Dependence of Visual Cell Properties on Intracortical Synapses Among Hypercolumns: Analysis by a Computer Model

The role of intracortical synapses in affecting the property of visual cells is investigated by means of an original mathematical model of cortical circuitry in V1. The model represents a compromise between computational simplicity and physiological reliability. The model incorporates four different inputs into a cortical cell: thalamic input from the lateral geniculate nucleus, according to an even Gabor function; short-range inhibition confined within the hypercolumn; a long-range excitation, which emphasizes the properties of the input; and a long-range inhibition. In the model we assume that all cells receive a similar thalamic input, which differs simply according to its position in the retina and orientation preference.Simulations were performed, with different parameter values, to assess the main characteristics of cell response (i.e., the width and locations of subregions in the receptive field (RF), orientation tuning curve, and response to drifting and counterphase gratings) as a function of the strength and extension of intracortical excitatory synapses. Results suggest that, if intracortical excitation is confined within the hypercolumn, the cells exhibit the same properties as simple cells, both with regards to the width and shape of the RF, orientation tuning curve, and response to drifting and counterphase gratings. By contrast, if excitatory synapses extend beyond the hypercolumn with sufficient strength, the cells exhibit the typical characteristics of complex cells. A progressive shift from complex to simple cells can be realized with a monotonic variation in parameters. Simulations are also performed with a hierarchical model, to suggest possible experiments able to discriminate the present recurrent mechanism from the classical hierarchical one.Results support the assumptions of previous simpler models (Chance et al., 1999) and may help to understand and assess the role of intracortical synapses in rigorous quantitative terms.

[1]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  The Role of Constraints in Hebbian Learning , 1994, Neural Computation.

[2]  U. Eysel,et al.  Combined physiological-anatomical approaches to study lateral inhibition , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  D. Ferster,et al.  An intracellular analysis of geniculo‐cortical connectivity in area 17 of the cat. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning in Cat Visual Cortex: Thalamocortical Input Tuning and Correlation-Based Intracortical Connectivity , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  D. Mackay,et al.  Differential responsiveness of simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex to visual texture , 1977, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  J. Alonso,et al.  Complex Receptive Fields in Primary Visual Cortex , 2003, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[8]  D. Ferster,et al.  Neural mechanisms of orientation selectivity in the visual cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Theory of orientation tuning in visual cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J. Alonso,et al.  Functional connectivity between simple cells and complex cells in cat striate cortex , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  S. Nelson,et al.  An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  On the distinctness of simple and complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  Form, function and intracortical projections of spiny neurones in the striate visual cortex of the cat. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  K. Tanaka.  Cross-correlation analysis of geniculostriate neuronal relationships in cats. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Mauro Ursino,et al.  Comparison of different models of orientation selectivity based on distinct intracortical inhibition rules , 2004, Vision Research.

[16]  P. Heggelund,et al.  Response variability and orientation discrimination of single cells in striate cortex of cat , 1978, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Separate processing dynamics for texture elements, boundaries and surfaces in primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  VEIJO VIRSU,et al.  Cortical Magnification, Scale Invariance and Visual Ecology , 1996, Vision Research.

[21]  C. Gilbert.  Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics , 1992, Neuron.

[22]  D. Ringach,et al.  On the classification of simple and complex cells , 2002, Vision Research.

[23]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Spatial distribution of contextual interactions in primary visual cortex and in visual perception. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Responses to moving slits by single units in cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  A. Treves.  Mean-field analysis of neuronal spike dynamics , 1993 .

[26]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Circuits for Local and Global Signal Integration in Primary Visual Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  J. Alonso,et al.  Construction of Complex Receptive Fields in Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 2001, Neuron.

[29]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  The contribution of spike threshold to the dichotomy of cortical simple and complex cells , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  J. Movshon,et al.  Length summation in simple cells of cat striate cortex , 1984, Vision Research.

[32]  J. Malpeli,et al.  Cat area 17. I. Pattern of thalamic control of cortical layers. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  J. Bullier,et al.  Reaching beyond the classical receptive field of V1 neurons: horizontal or feedback axons? , 2003, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[34]  R. Shapley,et al.  Orientation Selectivity in Macaque V1: Diversity and Laminar Dependence , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Complex cells as cortically amplified simple cells , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  A. B. Bonds,et al.  Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation , 1991, Vision Research.

[37]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Organization of suppression in receptive fields of neurons in cat visual cortex. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: Parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys , 1995, Neuron.

[40]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Contextual Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  K. Miller,et al.  Synaptic Economics: Competition and Cooperation in Synaptic Plasticity , 1996, Neuron.

[42]  P. Somogyi,et al.  Quantitative distribution of GABA-immunoreactive neurons in the visual cortex (area 17) of the cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  U. Eysel,et al.  Orientation-specific relationship between populations of excitatory and inhibitory lateral connections in the visual cortex of the cat. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Y. Dudai.  Consolidation: Fragility on the Road to the Engram , 1996, Neuron.

[45]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  P. Heggelund.  Receptive field organization of complex cells in cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  R. Shapley,et al.  An egalitarian network model for the emergence of simple and complex cells in visual cortex , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[49]  J. Malpeli.  Activity of cells in area 17 of the cat in absence of input from layer a of lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Christian Wehrhahn,et al.  Neuronal responses from beyond the classic receptive field in V1 of alert monkeys , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[52]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.