The co-evolution of technological promises, modelling, policies and climate change targets

The nature and framing of climate targets in international politics has changed substantially since their early expressions in the 1980s. Here, we describe their evolution in five phases—from ‘climate stabilization’ to specific ‘temperature outcomes’—co-evolving with wider climate politics and policy, modelling methods and scenarios, and technological promises (from nuclear power to carbon removal). We argue that this co-evolution has enabled policy prevarication, leaving mitigation poorly delivered, yet the technological promises often remain buried in the models used to inform policy. We conclude with a call to recognise and break this pattern to unleash more effective and just climate policy. This Perspective maps the history of climate targets and shows how the international goal of avoiding dangerous climate change has been reinterpreted in the light of new modelling methods and technological promises, ultimately enabling policy prevarication and limiting mitigation.

[1]  A. Lovins.  How big is the energy efficiency resource? , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[2]  S. Beck,et al.  The IPCC and the new map of science and politics , 2018, WIREs Climate Change.

[3]  Jean-Pascal van Ypersele de Strihou,et al.  Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies , 2008 .

[4]  V. Masson‐Delmotte,et al.  Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? , 2008, 0804.1126.

[5]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  The evolution of the IPCC's emissions scenarios , 2009 .

[6]  M. Weisz.  Carbon Democracy Political Power In The Age Of Oil , 2016 .

[7]  H. Muri.  The role of large—scale BECCS in the pursuit of the 1.5°C target: an Earth system model perspective , 2018 .

[8]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Harmonization vs. fragmentation: overview of climate policy scenarios in EMF27 , 2014, Climatic Change.

[9]  Felix Creutzig,et al.  Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis , 2018 .

[10]  David Tyfield,et al.  The political economy of technical fixes:the (mis)alignment of clean fossil and political regimes , 2017 .

[11]  L. Eberhardt.  Restoring the Quality of Our Environment , 1967 .

[12]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[13]  Claude A. Garcia,et al.  The global tree restoration potential , 2019, Science.

[14]  M. Hulme,et al.  Why setting a climate deadline is dangerous , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[15]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Betting on negative emissions , 2014 .

[16]  Jessica Jewell,et al.  Debating the bedrock of climate-change mitigation scenarios , 2019, Nature.

[17]  Paul Upham,et al.  The Public and CCS: The importance of communication and participation in the context of local realities , 2011 .

[18]  Benjamin Evar,et al.  The Social Dynamics of Carbon Capture and Storage , 2012 .

[19]  Constanze Frank-Oster.  A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change , 2013 .

[20]  Jack Stilgoe,et al.  Experiment Earth: Responsible Innovation In Geoengineering , 2015 .

[21]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  What is wrong with energy efficiency? , 2018 .

[22]  V. Masson‐Delmotte,et al.  Target atmospheric CO2: Supporting material , 2008, 0804.1135.

[23]  M. Tavoni,et al.  An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways , 2019, Nature Communications.

[24]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[25]  S. Beck,et al.  The politics of anticipation: the IPCC and the negative emissions technologies experience , 2018, Global Sustainability.

[26]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne , 2009, Nature.

[27]  K. Emanuel,et al.  Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[28]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage From Fossil Fuels and Biomass – Costs and Potential Role in Stabilizing the Atmosphere , 2006 .

[29]  L. Clarke,et al.  A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal , 2019, Nature.

[30]  Three views of two degrees , 2010 .

[31]  S. Gardiner.  A Perfect Moral Storm , 2011 .

[32]  Nils Markusson,et al.  Towards a cultural political economy of mitigation deterrence by negative emissions technologies (NETs) , 2018, Global Sustainability.