Probing feature selectivity of neurons in primary visual cortex with natural stimuli

One way to characterize neural feature selectivity is to model the response probability as a nonlinear function of the output of a set of linear filters applied to incoming signals. Traditionally these linear filters are measured by probing neurons with correlated Gaussian noise ensembles and calculating correlation functions between incoming signals and neural responses. It is also important to derive these filters in response to natural stimuli, which have been shown to have strongly non-Gaussian spatiotemporal correlations. An information-theoretic method has been proposed recently for reconstructing neural filters using natural stimuli in which one looks for filters whose convolution with the stimulus ensemble accounts for the maximal possible part of the overall information carried the sequence of neural responses. Here we give a first-time demonstration of this method on real neural data, and compare responses of neurons in cat primary visual cortex driven with natural stimuli, noise ensembles, and moving gratings. We show that the information-theoretic method achieves the same quality of filter reconstruction for natural stimuli as that of well-established white-noise methods. Major parameters of neural filters derived from noise ensembles and natural stimuli, as well as from moving gratings are consistent with one another. We find that application of the reverse correlation method to natural stimuli ensembles leads to significant distortions in filters for a majority of studied cells with non-zero reverse-correlation filter.

[1]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. , 1993, Science.

[2]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[3]  Robert C. Liu,et al.  Variability and information in a neural code of the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  William Bialek,et al.  Analyzing Neural Responses to Natural Signals: Maximally Informative Dimensions , 2002, Neural Computation.

[5]  David J. Field,et al.  What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding? , 1994, Neural Computation.

[6]  K. Sen,et al.  Spectral-temporal Receptive Fields of Nonlinear Auditory Neurons Obtained Using Natural Sounds , 2022 .

[7]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[8]  A. A Emondi,et al.  Tracking neurons recorded from tetrodes across time , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  A subspace reverse-correlation technique for the study of visual neurons , 1997, Vision Research.

[10]  William Bialek,et al.  Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: coding and information transfer in short spike sequences , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[11]  P Kuyper,et al.  Triggered correlation. , 1968, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[12]  J. Touryan,et al.  Isolation of Relevant Visual Features from Random Stimuli for Cortical Complex Cells , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Ruderman The statistics of natural images , 1994 .

[14]  William Bialek,et al.  The Information Content of Receptive Fields , 2003, Neuron.

[15]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Characterizing Neural Gain Control using Spike-triggered Covariance , 2001, NIPS.

[16]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Convergence properties of three spike-triggered analysis techniques , 2003, NIPS.

[18]  William Bialek,et al.  Adaptive Rescaling Maximizes Information Transmission , 2000, Neuron.

[19]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  N. C. Singh,et al.  Estimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli , 2001 .

[22]  J. Atick,et al.  STATISTICS OF NATURAL TIME-VARYING IMAGES , 1995 .

[23]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[24]  K. Sen,et al.  Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  William Bialek,et al.  Synergy in a Neural Code , 2000, Neural Computation.

[26]  E J Chichilnisky,et al.  A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses , 2001, Network.

[27]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[28]  D. C. Essen,et al.  Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.