Getting interaction theory (IT) together: integrating developmental, phenomenological, enactive, and dynamical approaches to social interaction

We argue that progress in our scientific understanding of the ‘social mind’ is hampered by a number of unfounded assumptions. We single out the widely shared assumption that social behavior depends solely on the capacities of an individual agent. In contrast, both developmental and phenomenological studies suggest that the personal-level capacity for detached ‘social cognition’ (conceived as a process of theorizing about and/or simulating another mind) is a secondary achievement that is dependent on more immediate processes of embodied social interaction. We draw on the enactive approach to cognitive science to further clarify this strong notion of ‘social interaction’ in theoretical terms. In addition, we indicate how this interaction theory (IT) could eventually be formalized with the help of a dynamical systems perspective on the interaction process, especially by making use of evolutionary robotics modeling. We conclude that bringing together the methods and insights of developmental, phenomenological, enactive and dynamical approaches to social interaction can provide a promising framework for future research. Keywords: theory of mind; cognitive science; phenomenology; embodied cognition; dynamical systems theory; enactive approach; social cognition; interaction theory; evolutionary robotics

[1]  Mitchell Herschbach,et al.  On the role of social interaction in social cognition: a mechanistic alternative to enactivism , 2012 .

[2]  John Michael,et al.  Interaction and social cognition: A comment on Auvray et al.’s perceptual crossing paradigm , 2012 .

[3]  Tom Froese,et al.  Imitation by social interaction? Analysis of a minimal agent-based model of the correspondence problem , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  Tom Froese,et al.  Using Human–Computer Interfaces to Investigate ‘Mind-As-It-Could-Be’ from the First-Person Perspective , 2012, Cognitive Computation.

[5]  R. Stout What someone’s behaviour must be like if we are to be aware of their emotions in it , 2012 .

[6]  S. Gallagher In Defense of Phenomenological Approaches to Social Cognition: Interacting with the Critics , 2012 .

[7]  Joel Krueger,et al.  Seeing mind in action , 2012 .

[8]  Charles Lenay,et al.  Minimalist Approach to Perceptual Interactions , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Enactive and Behavioral Abstraction Accounts of Social Understanding in Chimpanzees, Infants, and Adults , 2012 .

[10]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Multi-cue Contingency Detection , 2012, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[11]  D. Zahavi Empathy and Direct Social Perception: A Phenomenological Proposal , 2011 .

[12]  J. Michael Interactionism and Mindreading , 2011 .

[13]  Pierre Jacob,et al.  The Direct-Perception Model of Empathy: a Critique , 2011 .

[14]  Tom Froese,et al.  Re-Viewing from Within: A Commentary on First- and Second-Person Methods in the Science of Consciousness , 2011 .

[15]  G. Csibra,et al.  Seventeen-month-olds appeal to false beliefs to interpret others' referential communication. , 2010, Developmental science.

[16]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo,et al.  Chapter 3 Overcoming Autopoiesis: An Enactive Detour on the Way from Life to Society , 2010 .

[17]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Can social interaction constitute social cognition? , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  S. Pauen,et al.  Early Theory of Mind Competencies: Do Infants Understand Others' Beliefs? , 2010, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[19]  Dan Zahavi,et al.  Beyond Empathy. Phenomenological Approaches to Intersubjectivity , 2010 .

[20]  Marieke Rohde,et al.  Enaction, Embodiment, Evolutionary Robotics - Simulation Models for a Post-Cognitivist Science of Mind , 2010, Atlantis Thinking Machines.

[21]  Tom Froese,et al.  Modelling social interaction as perceptual crossing: an investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process , 2010, Connect. Sci..

[22]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  False-belief understanding in infants , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Shannon Spaulding,et al.  Embodied Cognition and Mindreading , 2010 .

[24]  C. Frith,et al.  Rapid Response Subject Collections , 2022 .

[25]  Tom Froese,et al.  On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency , 2009, Adapt. Behav..

[26]  Tom Froese,et al.  Toward Minimally Social Behavior: Social Psychology Meets Evolutionary Robotics , 2009, ECAL.

[27]  Susan S. Jones,et al.  The development of imitation in infancy , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  Steve Torrance,et al.  Emotion and ethics: An inter-(en)active approach , 2009 .

[29]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm , 2009, Cognition.

[30]  Barbara Webb,et al.  Animals Versus Animats: Or Why Not Model the Real Iguana? , 2009, Adapt. Behav..

[31]  Tom Froese,et al.  Sociality and the life–mind continuity thesis , 2009 .

[32]  Pierre Steiner,et al.  From autonomy to heteronomy (and back): The enaction of social life , 2009 .

[33]  H. D. Jaegher,et al.  Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation , 2009 .

[34]  Peter Carruthers,et al.  How we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  M. Auvray,et al.  Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment , 2009 .

[36]  C. Allen,et al.  How “weak” mindreaders inherited the earth , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Enactive artificial intelligence: Investigating the systemic organization of life and mind , 2009, Artif. Intell..

[38]  T. Froese Hume and the enactive approach to mind , 2009 .

[39]  V. Reddy How Infants Know Minds , 2008 .

[40]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Can an agent’s false belief be corrected by an appropriate communication? Psychological reasoning in 18-month-old infants , 2008, Cognition.

[41]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Associative Learning on a Continuum in Evolved Dynamical Neural Networks , 2008, Adapt. Behav..

[42]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Developing social action capabilities in a humanoid robot using an interaction history architecture , 2008, Humanoids 2008 - 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[43]  G. Currie Some ways to understand people , 2008 .

[44]  Mitchell Herschbach Folk psychological and phenomenological accounts of social perception , 2008 .

[45]  L. Fadiga,et al.  The mirror neuron system: New frontiers , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[46]  M. Rohde,et al.  Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction? Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing , 2008 .

[47]  Tom Froese,et al.  Stability of Coordination Requires Mutuality of Interaction in a Model of Embodied Agents , 2008, SAB.

[48]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  Intersubjectivity in perception , 2008 .

[49]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice , 2008 .

[50]  S. Gallagher Direct perception in the intersubjective context , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[51]  J. Kelso,et al.  Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[52]  A. Chemero,et al.  After the Philosophy of Mind: Replacing Scholasticism with Science* , 2008, Philosophy of Science.

[53]  S. Gallagher,et al.  The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science , 2007 .

[54]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Participatory sense-making , 2007 .

[55]  Hiroyuki Iizuka,et al.  Minimal Agency Detection of Embodied Agents , 2007, ECAL.

[56]  D. Sperber,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Attribution of Beliefs by 13-Month-Old Infants , 2022 .

[57]  G. Csibra,et al.  Action Anticipation Through Attribution of False Belief by 2-Year-Olds , 2007, Psychological science.

[58]  B. Puri,et al.  The human mirror system: A motor resonance theory of mind-reading , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[59]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  A Survey of Artificial Cognitive Systems: Implications for the Autonomous Development of Mental Capabilities in Computational Agents , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[60]  J. Issartel,et al.  Unintended interpersonal co-ordination: “can we march to the beat of our own drum?” , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[61]  A. Clark Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  J. Perner,et al.  Do infants really understand false belief? Response to Leslie , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[63]  Eduardo Izquierdo-Torres,et al.  Is an Embodied System Ever Purely Reactive? , 2005, ECAL.

[64]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs? , 2005, Science.

[65]  J. Perner,et al.  Infants' Insight into the Mind: How Deep? , 2005, Science.

[66]  V. Gallese Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience , 2005 .

[67]  Ori Friedman,et al.  Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’ , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  Vasudevi Reddy,et al.  Participants Don’t Need Theories , 2004 .

[69]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  A unifying view of the basis of social cognition , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[70]  K. Stormark,et al.  Infants’ sensitivity to social contingency: a “double video” study of face-to-face communication between 2- and 4-month-olds and their mothers , 2004 .

[71]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The Dynamics of Active Categorical Perception in an Evolved Model Agent , 2003, Adapt. Behav..

[72]  Hiroyuki Iizuka,et al.  Adaptability and Diversity in Simulated Turn-taking Behavior , 2003, Artificial Life.

[73]  D. Povinelli,et al.  Chimpanzee minds: suspiciously human? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[74]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[75]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  Redrawing the Map and Resetting the Time: Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences , 2003 .

[76]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  From embodied to socially embedded agents – Implications for interaction-aware robots , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[77]  R. Beer Dynamical approaches to cognitive science , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[78]  F. Varela,et al.  Beyond the gap: An introduction to naturalizing phenomenology , 1999 .

[79]  F. Varela,et al.  CHAPTER NINE The Specious Present: A Neurophenomenology of Time Consciousness , 2000, Naturalizing Phenomenology.

[80]  Aude Billard,et al.  Studying robot social cognition within a developmental psychology framework , 1999, 1999 Third European Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots (Eurobot'99). Proceedings (Cat. No.99EX355).

[81]  J. Nadel,et al.  Expectancies for social contingency in 2‐month‐olds , 1999 .

[82]  T. Gelder,et al.  The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[83]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Explaining Facial Imitation: A Theoretical Model. , 1997, Early development & parenting.

[84]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  I Could Be You: the Phenomenological Dimension of Social Understanding , 1997, Cybern. Syst..

[85]  S. Baron-Cohen Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind , 1997 .

[86]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The earliest sense of self and others: Merleau-Ponty and recent developmental studies. , 1996, Philosophical psychology.

[87]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[88]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Theories of Theories of Mind , 1996 .

[89]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Getting to know each other - Artificial social intelligence for autonomous robots , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[90]  T. Gelder,et al.  Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition , 1995 .

[91]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Trying to imitate-a step towards releasing robots from social isolation , 1994, Proceedings of PerAc '94. From Perception to Action.

[92]  E. Rosch,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 1993 .

[93]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Development as a dynamic system , 1992, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[94]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology , 1984 .

[95]  T. Brazelton,et al.  The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. , 1978, Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry.

[96]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates , 1977, Science.

[97]  Maurice Merleau-Ponty,et al.  Phenomenology of perception , 2016 .

[98]  Michael Wheeler,et al.  Minds, Things and Materiality , 2012 .

[99]  Tom Froese,et al.  An inter-enactive approach to agency: participatory sense-making, dynamics, and sociality , 2011 .

[100]  S. Gallagher Interpretations of embodied cognition , 2011 .

[101]  M. Rohde,et al.  Horizons for the Enactive Mind: Values, Social Interaction, and Play , 2010 .

[102]  Alva Noë,et al.  Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness , 2009 .

[103]  R. Adolphs,et al.  The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[104]  T. Ziemke,et al.  Interacting Socially through Embodied Action , 2008 .

[105]  A. Clark Supersizing the Mind , 2008 .

[106]  J. Lindblom Minding the Body: Interacting socially through embodied action , 2007 .

[107]  T. Ikegami,et al.  Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals: Simulated turn-taking and development of styles of motion , 2007 .

[108]  E. Hutchins Enaction, imagination, and insight , 2007 .

[109]  Alva Noë,et al.  Action in Perception , 2006, Representation and Mind.

[110]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Evolutionary Robotics: A New Scientific Tool for Studying Cognition , 2005, Artificial Life.

[111]  S Hurley,et al.  Perspectives on Imitation , 2004 .

[112]  A. Goldman Imitation, Mind Reading, and Simulation. , 2005 .

[113]  S. Gallagher How the body shapes the mind , 2005 .

[114]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: background, motivation and challenges , 2004 .

[115]  J. Heal Replication and Functionalism , 2003 .

[116]  W. Prinz,et al.  The imitative mind : development, evolution, and brain bases , 2002 .

[117]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[118]  G. Gergely,et al.  The obscure object of desire: 'nearly, but clearly not, like me': contingency preference in normal children versus children with autism. , 2001, Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic.

[119]  Evan Thompson,et al.  Empathy and consciousness. , 2001 .

[120]  Ezequiel A. Di Paolo,et al.  Behavioral Coordination, Structural Congruence and Entrainment in a Simulation of Acoustically Coupled Agents , 2000, Adapt. Behav..

[121]  T. Gelder Wooden iron? Husserlian phenomenology meets cognitive science , 1999 .

[122]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  MUTUAL ENLIGHTENMENT: RECENT PHENOMENOLOGY IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE , 1997 .

[123]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Words, thoughts, and theories , 1997 .

[124]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Toward the Evolution of Dynamical Neural Networks for Minimally Cognitive Behavior , 1996 .

[125]  F. Varela,et al.  NEUROPHENOMENOLOGY A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem , 1996 .

[126]  A. Opstal Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[127]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  A Dynamical Systems Perspective on Agent-Environment Interaction , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[128]  S. Baron-Cohen Precursors to a theory of mind: Understanding attention in others. , 1991 .

[129]  A. Kendon Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters , 1990 .

[130]  K. Kaye The mental and social life of babies : how parents create persons , 1982 .

[131]  C. Trevarthen Communication and cooperation in early infancy: a description of primary intersubjectivity , 1979 .