Discussion Prompts to Support Family Engagement in Science: Talking about Astroengineering in Library-based Making Programs

Situated within a three-year design-based research project, this case study investigates how families learned about astroengineering. Eleven families (11 adults, 12 children) engaged in activities related to making a lunar rover in four library programs. To support their engagement in design tasks and engineering thinking, think-pair-share discussion prompts were employed between two- and four-times during workshops. Analyses of the implementation of the prompts by the astronomer leading the program and the family talk that resulted from the prompts found that parents were integral to supporting participation in the engineering activities. Youths often did not answer the astronomer's questions directly; instead, the parents re-voiced the prompts prior to the youths' engagement. The family prompts supported reflecting upon prior experiences, defining the design problem, and maintaining the activity flow.

[1]  Sahana Murthy,et al.  Effect of think-pair-share in a large CS1 class: 83% sustained engagement , 2013, ICER.

[2]  Adekunle Oladipupo Bamiro,et al.  Effects of Guided Discovery and Think-Pair-Share Strategies on Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Chemistry , 2015 .

[3]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  Life in the Times of Whypox: A Virtual Epidemic as a Community Event , 2007 .

[4]  Aran W. Glancy,et al.  A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education: Research and Development , 2014 .

[5]  K. Crowley,et al.  Building Islands of Expertise in Everyday Family Activity , 2002 .

[6]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning , 1998 .

[7]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The Knowledge Integration Perspective on Learning and Instruction , 2005 .

[8]  Kevin Crowley,et al.  Learning As Conversational Elaboration : A Proposal to Capture , Code , and Analyze Talk in Museums , 2000 .

[9]  E. W. Banios.  Teaching engineering practices , 1991, Proceedings Frontiers in Education Twenty-First Annual Conference. Engineering Education in a New World Order.

[10]  G. Hein.  Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits , 2009 .

[11]  J. Falk.  An Identity‐Centered Approach to Understanding Museum Learning , 2006 .

[12]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in A Digital World , 1996 .

[13]  Helen R. Quinn.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education , 2012 .

[14]  Ricki Goldman,et al.  Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics , 2010 .

[15]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Parents' Assistance of Their Children's Scientific Reasoning. , 1999 .

[16]  Rosemary S. Russ,et al.  Defining sensemaking: Bringing clarity to a fragmented theoretical construct , 2018, Science Education.

[17]  Breanne K. Litts,et al.  Learning in the Making: A Comparative Case Study of Three Makerspaces. , 2014 .

[18]  A. King,et al.  Effects of Guided Cooperative Questioning on Children's Knowledge Construction. , 1993 .

[19]  W. McComas.  Framework for K-12 Science Education , 2014 .

[20]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[21]  Sue Allen,et al.  Looking for Learning in Visitor Talk: A Methodological Exploration , 2003 .

[22]  Anirban Roychowdhury,et al.  Investigation of charge transport properties in less defective nanostructured ZnO based Schottky diode , 2015 .

[23]  Heather Toomey Zimmerman,et al.  Understanding How Families Use Magnifiers During Nature Center Walks , 2013 .

[24]  A. King.  Facilitating Elaborative Learning Through Guided Student-Generated Questioning , 1992 .

[25]  Susan M. Land,et al.  A Qualitative Analysis of Scaffolding Use in a Resource-Based Learning Environment Involving the World Wide Web , 2000 .

[26]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions , 2003 .

[27]  Mike Petrich,et al.  Learning Through STEM-Rich Tinkering: Findings From a Jointly Negotiated Research Project Taken Up in Practice , 2015 .

[28]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE , 2000 .

[29]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Developing Scientific Communities in Classrooms: A Sociocognitive Approach , 1999 .

[30]  P. Katz,et al.  Stability and Change in Science Education -- Meeting Basic Learning Needs , 2018 .

[31]  Jay McTighe,et al.  Cueing Thinking in the Classroom: The Promise of Theory-Embedded Tools. , 1988 .

[32]  Doris Ash.  Negotiations of Thematic Conversations About Biology , 2003 .

[33]  Philip Bell,et al.  Family sense‐making practices in science center conversations , 2010 .