From automata to animate beings: the scope and limits of attributing socialness to artificial agents
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] N. Haslam,et al. Dehumanization and infrahumanization. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.
[2] Jacqueline Nadel,et al. Reading sadness beyond human faces , 2010, Brain Research.
[3] Vilayanur S. Ramachandran,et al. EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots , 2007, Neurocomputing.
[4] Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al. The Impact of Participants' Beliefs on Motor Interference and Motor Coordination in Human–Humanoid Interactions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.
[5] A. Hamilton,et al. Triangles have goals too: Understanding action representation in left aIPS , 2010, Neuropsychologia.
[6] B. Bahrami,et al. Individual differences in anthropomorphic attributions and human brain structure. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[7] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey , 2008, Neuron.
[8] Markus Lappe,et al. When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: corepresentation of robotic actions. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[9] E. Broadbent. Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves , 2017, Annual review of psychology.
[10] Susan T. Fiske,et al. From Agents to Objects: Sexist Attitudes and Neural Responses to Sexualized Targets , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[11] P. Schyns,et al. Measuring Internal Representations from Behavioral and Brain Data , 2012, Current Biology.
[12] Emily S. Cross,et al. Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.
[13] The uniquely human in human nature , 2004, Daedalus.
[14] Jamy Li,et al. The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[15] Angela R. Laird,et al. ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain , 2010, NeuroImage.
[16] Ewald Moser,et al. Amygdala activation at 3T in response to human and avatar facial expressions of emotions , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[17] A. Hamilton,et al. Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion , 2007, Social neuroscience.
[18] Christoph Bartneck,et al. Reciprocity in Human-Robot Interaction: A Quantitative Approach Through the Prisoner’s Dilemma and the Ultimatum Game , 2015, International Journal of Social Robotics.
[19] Emily S. Cross,et al. The Control of Automatic Imitation Based on Bottom–Up and Top–Down Cues to Animacy: Insights from Brain and Behavior , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[20] G. Cheng,et al. How do we think machines think? An fMRI study of alleged competition with an artificial intelligence , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[21] P. Mason,et al. A valence-free definition of sociality as any violation of inter-individual independence , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[22] Mathieu Vandenbulcke,et al. Affective scenes influence fear perception of individual body expressions , 2014, Human brain mapping.
[23] S. Quadflieg,et al. The neuroscience of people watching: how the human brain makes sense of other people's encounters , 2017, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[24] J. Nadel,et al. Human brain spots emotion in non humanoid robots. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[25] Clare Press,et al. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Action Observation and Robotic Agents: Learning and Anthropomorphism , 2022 .
[26] S. Tipper,et al. Young children perceive less humanness in outgroup faces. , 2018, Developmental science.
[27] R. Parasuraman,et al. An fMRI and effective connectivity study investigating miss errors during advice utilization from human and machine agents , 2017, Social neuroscience.
[28] Gregory McCarthy,et al. Perceived animacy influences the processing of human-like surface features in the fusiform gyrus , 2014, Neuropsychologia.
[29] C. Frith,et al. Mechanisms of social cognition. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.
[30] Jennifer A. Mangels,et al. Predictive Codes for Forthcoming Perception in the Frontal Cortex , 2006, Science.
[31] Robert P. Spunt,et al. The neural basis of understanding the expression of the emotions in man and animals , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[32] Gordon Cheng,et al. Human-humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? , 2004, 4th IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2004..
[33] 김제중. Biological Motion , 1990, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics.
[34] Mark H Johnson,et al. Biological Motion: A Perceptual Life Detector? , 2006, Current Biology.
[35] Jack L. Gallant,et al. A Continuous Semantic Space Describes the Representation of Thousands of Object and Action Categories across the Human Brain , 2012, Neuron.
[36] Karl J. Friston,et al. Activation in Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Parallels Parameter Inducing the Percept of Animacy , 2005, Neuron.
[37] Robert W Proctor,et al. Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[38] C. Frith,et al. Rapid Response Subject Collections , 2022 .
[39] Transcription Interference and ORF Nature Strongly Affect Promoter Strength in a Reconstituted Metabolic Pathway , 2015, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..
[40] C. Heyes,et al. Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[41] A. M. Turing,et al. Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.
[42] A. M. Turing,et al. Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.
[43] D. Wegner,et al. Dimensions of Mind Perception , 2007, Science.
[44] Floris P de Lange,et al. How the human brain goes virtual: distinct cortical regions of the person-processing network are involved in self-identification with virtual agents. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.
[45] Wen-Jui Kuo,et al. Action Co-representation is Tuned to Other Humans , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[46] Fumihide Tanaka,et al. Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[47] R. Adolphs,et al. Emotion Perception from Face, Voice, and Touch: Comparisons and Convergence , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[48] James Dungan,et al. Where in the brain is morality? Everywhere and maybe nowhere , 2012, Social neuroscience.
[49] Anthony I. Jack,et al. Seeing human: Distinct and overlapping neural signatures associated with two forms of dehumanization , 2013, NeuroImage.
[50] Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al. Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[51] P. Fletcher,et al. Seeing other minds: attributed mental states influence perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[52] Linda Chang,et al. Neural correlates for perception of companion animal photographs , 2016, Neuropsychologia.
[53] Y. Paulignan,et al. An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.
[54] T. Chaminade,et al. Motor interference between Humans and Humanoid Robots: Effect of Biological and Artificial Motion , 2005, Proceedings. The 4nd International Conference on Development and Learning, 2005..
[55] E. Poliakoff,et al. Believe it or not: Moving non-biological stimuli believed to have human origin can be represented as human movement , 2016, Cognition.
[56] B. Balas,et al. Visual adaptation of the perception of “life”: Animacy is a basic perceptual dimension of faces , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[57] M. Norton,et al. Botsourcing and outsourcing: Robot, British, Chinese, and German workers are for thinking--not feeling--jobs. , 2014, Emotion.
[58] Emily S. Cross,et al. Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network , 2012, Human brain mapping.
[59] K. M. Lee,et al. Effects of Physical Embodiment on Social Presence of Social Robots , 2004 .
[60] Varol Akman,et al. Turing Test: 50 Years Later , 2000, Minds and Machines.
[61] J. Cacioppo,et al. On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.
[62] S. Blakemore,et al. Atypical interference effect of action observation in autism spectrum conditions , 2013, Psychological Medicine.
[63] Emily S. Cross,et al. The Perception of Emotion in Artificial Agents , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.
[64] C. Nass,et al. Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices , 1997 .
[65] S. Huettel,et al. A Distinct Role of the Temporal-Parietal Junction in Predicting Socially Guided Decisions , 2012, Science.
[66] Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al. Attention modulates the specificity of automatic imitation to human actors , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.
[67] G. Cheng,et al. Social cognitive neuroscience and humanoid robotics , 2009, Journal of Physiology-Paris.
[68] Patrik Vuilleumier,et al. Neuroscience of human social interactions and adult attachment style , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[69] M. Bartlett,et al. Bridging the Mechanical and the Human Mind: Spontaneous Mimicry of a Physically Present Android , 2014, PloS one.
[70] J. Hodgins,et al. Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters' actions. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[71] C. Frith,et al. Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[72] C. Frith,et al. Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.
[73] A. Saygin,et al. The role of appearance and motion in action prediction , 2012, Psychological research.
[74] Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al. The Art of Designing Socially Intelligent Agents: Science, Fiction, and the Human in the Loop , 1998, Appl. Artif. Intell..
[75] Christian Keysers,et al. Expanding the mirror: vicarious activity for actions, emotions, and sensations , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[76] G. McArthur,et al. Beliefs about human agency influence the neural processing of gaze during joint attention , 2017, Social neuroscience.
[77] J. Mattingley,et al. Understanding the minds of others: A neuroimaging meta-analysis , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[78] D. Wegner,et al. Causes and consequences of mind perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[79] G. Cheng,et al. Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[80] S. Fiske,et al. Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low , 2006, Psychological science.
[81] N. Troje,et al. The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.
[82] H. Ishiguro,et al. The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[83] John E. Opfer,et al. Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: the case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change , 2002, Cognition.
[84] G. Johansson. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .
[85] U. Castiello,et al. The Human Premotor Cortex Is 'Mirror' Only for Biological Actions , 2004, Current Biology.
[86] Leonhard Schilbach,et al. Seeing minds: A neurophilosophical investigation of the role of perception-action coupling in social perception , 2012, Social neuroscience.
[87] Harriet Over,et al. Young Children Are More Likely to Spontaneously Attribute Mental States to Members of Their Own Group , 2017, Psychological science.
[88] Jan Zwickel,et al. I See What You Mean: How Attentional Selection Is Shaped by Ascribing Intentions to Others , 2012, PloS one.
[89] Kyveli Kompatsiari,et al. The Importance of Mutual Gaze in Human-Robot Interaction , 2017, ICSR.
[90] Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al. A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments , 2006, PloS one.
[91] James Everett Young,et al. Poor Thing! Would You Feel Sorry for a Simulated Robot? A comparison of empathy toward a physical and a simulated robot , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).
[92] N. Hadjikhani,et al. Early (M170) activation of face-specific cortex by face-like objects , 2009, Neuroreport.
[93] Carey K. Morewedge,et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Making Sense by Making Sentient : Effectance Motivation Increases , 2010 .
[94] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[95] Russell A. Poldrack,et al. Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data , 2011, Nature Methods.
[96] Jie Tian,et al. Seeing Jesus in toast: Neural and behavioral correlates of face pareidolia , 2014, Cortex.
[97] A. Meltzoff. 'Like me': a foundation for social cognition. , 2007, Developmental science.
[98] W. Prinz,et al. The imitative mind : development, evolution, and brain bases , 2002 .
[99] A. Meltzoff,et al. The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.
[100] F. Heider,et al. An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .
[101] P. Downing,et al. The neural basis of visual body perception , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[102] R. Parasuraman,et al. Advice Taking from Humans and Machines: An fMRI and Effective Connectivity Study , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[103] K. Vogeley,et al. Toward a second-person neuroscience 1 , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[104] L. Schilbach. Eye to eye, face to face and brain to brain: novel approaches to study the behavioral dynamics and neural mechanisms of social interactions , 2015, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.
[105] Susan C. Johnson. Detecting agents. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[106] Susan R. Fussell,et al. Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot–like Agent , 2008 .
[107] Lionel Bringoux,et al. Do Visual and Vestibular Inputs Compensate for Somatosensory Loss in the Perception of Spatial Orientation? Insights from a Deafferented Patient , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[108] R. Adolphs,et al. The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.
[109] D. De Rossi,et al. Can a Humanoid Face be Expressive? A Psychophysiological Investigation , 2015, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..
[110] Ravi Vaidyanathan,et al. Assessment of human response to robot facial expressions through visual evoked potentials , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.
[111] S. Brison. The Intentional Stance , 1989 .
[112] Christopher D. Frith,et al. Imaging the Intentional Stance in a Competitive Game , 2002, NeuroImage.
[113] G. Sandini,et al. Motor Contagion during Human-Human and Human-Robot Interaction , 2014, PloS one.
[114] Karl J. Friston,et al. Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.
[115] N. Haslam. Dehumanization: An Integrative Review , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[116] N. Kanwisher,et al. Perceiving social interactions in the posterior superior temporal sulcus , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[117] Friederike Anne Eyssel,et al. My robot is more human than yours: Effects of group membership on anthropomorphic judgments of social robots , 2011, IROS 2011.
[118] B. Gelder. Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[119] M. Schurz,et al. The rTPJ’s overarching cognitive function in networks for attention and theory of mind , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[120] C. Heyes,et al. Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[121] E Poliakoff,et al. How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence , 2012, Psychological Research.
[122] B. Hommel,et al. The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[123] Timothy R. Brick,et al. Is This Car Looking at You? How Anthropomorphism Predicts Fusiform Face Area Activation when Seeing Cars , 2014, PloS one.
[124] Emiliano Ricciardi,et al. Distinct Neural Systems Involved in Agency and Animacy Detection , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[125] B. de Gelder,et al. The many faces of the emotional body , 2014 .
[126] James Stanley,et al. Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[127] J. S. Guntupalli,et al. Multivoxel patterns in face-sensitive temporal regions reveal an encoding schema based on detecting life in a face. , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[128] R. Gregory,et al. Perceptual illusions and brain models , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[129] F. Binkofski,et al. Can Machines Think? Interaction and Perspective Taking with Robots Investigated via fMRI , 2008, PloS one.
[130] Lara Bardi,et al. The processing of social stimuli in early infancy: from faces to biological motion perception. , 2011, Progress in brain research.
[131] M. Brass,et al. Automatic Imitation: A Meta-Analysis , 2018, Psychological bulletin.
[132] Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[133] Mitsuo Kawato,et al. Activation of the Human Superior Temporal Gyrus during Observation of Goal Attribution by Intentional Objects , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[134] Francesco Ferrari,et al. Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.
[135] C. Heyes,et al. Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[136] L. Schilbach,et al. On the relationship of online and offline social cognition , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[137] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[138] Rebecca Saxe,et al. Localizing Pain Matrix and Theory of Mind networks with both verbal and non-verbal stimuli , 2015, NeuroImage.
[139] R. Gollub,et al. Patterns of Brain Activation when Mothers View Their Own Child and Dog: An fMRI Study , 2014, PloS one.
[140] F. Eyssel,et al. Social categorization of social robots: anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. , 2012, The British journal of social psychology.
[141] M. Candidi,et al. And Yet They Act Together: Interpersonal Perception Modulates Visuo-Motor Interference and Mutual Adjustments during a Joint-Grasping Task , 2012, PloS one.
[142] Ass,et al. Can computers be teammates? , 1996 .
[143] Marcel Brass,et al. Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy. , 2010, Experimental psychology.
[144] J. Mattingley,et al. Brain regions with mirror properties: A meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[145] C. Nass,et al. Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .
[146] Nadim Joni Shah,et al. Minds Made for Sharing: Initiating Joint Attention Recruits Reward-related Neurocircuitry , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[147] Alois Knoll,et al. Moving Just Like You: Motor Interference Depends on Similar Motility of Agent and Observer , 2012, PloS one.
[148] M. Brass,et al. Believing androids – fMRI activation in the right temporo-parietal junction is modulated by ascribing intentions to non-human agents , 2017, Social neuroscience.
[149] Josef Perner,et al. Specifying the brain anatomy underlying temporo‐parietal junction activations for theory of mind: A review using probabilistic atlases from different imaging modalities , 2017, Human brain mapping.
[150] Jun Hu,et al. Exploring the abuse of robots , 2008 .
[151] Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al. EEG theta and Mu oscillations during perception of human and robot actions , 2013, Front. Neurorobot..
[152] Friederike Eyssel,et al. Minimal Group - Maximal Effect? Evaluation and Anthropomorphization of the Humanoid Robot NAO , 2011, ICSR.
[153] Christian A. Gonzalez,et al. Seeing Minds in Others – Can Agents with Robotic Appearance Have Human-Like Preferences? , 2016, PloS one.
[154] R. Blake,et al. Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.
[155] Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[156] Fred D. Davis,et al. Trusting Humans and Avatars: A Brain Imaging Study Based on Evolution Theory , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[157] Rainer Goebel,et al. How affective information from faces and scenes interacts in the brain. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[158] T. Allison,et al. Brain Activity Evoked by the Perception of Human Walking: Controlling for Meaningful Coherent Motion , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[159] Susanne Quadflieg,et al. In our own image? Emotional and neural processing differences when observing human–human vs human–robot interactions , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[160] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Brain Response to a Humanoid Robot in Areas Implicated in the Perception of Human Emotional Gestures , 2010, PloS one.
[161] Christian Keysers,et al. The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.
[162] E. Wiese,et al. Beliefs about the Minds of Others Influence How We Process Sensory Information , 2014, PloS one.
[163] Daniel Houser,et al. A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[164] A. Cohen,et al. Assigning economic value to people results in dehumanization brain response. , 2014 .
[165] Kai Vogeley,et al. Why we interact: On the functional role of the striatum in the subjective experience of social interaction , 2014, NeuroImage.
[166] Scott T. Grafton,et al. Goal Representation in Human Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[167] Sonya S. Kwak,et al. What makes people empathize with an emotional robot?: The impact of agency and physical embodiment on human empathy for a robot , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.
[168] J. Perner,et al. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Fractionating Theory of Mind: a Meta-analysis of Functional Brain Imaging Studies , 2022 .
[169] James Stanley,et al. How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency , 2010, NeuroImage.
[170] Emily S. Cross,et al. The shaping of social perception by stimulus and knowledge cues to human animacy , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[171] N. Haslam,et al. More human than you: attributing humanness to self and others. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[172] Kendrick Kay,et al. The Functional Neuroanatomy of Human Face Perception. , 2017, Annual review of vision science.
[173] Martin A. Giese,et al. Prejudiced interactions: implicit racial bias reduces predictive simulation during joint action with an out-group avatar , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[174] Burcu A. Urgen,et al. Observation and imitation of actions performed by humans, androids, and robots: an EMG study , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[175] S. Huettel,et al. A nexus model of the temporal–parietal junction , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[176] Cecilia Heyes,et al. Bottom‐up, not top‐down, modulation of imitation by human and robotic models , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.