Use of industrial robots for hardware-in-the-loop simulation of satellite rendezvous and docking

Abstract One of the most challenging and risky operations for spacecraft is to perform rendezvous and docking autonomously in space. To ensure a safe and reliable operation, such a mission must be carefully designed and thoroughly verified before a real space mission can be launched. This paper describes the control strategy for achieving high fidelity contact dynamics simulation of a new, robotics-based, hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) rendezvous and docking simulation facility that uses two industrial robots to physically simulate the 6-DOF dynamic maneuvering of two docking satellites. The facility is capable of physically simulating the final approaching within a 25-meter range and the entire docking/capturing process for a satellite on-orbit servicing mission. The key difficulties of using industrial robots for high-fidelity HIL contact dynamics simulation were found and different solution techniques were investigated in the presented project. An admittance control method was proposed to achieve the goal of making the robots in the HIL simulation process match the impedance of the two docking satellites. Simulation study showed the effectiveness and performance of the proposed solution method.

[1]  Toralf Boge,et al.  Flight Dynamics Challenges of the German On-Orbit Servicing Mission DEOS , 2009 .

[2]  Atsushi Konno,et al.  Hybrid simulation of a dual-arm space robot colliding with a floating object , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Yangsheng Xu,et al.  Autonomous rendezvous and robotic capturing of non-cooperative target in space , 2009, Robotica.

[4]  Yangsheng Xu,et al.  A Ground Experiment System of Free-floating Robot For Capturing Space Target , 2007, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[5]  Steven Dubowsky,et al.  On the dynamic singularities in the control of free-floating space manipulators , 1989 .

[6]  George Vukovich,et al.  Satellite simulator with a hydraulic manipulator , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[7]  S. Dubowsky,et al.  Dynamic Singularities in Free-floating Space Manipulators , 1993 .

[8]  Farhad Aghili,et al.  Task verification facility for the Canadian special purpose dextrous manipulator , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[9]  Ou Ma,et al.  On the Validation of SPDM Task Verification Facility , 2004 .

[10]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Putting energy back in control , 2001 .

[11]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  Adaptive computed torque control for rigid link manipulators , 1986, 1986 25th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[12]  Bernd Schäfer,et al.  LIMITATIONS OF HARDWARE-IN-THE-LOOP SIMULATIONS OF SPACE ROBOTICS DYNAMICS USING INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS , 1999 .

[13]  Heike Benninghoff,et al.  A Flexible Image Processing Framework for Vision-based Navigation Using Monocular Image Sensors , 2011 .

[14]  Heike Benninghoff,et al.  Hardware-in-the-loop Rendezvous Simulation using a Vision Based Sensor , 2011 .

[15]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[16]  Ou Ma,et al.  MDSF - A generic development and simulation facility for flexible, complex robotic systems , 1997, Robotica.

[17]  Jorge Angeles,et al.  Fundamentals of Robotic Mechanical Systems: Theory, Methods, and Algorithms , 1995 .

[18]  W. Rulka,et al.  Space Robotics Dynamics Simulation Performance in Real-Time Environments , 1999 .

[19]  Richard T. Howard,et al.  Automated rendezvous and capture system development and simulation for NASA , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[20]  Darrell K. Root,et al.  Space Robotics: Dynamics and Control , 1996 .

[21]  Robert Bell,et al.  HARDWARE-IN-THE LOOP TESTS OF AN AUTONOMOUS GN&C SYSTEM FOR ON-ORBIT SERVICING * , 2003 .

[22]  Kazuya Yoshida,et al.  Dynamics, control and impedance matching for robotic capture of a non-cooperative satellite , 2004, Adv. Robotics.

[23]  Jorge Angeles,et al.  Fundamentals of Robotic Mechanical Systems , 2008 .

[24]  Y. Umetani,et al.  Continuous Path Control of Space Manipulators Mounted on OMV , 1987 .

[25]  K. Alder,et al.  Role of estimation in real-time contact dynamics enhancement of space station engineering facility , 1996, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[26]  Ioannis M. Rekleitis,et al.  Autonomous capture of a tumbling satellite , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[27]  Wigbert Fehse,et al.  Automated Rendezvous and Docking of Spacecraft , 2003 .

[28]  W. S. Newman,et al.  Stability and Performance Limits of Interaction Controllers , 1992 .

[29]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.