Optical wireless localization

In this paper, we explore the possibility of using directionality of free-space-optical (a.k.a. optical wireless) communications for solving the 3-D localization problem in ad-hoc networking environments. Range-based localization methods either require a higher node density (i.e., at least three other localized neighbors must exist) than required for assuring connectedness or a high-accuracy power-intensive ranging device such as a sonar or laser range finder which exceeds the form factor and power capabilities of a typical ad-hoc node. Our approach exploits the readily available directionality information provided by a physical layer using optical wireless and uses a limited number of GPS-enabled nodes, requiring a very low node density (2-connectedness, independent of the dimension of space) and no ranging technique. We investigate the extent and accuracy of localization with respect to varying node designs (e.g., increased number of transceivers with better directionality) and density of GPS-enabled and ordinary nodes as well as messaging overhead per re-localization. Although denser deployments are desirable for higher accuracy, our method still works well with sparse networks with little message overhead and small number of anchor nodes (as little as 2). We also present a proof-of-concept prototype of our FSO-based localization techniques and show the validity of our approach even with three transceivers per node.

[1]  Murat Yuksel,et al.  Free-space-optical mobile ad hoc networks: Auto-configurable building blocks , 2009, Wirel. Networks.

[2]  Brad Karp,et al.  GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[3]  Murat Yuksel,et al.  Prototyping Multi-Transceiver Free-Space Optical Communication Structures , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[4]  Murat Yuksel,et al.  A Relative Ad hoc Localization Scheme using Optical Wireless , 2007, 2007 2nd International Conference on Communication Systems Software and Middleware.

[5]  Murat Yuksel,et al.  Packet-based simulation for optical wireless communication , 2010, 2010 17th IEEE Workshop on Local & Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN).

[6]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[7]  Murat Yuksel,et al.  3-D Optical wireless localization , 2010, 2010 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[8]  F. Raab,et al.  Magnetic Position and Orientation Tracking System , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[9]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Ad-hoc localization using ranging and sectoring , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[10]  Murat Yuksel,et al.  Throughput characteristics of free-space-optical mobile ad hoc networks , 2010, MSWIM '10.

[11]  B. R. Badrinath,et al.  Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AOA , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[12]  David E. Culler,et al.  Calibration as parameter estimation in sensor networks , 2002, WSNA '02.

[13]  J. Krumm,et al.  Multi-camera multi-person tracking for EasyLiving , 2000, Proceedings Third IEEE International Workshop on Visual Surveillance.

[14]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  Design and Calibration of the SpotON Ad-Hoc Location Sensing System , 2001 .

[15]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Robust range estimation using acoustic and multimodal sensing , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[16]  M. Bilgi,et al.  Multi-element Free-Space-Optical spherical structures with intermittent connectivity patterns , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM Workshops 2008.