Imitation by social interaction? Analysis of a minimal agent-based model of the correspondence problem

One of the major challenges faced by explanations of imitation is the “correspondence problem”: how is an agent able to match its bodily expression to the observed bodily expression of another agent, especially when there is no possibility of external self-observation? Current theories only consider the possibility of an innate or acquired matching mechanism belonging to an isolated individual. In this paper we evaluate an alternative that situates the explanation of imitation in the inter-individual dynamics of the interaction process itself. We implemented a minimal model of two interacting agents based on a recent psychological study of imitative behavior during minimalist perceptual crossing. The agents cannot sense the configuration of their own body, and do not have access to other's body configuration, either. And yet surprisingly they are still capable of converging on matching bodily configurations. Analysis revealed that the agents solved this version of the correspondence problem in terms of collective properties of the interaction process. Contrary to the assumption that such properties merely serve as external input or scaffolding for individual mechanisms, it was found that the behavioral dynamics were distributed across the model as a whole.

[1]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Explaining Facial Imitation: A Theoretical Model. , 1997, Early development & parenting.

[2]  T. Ikegami,et al.  Turn-taking interaction as a cooperative and co-creative process. , 2007, Infant behavior & development.

[3]  Line Garnero,et al.  Inter-Brain Synchronization during Social Interaction , 2010, PloS one.

[4]  C. Heyes Causes and consequences of imitation , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  M. Tomasello Cultural Transmission , 2001 .

[6]  Charles Lenay,et al.  Minimalist Approach to Perceptual Interactions , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  M. Rohde,et al.  Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction? Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing , 2008 .

[8]  Charles Lenay,et al.  Beyond the internalism/externalism debate: The constitution of the space of perception , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[9]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The Dynamics of Active Categorical Perception in an Evolved Model Agent , 2003, Adapt. Behav..

[10]  D. Perrett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.11 November 2004 Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective , 2022 .

[11]  Tom Froese,et al.  Toward Minimally Social Behavior: Social Psychology Meets Evolutionary Robotics , 2009, ECAL.

[12]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction? , 2001 .

[13]  M. Brass,et al.  Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  The Mirror Neuron System and Imitation , 2011 .

[15]  Tom Froese,et al.  Stability of Coordination Requires Mutuality of Interaction in a Model of Embodied Agents , 2008, SAB.

[16]  Nick Chater,et al.  Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals , 2005 .

[17]  Charles Lenay,et al.  “You never fail to surprise me”: the hallmark of the Other: Experimental study and simulations of perceptual crossing , 2011 .

[18]  S. Gallagher How the body shapes the mind , 2005 .

[19]  C. Heyes,et al.  'Mirroring' Association and the Correspondence Problem , 2008 .

[20]  G. Csibra Action mirroring and action understanding: an alternative account , 1993 .

[21]  J. Nadel,et al.  Does the brain know who is at the origin of what in an imitative interaction? , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  Wolf Singer Binding by synchrony , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[23]  Marieke Rohde,et al.  Enaction, Embodiment, Evolutionary Robotics - Simulation Models for a Post-Cognitivist Science of Mind , 2010, Atlantis Thinking Machines.

[24]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Evolutionary Robotics: A New Scientific Tool for Studying Cognition , 2005, Artificial Life.

[25]  S. Gallagher,et al.  The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science , 2007 .

[26]  M. Auvray,et al.  Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment , 2009 .

[27]  C. Frith,et al.  Rapid Response Subject Collections , 2022 .

[28]  Susan S. Jones,et al.  The development of imitation in infancy , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  S Hurley,et al.  Perspectives on Imitation , 2004 .

[30]  Tom Froese,et al.  Modelling social interaction as perceptual crossing: an investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process , 2010, Connect. Sci..

[31]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Imitation by association , 2005 .

[32]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates , 1977, Science.

[33]  Tom Froese,et al.  The Extended Body: a Case Study in the Neurophenomenology of Social Interaction , 2012 .

[34]  Vasudevi Reddy,et al.  Participants Don’t Need Theories , 2004 .

[35]  John Michael,et al.  Interaction and social cognition: A comment on Auvray et al.’s perceptual crossing paradigm , 2012 .

[36]  Mitchell Herschbach,et al.  On the role of social interaction in social cognition: a mechanistic alternative to enactivism , 2012 .

[37]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  Lincoln Smith,et al.  Evolving controllers for a homogeneous system of physical robots: structured cooperation with minimal sensors , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[39]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  What imitation tells us about social cognition: a rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[40]  Seth Bullock,et al.  Simulation models as opaque thought experiments , 2000 .

[41]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo,et al.  Behavioral Coordination, Structural Congruence and Entrainment in a Simulation of Acoustically Coupled Agents , 2000, Adapt. Behav..

[42]  C. Trevarthen First things first: infants make good use of the sympathetic rhythm of imitation, without reason or language , 2005 .

[43]  C. Heyes,et al.  Imitation in infancy: the wealth of the stimulus. , 2011, Developmental science.

[44]  R. Adolphs Conceptual Challenges and Directions for Social Neuroscience , 2010, Neuron.

[45]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Evolution, development and intentional control of imitation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  S. Hurley The shared circuits model (SCM): how control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[47]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Can social interaction constitute social cognition? , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.