Structural Improvement Filtering Strategy for PRM

Sampling based motion planning methods have been highly successful in solving many high degree of freedom motion planning problems arising in diverse application domains such as traditional robotics, computer-aided design, and computational biology and chemistry. Recent work in metrics for sampling based planners provide tools to analyze the model building process at three levels of detail: sample level, region level, and global level. These tools are useful for comparing the evolution of sampling methods, and have shown promise to improve the process altogether [15], [17], [24]. Here, we introduce a filtering strategy for the Probabilistic Roadmap Methods (PRM) with the aim to improve roadmap construction performance by selecting only the samples that are likely to produce roadmap structure improvement. By measuring a new sample’s maximum potential structural improvement with respect to the current roadmap, we can choose to only accept samples that have an adequate potential for improvement. We show how this approach can improve the standard PRM framework in a variety of motion planning situations using popular sampling techniques.

[1]  Oliver Brock,et al.  Sampling-Based Motion Planning Using Predictive Models , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Using motion planning to study protein folding pathways , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[3]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Choosing good distance metrics and local planners for probabilistic roadmap methods , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[4]  John H. Reif,et al.  Complexity of the mover's problem and generalizations , 1979, 20th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1979).

[5]  Lydia Tapia,et al.  Simulating Protein Motions with Rigidity Analysis , 2007, J. Comput. Biol..

[6]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Incremental Map Generation (IMG) , 2006, WAFR.

[7]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Analysis of the Evolution of C-Space Models built through Incremental Exploration , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Using Motion Planning to Study RNA Folding Kinetics , 2005, J. Comput. Biol..

[9]  B. Faverjon,et al.  Probabilistic Roadmaps for Path Planning in High-Dimensional Con(cid:12)guration Spaces , 1996 .

[10]  Daniel Vallejo,et al.  OBPRM: an obstacle-based PRM for 3D workspaces , 1998 .

[11]  Lydia E. Kavraki,et al.  Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  Gildardo Sánchez-Ante,et al.  Hybrid PRM Sampling with a Cost-Sensitive Adaptive Strategy , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Lydia Tapia,et al.  A Machine Learning Approach for Feature-Sensitive Motion Planning , 2004, WAFR.

[14]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  A Motion Planning Approach to Flexible Ligand Binding , 1999, ISMB.

[15]  J. Laumond,et al.  Notes on Visibility Roadmaps and Path Planning , 2001 .

[16]  Mark H. Overmars,et al.  The Gaussian sampling strategy for probabilistic roadmap planners , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[17]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Enhancing Randomized Motion Planners: Exploring with Haptic Hints , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[18]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Ligand Binding with OBPRM and Haptic User Input: Enhancing Automatic Motion Planning with Virtual Touch , 2000 .

[19]  David Hsu,et al.  The bridge test for sampling narrow passages with probabilistic roadmap planners , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[20]  Thierry Siméon,et al.  Visibility based probabilistic roadmaps , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[21]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Shepherding behaviors , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[22]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Using Motion Planning to Study Protein Folding Pathways , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[23]  Lydia Tapia,et al.  C-space Subdivision and Integration in Feature-Sensitive Motion Planning , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[24]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Metrics for analyzing the evolution of C-space models , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[25]  Tsai-Yen Li,et al.  Assembly maintainability study with motion planning , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[26]  Nancy M. Amato,et al.  Shepherding Behaviors with Multiple Shepherds , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.