Safe and effective physical human-robot interaction : approaches to variable compliance via soft joints and soft grippers

The work described in this thesis focusses on designing and building two novel physical devices in a robotic arm structure. The arm is intended for human-robot interaction in the domestic assistive robotics area. The first device aims at helping to ensure the safety of the human user. It acts as a mechanical fuse and disconnects the robotic arm link from its motor in case of collision. The device behaves in a rigid manner in normal operational times and in a compliant manner in case of potentially harmful collisions: it relies on a variable compliance. The second device is the end-effector of the robotic arm. It is a novel grasping device that aims at accommodating varying object shapes. This is achieved by the structure of the grasping device that is a soft structure with a compliant and a rigid phase. Its completely soft structure is able to mould to the object's shape in the compliant phase, while the rigid phase allows holding the object in a stable way. In this study, variable compliance is defined as a physical structure's change from a compliant to a rigid behaviour and vice versa. Due to its versatility and effectiveness, variable compliance has become the founding block of the design of the two devices in the robot arm physical structure. The novelty of the employment of variable compliance in this thesis resides in its use in both rigid and soft devices in order to help ensure both safety and adaptable grasping in one integrated physical structure, the robot arm. The safety device has been designed, modelled, produced, tested and physically embedded in the robot arm system. Compared to previous work in this field, the feature described in this thesis' work has a major advantage: its torque threshold can be actively regulated depending on the operational situation. The threshold torque is best described by an exponential curve in the mathematical model while it is best fit by a second order equation in the experimental data. The mismatch is more considerable for high values of threshold torque. However, both curves reflect that threshold torque magnitude increases by increasing the setting of the device. Testing of both the passive decoupling and active threshold torque regulation show that both are successfully obtained. The second novel feature of the robot arm is the soft grasping device inspired by hydrostatic skeletons. Its ability to passively adapts to complex shapes objects, reduces the complexity of the grasping action control. This gripper is low-cost, soft, cable-driven and it features no stiff sections. Its versatility, variable compliance and stable grasp are shown in several experiments. A model of the forward kinematics of the system is derived from observation of its bending behaviour. Variable compliance has shown to be a very relevant principle for the design and implementation of a robotic arm aimed at safely interacting with human users and that can reduce grasp control complexity by passively adapting to the object's shape.

[1]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  New insights concerning intrinsic joint elasticity for safety , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  Jae-Bok Song,et al.  Safe robot arm with safe joint mechanism using nonlinear spring system for collision safety , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  On a new generation of torque controlled light-weight robots , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[4]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The KUKA-DLR Lightweight Robot arm - a new reference platform for robotics research and manufacturing , 2010, ISR/ROBOTIK.

[5]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Biological Inspiration for Musclelike Actuators of Robots , 2003 .

[6]  T. Pipe,et al.  Towards a variable compliance hydrostatic skeleton inspired gripper , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[7]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Field trials and testing of the OctArm continuum manipulator , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[8]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Oliver Brock,et al.  A compliant hand based on a novel pneumatic actuator , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Oskar von Stryk,et al.  BioRob-Arm: A Quickly Deployable and Intrinsically Safe, Light- Weight Robot Arm for Service Robotics Applications , 2010, ISR/ROBOTIK.

[11]  P. Festy,et al.  Populations and Demographic Trends of European Countries, 1980-2010 , 2011 .

[12]  Jae-Bok Song,et al.  Safe Link Mechanism based on Passive Compliance for Safe Human-Robot Collision , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  A New Actuation Approach for Human Friendly Robot Design , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Soft robotics for chemists. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[15]  John J. Craig,et al.  Hybrid position/force control of manipulators , 1981 .

[16]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research , 2008 .

[17]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Study and fabrication of bioinspired Octopus arm mockups tested on a multipurpose platform , 2010, 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[18]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Closed-Form Inverse Kinematics for Continuum Manipulators , 2009, Adv. Robotics.

[19]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Collision detection and reaction: A contribution to safe physical Human-Robot Interaction , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[20]  Shinichi Hirai,et al.  Pressure control valve for McKibben artificial muscle actuators with miniaturized unconstrained pneumatic on/off valves , 2009, 2009 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.

[21]  A. G. Pipe,et al.  A variable compliance, soft gripper , 2014, Auton. Robots.

[22]  Dirk Lefeber,et al.  Pneumatic artificial muscles: Actuators for robotics and automation , 2002 .

[23]  Srinivas Neppalli,et al.  Design, construction, and analysis of a continuum robot , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[24]  W. Kier The diversity of hydrostatic skeletons , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  Jae-Bok Song,et al.  Safe joint mechanism based on nonlinear stiffness for safe human-robot collision , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[26]  W. Kier,et al.  Mechanical properties of the rigid and hydrostatic skeletons of molting blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus Rathbun , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[27]  Oskar von Stryk,et al.  Simulation of dynamics and realistic contact forces for manipulators and legged robots with high joint elasticity , 2011, 2011 15th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR).

[28]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Variable impedance actuators: A review , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[29]  Kai Xu,et al.  An Investigation of the Intrinsic Force Sensing Capabilities of Continuum Robots , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[30]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  Kinematically optimal hyper-redundant manipulator configurations , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[31]  Thomas Feix,et al.  A comprehensive grasp taxonomy , 2009 .

[32]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Kinematics for multisection continuum robots , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[33]  B. Mazzolai,et al.  Analysis and characterization of a robotic probe inspired by the plant root apex , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[34]  Francois Routhier,et al.  Evaluation of the JACO robotic arm: Clinico-economic study for powered wheelchair users with upper-extremity disabilities , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[35]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The DLR hand arm system , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[36]  Yoji Umetani,et al.  The Development of Soft Gripper for the Versatile Robot Hand , 1978 .

[37]  W. Kier,et al.  Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular‐hydrostats , 1985 .

[38]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  A Positive Pressure Universal Gripper Based on the Jamming of Granular Material , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[39]  Takeshi Aoki,et al.  Design of Slim Slime Robot II (SSR-II) with Bridle Bellows , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[40]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Shrinkable, stiffness-controllable soft manipulator based on a bio-inspired antagonistic actuation principle , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[41]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Robotic grasping and contact: a review , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[42]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  Design and Kinematic Modeling of Constant Curvature Continuum Robots: A Review , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[43]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Towards A Human-Centered Intrinsically-Safe Robotic Manipulator , 2002 .

[44]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics , 2007, Science.

[45]  Ferdi Başkurt,et al.  Comparison of Pressure Pain Threshold, Grip Strength, Dexterity and Touch Pressure of Dominant and Non-Dominant Hands within and Between Right- and Left-Handed Subjects , 2004, Journal of Korean medical science.

[46]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Mechanics Modeling of Tendon-Driven Continuum Manipulators , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[47]  Karl Iagnemma,et al.  Design and Analysis of a Robust, Low-cost, Highly Articulated manipulator enabled by jamming of granular media , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[48]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Requirements for Safe Robots: Measurements, Analysis and New Insights , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[49]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  Mechanics of Precurved-Tube Continuum Robots , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[50]  Koji Ikuta,et al.  Safety Evaluation Method of Design and Control for Human-Care Robots , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[51]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Development of a biomimetic miniature robotic crawler , 2006, Auton. Robots.

[52]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A position and stiffness control strategy for variable stiffness actuators , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[53]  Sanja Dogramadzi,et al.  Environmental Hazard Analysis - a Variant of Preliminary Hazard Analysis for Autonomous Mobile Robots , 2014, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[54]  Chris Rogers,et al.  Caterpillar locomotion: A new model for soft- bodied climbing and burrowing robots , 2006 .

[55]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  SAFETY ISSUES FOR HUMAN-ROBOT COOPERATION IN MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 2008 .

[56]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  A modular, open-source 3D printed underactuated hand , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[57]  DIANE A. KELLY,et al.  Penises as Variable‐Volume Hydrostatic Skeletons , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[58]  A. Bicchi,et al.  Physical human-robot interaction: Dependability, safety, and performance , 2008, 2008 10th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control.

[59]  J. Broekens,et al.  Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review , 2009 .

[60]  David M. Lane,et al.  The AMADEUS dextrous subsea hand: design, modeling, and sensor processing , 1999 .

[61]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Soft Robot Arm Inspired by the Octopus , 2012, Adv. Robotics.

[62]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[63]  L. Siciliano Modelling and Control of Robot Manipulators , 2000 .

[64]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Configuration Tracking for Continuum Manipulators With Coupled Tendon Drive , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[65]  Roger D. Quinn,et al.  A hydrostatic robot for marine applications , 2000, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[66]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  On joint design with intrinsic variable compliance: derivation of the DLR QA-Joint , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[67]  K. Hirata Development of Experimental Fish Robot , 2000 .

[68]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Tendon and pressure actuation for a bio-inspired manipulator based on an antagonistic principle , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[69]  Britta Geissler,et al.  Measuring mechanical pain: The refinement and standardization of pressure pain threshold measurements , 2015, Behavior research methods.

[70]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  The Highly Adaptive SDM Hand: Design and Performance Evaluation , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[71]  W. Kier,et al.  Switching Skeletons: Hydrostatic Support in Molting Crabs , 2003, Science.