Experimental assessment of the quality of ergonomic indicators for collaborative robotics computed using a digital human model

The growing number of musculoskeletal disorders in industry could be addressed by the use of collaborative robots, which allow the joint manipulation of objects by both a robot and a person. Designing these robots requires to assess the ergonomic benefit they offer. Current methods use a posteriori assessment, i.e. observation of the worker, and need a physical mock-up of the robot. Moreover, they exclude dynamic phenomena because their measurements require heavy instrumentation. It has been proposed to use a digital human model, allowing to assess the ergonomic performance of a collaborative robot during the design process. This paper presents preliminary results on three ergonomic indicators formulated to meet the requirements of collaborative robotics. They evaluate respectively the position of the worker, his physical effort and the energy spent during the task. The same manual task is performed by seven human subjects under different time, load and geometric constraints. Each performance is recorded and replayed with a digital manikin in a dynamic simulation framework, in order to calculate the values of the indicators. All three indicators are strongly affected by the geometric parameters in a way that is consistent with ergonomic guidelines. Besides, a linear correlation between the values of the indicators and the penibility perceived by the subjects is observed. Moreover, the results show that the relevance of an indicator is strongly affected by the task features, especially its duration. Future work will be directed towards automatic selection of relevant indicators for a given task.

[1]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Michael Damsgaard,et al.  Analysis of musculoskeletal systems in the AnyBody Modeling System , 2006, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[3]  S H Snook,et al.  The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[4]  C. Cashman [European agency for safety and health at work]. , 2013, Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales.

[5]  Don B. Chaffin,et al.  Working Postures and Movements: Tools for Evaluation and Engineering , 2005 .

[6]  Vincent Padois,et al.  Synthesis of complex humanoid whole-body behavior: A focus on sequencing and tasks transitions , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  P. Buckle,et al.  Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[8]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Intelligent assist devices in industrial applications: a review , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[9]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Multi-objective optimisation method for posture prediction and analysis with consideration of fatigue effect and its application case , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[10]  Scott L. Delp,et al.  A Model of the Upper Extremity for Simulating Musculoskeletal Surgery and Analyzing Neuromuscular Control , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Human Motion Reconstruction and Synthesis of Human Skills , 2010 .

[12]  D. Chaffin,et al.  Prediction of metabolic rates for manual materials handling jobs. , 1978, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[13]  Paul L Gribble,et al.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G. David Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. , 2005, Occupational medicine.

[15]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.