The organization of visual object representations: a connectionist model of effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex

We have developed a simple connectionist model based on the idea that perirhinal cortex has properties similar to other regions in the ventral visual stream, or ‘what’ pathway. The model is based on the assumption that representations in the ventral visual stream are organized hierarchically, such that representations of simple features of objects are stored in caudal regions of the ventral visual stream, and representations of the conjunctions of these features are stored in more rostral regions. We propose that a function of these feature conjunction representations is to help to resolve ‘feature ambiguity’, a property of visual discrimination problems that can emerge when features of an object predict a given outcome (e.g. reward) when part of one object, but predict a different outcome when part of another object. Several recently reported effects of lesions of perirhinal cortex in monkeys have provided key insights into the functions of this region. In the present study these effects were simulated by comparing the performance of connectionist networks before and after removal of a layer of units corresponding to perirhinal cortex. The results of these simulations suggest that effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex on visual discrimination may be due not to the impairment of a specific type of learning or memory, such as declarative or procedural, but to compromising the representations of visual stimuli. Furthermore, we propose that attempting to classify perirhinal cortex function as either ‘perceptual’ or ‘mnemonic’ may be misguided, as it seems unlikely that these broad constructs will map neatly onto anatomically defined regions of the brain.

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  É. D. L. Tour,et al.  Nouvelles observations concernant l’action du laurylsulfate de sodium sur la paroi et la membrane d’E. coli , 1965 .

[3]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[5]  N. Mackintosh The psychology of animal learning , 1974 .

[6]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[7]  David Gaffan,et al.  Visual Identification following Inferotemporal Ablation in the Monkey , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[9]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[10]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Dissociation of the effects of inferior temporal and limbic lesions on object discrimination learning with 24-h intertrial intervals , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia , 1989, Psychobiology.

[12]  D. Amaral,et al.  Lesions of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  L. F. Kromer,et al.  Object recognition memory in the rat: the role of the hippocampus , 1991, Behavioural Brain Research.

[14]  L. Squire Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[15]  E. Murray,et al.  Monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) with rhinal cortex ablations succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hr intertrial intervals and fail at matching to sample despite double sample presentations. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  D. Amaral,et al.  Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in the monkey produce long-lasting memory impairment in the visual and tactual modalities , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Neurophysiology of shape processing , 1993, Image Vis. Comput..

[18]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Memory and imagery in the temporal lobe , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Amaral,et al.  Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: Cortical afferents , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  Seth J. Ramus,et al.  Severity of memory impairment in monkeys as a function of locus and extent of damage within the medial temporal lobe memory system , 1994, Hippocampus.

[22]  G. Kane Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[23]  D. Mumby,et al.  Rhinal cortex lesions and object recognition in rats. , 1994, Behavioral neuroscience.

[24]  M. Gluck,et al.  Representation and Association in Memory: A Neurocomputational View of Hippocampal Function , 1995 .

[25]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  On the Binding of Associations in Memory: Clues From Studies on the Role of the Hippocampal Region in Paired-Associate Learning , 1995 .

[26]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Interaction of Perirhinal Cortex with the Fornix–Fimbria: Memory for Objects and “Object-in-Place” Memory , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Impairment of visual object-discrimination learning after perirhinal cortex ablation. , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[28]  E. Rolls,et al.  INVARIANT FACE AND OBJECT RECOGNITION IN THE VISUAL SYSTEM , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.

[29]  E. Murray,et al.  Rhinal Cortex Removal Produces Amnesia for Preoperatively Learned Discrimination Problems But Fails to Disrupt Postoperative Acquisition and Retention in Rhesus Monkeys , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  T. Bussey,et al.  Extensive Cytotoxic Lesions Involving Both the Rhinal Cortices and Area TE Impair Recognition But Spare Spatial Alternation in the Rat , 1997, Brain Research Bulletin.

[31]  L R Squire,et al.  A reexamination of the concurrent discrimination learning task: the importance of anterior inferotemporal cortex, area TE. , 1998, Behavioral neuroscience.

[32]  Memory systems in primates: episodic, semantic, and perceptual learning , 1998 .

[33]  L. Squire,et al.  The human perirhinal cortex and recognition memory , 1998, Hippocampus.

[34]  D. Mumby,et al.  Place memory is intact in rats with perirhinal cortex lesions. , 1998, Behavioral neuroscience.

[35]  T. Bussey,et al.  Fornix Lesions Can Facilitate Acquisition of the Transverse Patterning Task: A Challenge for “Configural” Theories of Hippocampal Function , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Object Recognition and Location Memory in Monkeys with Excitotoxic Lesions of the Amygdala and Hippocampus , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Perirhinal cortex ablation impairs configural learning and paired–associate learning equally , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  L. Squire,et al.  A reexamination of the concurrent discrimination learning task , 1998 .

[39]  T. Bussey,et al.  Functionally Dissociating Aspects of Event Memory: the Effects of Combined Perirhinal and Postrhinal Cortex Lesions on Object and Place Memory in the Rat , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  T. Bussey,et al.  Perceptual–mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Seth J. Ramus,et al.  Dissociation between the effects of damage to perirhinal cortex and area TE. , 1999, Learning & memory.

[43]  T. Bussey,et al.  Distinct patterns of behavioural impairments resulting from fornix transection or neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal and postrhinal cortices in the rat , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  L R Squire,et al.  Perception and recognition memory in monkeys following lesions of area TE and perirhinal cortex. , 2000, Learning & memory.

[45]  E. Murray Memory for objects in nonhuman primates , 2000 .

[46]  John P. Aggleton,et al.  Intact negative patterning in rats with fornix or combined perirhinal and postrhinal cortex lesions , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  T. Bussey,et al.  Perirhinal cortex and place-object conditional learning in the rat. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[48]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: principles of cortical and hippocampal function. , 2001, Psychological review.

[49]  E. Murray,et al.  Opposite relationship of hippocampal and rhinal cortex damage to delayed nonmatching‐to‐sample deficits in monkeys † , 2001, Hippocampus.

[50]  Y. Yamane,et al.  Complex objects are represented in macaque inferotemporal cortex by the combination of feature columns , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  L. Saksida,et al.  Perirhinal cortex resolves feature ambiguity in complex visual discriminations , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[52]  The 'what' and 'where' of event memory: Independence and interactivity within the medial temporal lobe , 2002 .

[53]  C. Gross,et al.  Effects of foveal prestriate and inferotemporal lesions on visual discrimination by rhesus monkeys , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  Kunihiko Fukushima,et al.  Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position , 1980, Biological Cybernetics.

[55]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Dissociated effects of perirhinal cortex ablation, fornix transection and amygdalectomy: evidence for multiple memory systems in the primate temporal lobe , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.