Inventing to Prepare for Future Learning: The Hidden Efficiency of Encouraging Original Student Production in Statistics Instruction

Activities that promote student invention can appear inefficient, because students do not generate canonical solutions, and therefore the students may perform badly on standard assessments. Two studies on teaching descriptive statistics to 9th-grade students examined whether invention activities may prepare students to learn. Study 1 found that invention activities, when coupled with subsequent learning resources like lectures, led to strong gains in procedural skills, insight into formulas, and abilities to evaluate data from an argument. Additionally, an embedded assessment experiment crossed the factors of instructional method by type of transfer test, with 1 test including resources for learning and 1 not. A "tell-and-practice" instructional condition led to the same transfer results as an invention condition when there was no learning resource, but the invention condition did better than the tell-and-practice condition when there was a learning resource. This demonstrates the value of invention activities for future learning from resources, and the value of assessments that include opportunities to learn during a test. In Study 2, classroom teachers implemented the instruction and replicated the results. The studies demonstrate that intuitively compelling student-centered activities can be both pedagogically tractable and effective at preparing students to learn.

[1]  Jo Boaler,et al.  Experiencing School Mathematics: Teaching Styles, Sex, and Setting , 1997 .

[2]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The transition form theory to therapy: Test of two instructional methods , 1993 .

[3]  Joel B. Greenhouse,et al.  Applying Cognitive Theory to Statistics Instruction , 2000 .

[4]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Skill Acquisition and the LISP Tutor , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  James G. Greeno,et al.  Response: On Claims That Answer the Wrong Questions , 1997 .

[6]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  Rightstart: Providing the central conceptual prerequisites for first formal learning of arithmetic to students at risk for school failure. , 1994 .

[7]  Joanne Lobato,et al.  How Design Experiments Can Inform a Rethinking of Transfer andViceVersa , 2003 .

[8]  Robert D. Sherwood,et al.  Manipulating and measuring student engagement in computer-based instruction , 2003 .

[9]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Preschool children can learn to transfer: Learning to learn and learning from example , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Tinkering toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform. , 1996 .

[11]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implica-tions , 1999 .

[12]  E. C. Richard,et al.  The collected works , 1954 .

[13]  Andra A. DiSessa Inventing Graphing: Meta­ Representational Expertise in Children , 1991 .

[14]  Aileen B. Sedman,et al.  A longitudinal study , 1987 .

[15]  J.L. Schmalzel,et al.  Data handling , 1991, IEEE Spectrum.

[16]  E. Gibson A systematic application of the concepts of generalization and differentiation to verbal learning , 1940 .

[17]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching , 2003 .

[18]  Jean-Baptiste Lully,et al.  The collected works , 1996 .

[19]  Susan Jo Russell,et al.  Children's Concepts of Average and Representativeness. , 1995 .

[20]  C. Konold,et al.  Informal Conceptions of Probability , 1989 .

[21]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[22]  J. Piaget,et al.  The equilibration of cognitive structures : the central problem of intellectual development , 1985 .

[23]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Physically Distributed Learning: Adapting and Reinterpreting Physical Environments in the Development of Fraction Concepts , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  W. D. Gray,et al.  Transfer of Cognitive Skills , 1987 .

[25]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes , 2001, CHI.

[26]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Learning About Statistical Covariation , 2003 .

[27]  Sam Wineburg,et al.  Reading Abraham Lincoln: An Expert/Expert Study in the Interpretation of Historical Texts , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Yaacov Rand,et al.  The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments and techniques , 1981 .

[29]  J. Greeno On Claims That Answer the Wrong Questions , 1997 .

[30]  A. Astin,et al.  Where's the Learning in Service-Learning? , 1999 .

[31]  Luis C. Moll Writing As Communication: Creating Strategic Learning Environments for Students , 1986 .

[32]  Ela Hunt,et al.  A cognitive approach to the teaching of physics , 1994 .

[33]  L M Reder,et al.  The role of elaborations in learning a skill from an instructional text , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Ewa Czaplewska,et al.  PRESCHOOL CHILDREN , 2011 .

[35]  Leslie J. Briggs,et al.  Principles of Instructional Design , 1974 .

[36]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[37]  D. S. Moore,et al.  Mathematics, statistics, and teaching , 1997 .

[38]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  How Mathematics Propels the Development of Physical Knowledge , 2005 .

[39]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[40]  J. Gibson,et al.  Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment? , 1955, Psychological review.

[41]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Grounding Metaphors and Inscriptional Resonance: Children's Emerging Understanding of Mathematical Similarity , 2002 .

[42]  G. Hatano,et al.  TWO COURSES OF EXPERTISE , 1984 .

[43]  David Green,et al.  Data Handling , 1994 .

[44]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[45]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development , 1997 .

[46]  John D. Bransford,et al.  New approaches to instruction: because wisdom can't be told , 1989 .

[47]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children's multidigit addition and subtraction , 1998 .

[48]  James Britton,et al.  Language and Learning , 1970 .

[49]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[50]  H. Gardner,et al.  Art, Mind, And Brain: A Cognitive Approach To Creativity , 1984 .

[51]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning , 1998 .

[52]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  A time for telling , 1998 .

[53]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[54]  L. Schauble,et al.  Inventing Data Structures for Representational Purposes: Elementary Grade Students' Classification Models , 2000 .

[55]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Transfer of Cognitive Skill , 1989 .

[56]  John J. Clement,et al.  Using Bridging Analogies and Anchoring Institutions to Seal with Students' Preconceptions in Physics , 1993 .

[57]  Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini,et al.  Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky , 1980 .

[58]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Individual and Collective Mathematical Development: The Case of Statistical Data Analysis. , 1999 .

[59]  Ming Ming Chiu,et al.  Learning to Graph Linear Functions: A Case Study of Conceptual Change , 2001 .

[60]  R. Glaser,et al.  Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment , 2001 .

[61]  Jill Anthony,et al.  Where's the Learning in Service-Learning? , 2001 .

[62]  Christopher H. Morrell,et al.  Lines in Random Effects Plots from the Linear Mixed-Effects Model , 2000 .

[63]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[64]  Maria Valeras,et al.  Children's Developing Understanding of Place Value: Semiotic Aspects , 1997 .

[65]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[66]  S. Hodge,et al.  Statistics and Probability , 1972 .

[67]  Bruce D. Burns,et al.  The Impact of Goal Specificity on Strategy Use and the Acquisition of Problem Structure , 1996, Cogn. Sci..