Be Decoupled from Force by Cocontraction and Predicted from Electromyography , 2017, Front. Neurorobot..

[19]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The DLR hand arm system , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  P. Crago,et al.  Multijoint dynamics and postural stability of the human arm , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Eric J Perreault,et al.  Voluntary control of static endpoint stiffness during force regulation tasks. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.