From automata to animate beings: the scope and limits of attributing socialness to artificial agents

Understanding the mechanisms and consequences of attributing socialness to artificial agents has important implications for how we can use technology to lead more productive and fulfilling lives. Here, we integrate recent findings on the factors that shape behavioral and brain mechanisms that support social interactions between humans and artificial agents. We review how visual features of an agent, as well as knowledge factors within the human observer, shape attributions across dimensions of socialness. We explore how anthropomorphism and dehumanization further influence how we perceive and interact with artificial agents. Based on these findings, we argue that the cognitive reconstruction within the human observer is likely to be far more crucial in shaping our interactions with artificial agents than previously thought, while the artificial agent's visual features are possibly of lesser importance. We combine these findings to provide an integrative theoretical account based on the “like me” hypothesis, and discuss the key role played by the Theory‐of‐Mind network, especially the temporal parietal junction, in the shift from mechanistic to social attributions. We conclude by highlighting outstanding questions on the impact of long‐term interactions with artificial agents on the behavioral and brain mechanisms of attributing socialness to these agents.

[1]  N. Haslam,et al.  Dehumanization and infrahumanization. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  Jacqueline Nadel,et al.  Reading sadness beyond human faces , 2010, Brain Research.

[3]  Vilayanur S. Ramachandran,et al.  EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[4]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  The Impact of Participants' Beliefs on Motor Interference and Motor Coordination in Human–Humanoid Interactions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[5]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Triangles have goals too: Understanding action representation in left aIPS , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  B. Bahrami,et al.  Individual differences in anthropomorphic attributions and human brain structure. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[7]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey , 2008, Neuron.

[8]  Markus Lappe,et al.  When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: corepresentation of robotic actions. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  E. Broadbent Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves , 2017, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  From Agents to Objects: Sexist Attitudes and Neural Responses to Sexualized Targets , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  P. Schyns,et al.  Measuring Internal Representations from Behavioral and Brain Data , 2012, Current Biology.

[12]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  The uniquely human in human nature , 2004, Daedalus.

[14]  Jamy Li,et al.  The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain , 2010, NeuroImage.

[16]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Amygdala activation at 3T in response to human and avatar facial expressions of emotions , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion , 2007, Social neuroscience.

[18]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Reciprocity in Human-Robot Interaction: A Quantitative Approach Through the Prisoner’s Dilemma and the Ultimatum Game , 2015, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[19]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The Control of Automatic Imitation Based on Bottom–Up and Top–Down Cues to Animacy: Insights from Brain and Behavior , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  G. Cheng,et al.  How do we think machines think? An fMRI study of alleged competition with an artificial intelligence , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  P. Mason,et al.  A valence-free definition of sociality as any violation of inter-individual independence , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Mathieu Vandenbulcke,et al.  Affective scenes influence fear perception of individual body expressions , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[23]  S. Quadflieg,et al.  The neuroscience of people watching: how the human brain makes sense of other people's encounters , 2017, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  J. Nadel,et al.  Human brain spots emotion in non humanoid robots. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[25]  Clare Press,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Action Observation and Robotic Agents: Learning and Anthropomorphism , 2022 .

[26]  S. Tipper,et al.  Young children perceive less humanness in outgroup faces. , 2018, Developmental science.

[27]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  An fMRI and effective connectivity study investigating miss errors during advice utilization from human and machine agents , 2017, Social neuroscience.

[28]  Gregory McCarthy,et al.  Perceived animacy influences the processing of human-like surface features in the fusiform gyrus , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  C. Frith,et al.  Mechanisms of social cognition. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Predictive Codes for Forthcoming Perception in the Frontal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[31]  Robert P. Spunt,et al.  The neural basis of understanding the expression of the emotions in man and animals , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[32]  Gordon Cheng,et al.  Human-humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? , 2004, 4th IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2004..

[33]  김제중 Biological Motion , 1990, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics.

[34]  Mark H Johnson,et al.  Biological Motion: A Perceptual Life Detector? , 2006, Current Biology.

[35]  Jack L. Gallant,et al.  A Continuous Semantic Space Describes the Representation of Thousands of Object and Action Categories across the Human Brain , 2012, Neuron.

[36]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation in Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Parallels Parameter Inducing the Percept of Animacy , 2005, Neuron.

[37]  Robert W Proctor,et al.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  C. Frith,et al.  Rapid Response Subject Collections , 2022 .

[39]  Transcription Interference and ORF Nature Strongly Affect Promoter Strength in a Reconstituted Metabolic Pathway , 2015, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[40]  C. Heyes,et al.  Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[42]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[43]  D. Wegner,et al.  Dimensions of Mind Perception , 2007, Science.

[44]  Floris P de Lange,et al.  How the human brain goes virtual: distinct cortical regions of the person-processing network are involved in self-identification with virtual agents. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  Wen-Jui Kuo,et al.  Action Co-representation is Tuned to Other Humans , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Fumihide Tanaka,et al.  Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Emotion Perception from Face, Voice, and Touch: Comparisons and Convergence , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  James Dungan,et al.  Where in the brain is morality? Everywhere and maybe nowhere , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[49]  Anthony I. Jack,et al.  Seeing human: Distinct and overlapping neural signatures associated with two forms of dehumanization , 2013, NeuroImage.

[50]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  P. Fletcher,et al.  Seeing other minds: attributed mental states influence perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Linda Chang,et al.  Neural correlates for perception of companion animal photographs , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[54]  T. Chaminade,et al.  Motor interference between Humans and Humanoid Robots: Effect of Biological and Artificial Motion , 2005, Proceedings. The 4nd International Conference on Development and Learning, 2005..

[55]  E. Poliakoff,et al.  Believe it or not: Moving non-biological stimuli believed to have human origin can be represented as human movement , 2016, Cognition.

[56]  B. Balas,et al.  Visual adaptation of the perception of “life”: Animacy is a basic perceptual dimension of faces , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  M. Norton,et al.  Botsourcing and outsourcing: Robot, British, Chinese, and German workers are for thinking--not feeling--jobs. , 2014, Emotion.

[58]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[59]  K. M. Lee,et al.  Effects of Physical Embodiment on Social Presence of Social Robots , 2004 .

[60]  Varol Akman,et al.  Turing Test: 50 Years Later , 2000, Minds and Machines.

[61]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[62]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Atypical interference effect of action observation in autism spectrum conditions , 2013, Psychological Medicine.

[63]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The Perception of Emotion in Artificial Agents , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.

[64]  C. Nass,et al.  Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices , 1997 .

[65]  S. Huettel,et al.  A Distinct Role of the Temporal-Parietal Junction in Predicting Socially Guided Decisions , 2012, Science.

[66]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Attention modulates the specificity of automatic imitation to human actors , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[67]  G. Cheng,et al.  Social cognitive neuroscience and humanoid robotics , 2009, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[68]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Neuroscience of human social interactions and adult attachment style , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[69]  M. Bartlett,et al.  Bridging the Mechanical and the Human Mind: Spontaneous Mimicry of a Physically Present Android , 2014, PloS one.

[70]  J. Hodgins,et al.  Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters' actions. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[71]  C. Frith,et al.  Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[72]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[73]  A. Saygin,et al.  The role of appearance and motion in action prediction , 2012, Psychological research.

[74]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  The Art of Designing Socially Intelligent Agents: Science, Fiction, and the Human in the Loop , 1998, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[75]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Expanding the mirror: vicarious activity for actions, emotions, and sensations , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[76]  G. McArthur,et al.  Beliefs about human agency influence the neural processing of gaze during joint attention , 2017, Social neuroscience.

[77]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Understanding the minds of others: A neuroimaging meta-analysis , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[78]  D. Wegner,et al.  Causes and consequences of mind perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[79]  G. Cheng,et al.  Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[80]  S. Fiske,et al.  Dehumanizing the Lowest of the Low , 2006, Psychological science.

[81]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.

[82]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[83]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: the case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change , 2002, Cognition.

[84]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[85]  U. Castiello,et al.  The Human Premotor Cortex Is 'Mirror' Only for Biological Actions , 2004, Current Biology.

[86]  Leonhard Schilbach,et al.  Seeing minds: A neurophilosophical investigation of the role of perception-action coupling in social perception , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[87]  Harriet Over,et al.  Young Children Are More Likely to Spontaneously Attribute Mental States to Members of Their Own Group , 2017, Psychological science.

[88]  Jan Zwickel,et al.  I See What You Mean: How Attentional Selection Is Shaped by Ascribing Intentions to Others , 2012, PloS one.

[89]  Kyveli Kompatsiari,et al.  The Importance of Mutual Gaze in Human-Robot Interaction , 2017, ICSR.

[90]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments , 2006, PloS one.

[91]  James Everett Young,et al.  Poor Thing! Would You Feel Sorry for a Simulated Robot? A comparison of empathy toward a physical and a simulated robot , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[92]  N. Hadjikhani,et al.  Early (M170) activation of face-specific cortex by face-like objects , 2009, Neuroreport.

[93]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Making Sense by Making Sentient : Effectance Motivation Increases , 2010 .

[94]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[95]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data , 2011, Nature Methods.

[96]  Jie Tian,et al.  Seeing Jesus in toast: Neural and behavioral correlates of face pareidolia , 2014, Cortex.

[97]  A. Meltzoff 'Like me': a foundation for social cognition. , 2007, Developmental science.

[98]  W. Prinz,et al.  The imitative mind : development, evolution, and brain bases , 2002 .

[99]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[100]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[101]  P. Downing,et al.  The neural basis of visual body perception , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[102]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  Advice Taking from Humans and Machines: An fMRI and Effective Connectivity Study , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[103]  K. Vogeley,et al.  Toward a second-person neuroscience 1 , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[104]  L. Schilbach Eye to eye, face to face and brain to brain: novel approaches to study the behavioral dynamics and neural mechanisms of social interactions , 2015, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[105]  Susan C. Johnson Detecting agents. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[106]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot–like Agent , 2008 .

[107]  Lionel Bringoux,et al.  Do Visual and Vestibular Inputs Compensate for Somatosensory Loss in the Perception of Spatial Orientation? Insights from a Deafferented Patient , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[108]  R. Adolphs,et al.  The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[109]  D. De Rossi,et al.  Can a Humanoid Face be Expressive? A Psychophysiological Investigation , 2015, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[110]  Ravi Vaidyanathan,et al.  Assessment of human response to robot facial expressions through visual evoked potentials , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[111]  S. Brison The Intentional Stance , 1989 .

[112]  Christopher D. Frith,et al.  Imaging the Intentional Stance in a Competitive Game , 2002, NeuroImage.

[113]  G. Sandini,et al.  Motor Contagion during Human-Human and Human-Robot Interaction , 2014, PloS one.

[114]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[115]  N. Haslam Dehumanization: An Integrative Review , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[116]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Perceiving social interactions in the posterior superior temporal sulcus , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[117]  Friederike Anne Eyssel,et al.  My robot is more human than yours: Effects of group membership on anthropomorphic judgments of social robots , 2011, IROS 2011.

[118]  B. Gelder Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[119]  M. Schurz,et al.  The rTPJ’s overarching cognitive function in networks for attention and theory of mind , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[120]  C. Heyes,et al.  Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[121]  E Poliakoff,et al.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence , 2012, Psychological Research.

[122]  B. Hommel,et al.  The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[123]  Timothy R. Brick,et al.  Is This Car Looking at You? How Anthropomorphism Predicts Fusiform Face Area Activation when Seeing Cars , 2014, PloS one.

[124]  Emiliano Ricciardi,et al.  Distinct Neural Systems Involved in Agency and Animacy Detection , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[125]  B. de Gelder,et al.  The many faces of the emotional body , 2014 .

[126]  James Stanley,et al.  Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[127]  J. S. Guntupalli,et al.  Multivoxel patterns in face-sensitive temporal regions reveal an encoding schema based on detecting life in a face. , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[128]  R. Gregory,et al.  Perceptual illusions and brain models , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[129]  F. Binkofski,et al.  Can Machines Think? Interaction and Perspective Taking with Robots Investigated via fMRI , 2008, PloS one.

[130]  Lara Bardi,et al.  The processing of social stimuli in early infancy: from faces to biological motion perception. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[131]  M. Brass,et al.  Automatic Imitation: A Meta-Analysis , 2018, Psychological bulletin.

[132]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[133]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Activation of the Human Superior Temporal Gyrus during Observation of Goal Attribution by Intentional Objects , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[134]  Francesco Ferrari,et al.  Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[135]  C. Heyes,et al.  Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[136]  L. Schilbach,et al.  On the relationship of online and offline social cognition , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[137]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[138]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  Localizing Pain Matrix and Theory of Mind networks with both verbal and non-verbal stimuli , 2015, NeuroImage.

[139]  R. Gollub,et al.  Patterns of Brain Activation when Mothers View Their Own Child and Dog: An fMRI Study , 2014, PloS one.

[140]  F. Eyssel,et al.  Social categorization of social robots: anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. , 2012, The British journal of social psychology.

[141]  M. Candidi,et al.  And Yet They Act Together: Interpersonal Perception Modulates Visuo-Motor Interference and Mutual Adjustments during a Joint-Grasping Task , 2012, PloS one.

[142]  Ass,et al.  Can computers be teammates? , 1996 .

[143]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Top-down modulation of motor priming by belief about animacy. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[144]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Brain regions with mirror properties: A meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[145]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[146]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Minds Made for Sharing: Initiating Joint Attention Recruits Reward-related Neurocircuitry , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[147]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Moving Just Like You: Motor Interference Depends on Similar Motility of Agent and Observer , 2012, PloS one.

[148]  M. Brass,et al.  Believing androids – fMRI activation in the right temporo-parietal junction is modulated by ascribing intentions to non-human agents , 2017, Social neuroscience.

[149]  Josef Perner,et al.  Specifying the brain anatomy underlying temporo‐parietal junction activations for theory of mind: A review using probabilistic atlases from different imaging modalities , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[150]  Jun Hu,et al.  Exploring the abuse of robots , 2008 .

[151]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  EEG theta and Mu oscillations during perception of human and robot actions , 2013, Front. Neurorobot..

[152]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  Minimal Group - Maximal Effect? Evaluation and Anthropomorphization of the Humanoid Robot NAO , 2011, ICSR.

[153]  Christian A. Gonzalez,et al.  Seeing Minds in Others – Can Agents with Robotic Appearance Have Human-Like Preferences? , 2016, PloS one.

[154]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[155]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[156]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Trusting Humans and Avatars: A Brain Imaging Study Based on Evolution Theory , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[157]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  How affective information from faces and scenes interacts in the brain. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[158]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain Activity Evoked by the Perception of Human Walking: Controlling for Meaningful Coherent Motion , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[159]  Susanne Quadflieg,et al.  In our own image? Emotional and neural processing differences when observing human–human vs human–robot interactions , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[160]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Brain Response to a Humanoid Robot in Areas Implicated in the Perception of Human Emotional Gestures , 2010, PloS one.

[161]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[162]  E. Wiese,et al.  Beliefs about the Minds of Others Influence How We Process Sensory Information , 2014, PloS one.

[163]  Daniel Houser,et al.  A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[164]  A. Cohen,et al.  Assigning economic value to people results in dehumanization brain response. , 2014 .

[165]  Kai Vogeley,et al.  Why we interact: On the functional role of the striatum in the subjective experience of social interaction , 2014, NeuroImage.

[166]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Goal Representation in Human Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[167]  Sonya S. Kwak,et al.  What makes people empathize with an emotional robot?: The impact of agency and physical embodiment on human empathy for a robot , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[168]  J. Perner,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Fractionating Theory of Mind: a Meta-analysis of Functional Brain Imaging Studies , 2022 .

[169]  James Stanley,et al.  How instructions modify perception: An fMRI study investigating brain areas involved in attributing human agency , 2010, NeuroImage.

[170]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The shaping of social perception by stimulus and knowledge cues to human animacy , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[171]  N. Haslam,et al.  More human than you: attributing humanness to self and others. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[172]  Kendrick Kay,et al.  The Functional Neuroanatomy of Human Face Perception. , 2017, Annual review of vision science.

[173]  Martin A. Giese,et al.  Prejudiced interactions: implicit racial bias reduces predictive simulation during joint action with an out-group avatar , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[174]  Burcu A. Urgen,et al.  Observation and imitation of actions performed by humans, androids, and robots: an EMG study , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[175]  S. Huettel,et al.  A nexus model of the temporal–parietal junction , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[176]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Bottom‐up, not top‐down, modulation of imitation by human and robotic models , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.