For humans navigating without vision, navigation depends upon the layout of mechanically contacted ground surfaces

Navigation can be haptically guided. In specific, tissue deformations arising from both limb motions during locomotion (i.e., gait patterns) and mechanical interactions between the limbs and the environment can convey information, detected by the haptic perceptual system, about how the body is moving relative to the environment. Here, we test hypotheses concerning the properties of mechanically contacted environments relevant to navigation of this kind. We studied blindfolded participants implicitly learning to perceive their location within environments that were physically encountered via walking on, stepping on, and probing ground surfaces with a cane. Environments were straight-line paths with elevated sections where the path either narrowed or remained the same width. We formed hypotheses concerning how these two environments would affect spatial updating and reorientation processes. In the constant pathwidth environment, homing task accuracy was higher and a manipulation of the elevated surface, to be either unchanged or (unbeknown to participants) shortened, biased the performance. This was consistent with our hypothesis of a metric recalibration scaled to elevated surface extent. In the narrowing pathwidth environment, elevated surface shortening did not bias performance. This supported our hypothesis of positional recalibration resulting from contact with the leading edge of the elevated surface. We discuss why certain environmental properties, such as path-narrowing, have significance for how one becomes implicitly oriented the surrounding environment.

[1]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  The Role of the Otoliths in Perception of the Vertical and in Path Integration , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Katherine A. Gaskin,et al.  Incidental encoding of enclosure geometry does not require visual input: evidence from blindfolded adults , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[3]  M V Srinivasan,et al.  Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the "odometer". , 2000, Science.

[4]  Morgan D. Barense,et al.  Boundaries Shape Cognitive Representations of Spaces and Events , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[6]  M. Schwartz Haptic perception of the distance walked when blindfolded. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Biological compasses and the coordinate frame of landmark memories in honeybees , 1994, Nature.

[8]  Gabriel A Radvansky,et al.  Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Event structure or updating disruption? , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Caswell Barry,et al.  Grid cell symmetry is shaped by environmental geometry , 2015, Nature.

[10]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Sources of Flexibility in Human Cognition: Dual-Task Studies of Space and Language , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Hugo J. Spiers,et al.  Place Field Repetition and Purely Local Remapping in a Multicompartment Environment , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Horst Mittelstaedt Triple-loop model of path control by head direction and place cells , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  Ken Cheng,et al.  25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[14]  Neil Burgess,et al.  The role of spatial boundaries in shaping long-term event representations , 2016, Cognition.

[15]  M T Turvey,et al.  Obtaining information by dynamic (effortful) touching , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Friedrich G. Barth,et al.  Idiothetic orientation of a wandering spider: Compensation of detours and estimates of goal distance , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  Steven J. Harrison,et al.  Human Odometry with a Two-Legged Hopping Gait: A Test of the Gait Symmetry Theory , 2020 .

[18]  William H Warren,et al.  How You Get There From Here , 2015, Psychological science.

[19]  W E Skaggs,et al.  Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: the hippocampus as a path integration system. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[20]  Alinda Friedman,et al.  Learning fine-grained and category information in navigable real-world space , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[21]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Experience-dependent rescaling of entorhinal grids , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Dissociating position and heading estimations: Rotated visual orientation cues perceived after walking reset headings but not positions , 2014, Cognition.

[23]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Children's use of geometry for reorientation. , 2008, Developmental science.

[24]  A Berthoz,et al.  Spatial memory and path integration studied by self-driven passive linear displacement. I. Basic properties. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Alexandra D. Twyman,et al.  Geometry three ways: an fMRI investigation of geometric information processing during reorientation. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  Seeing beyond the Target: Environmental Context Affects Distance Perception , 2007, Perception.

[27]  T. Bhatt,et al.  Effect of type of cognitive task and walking speed on cognitive-motor interference during dual-task walking , 2014, Neuroscience.

[28]  T. Gärling,et al.  Acquisition of locational information about reference points during locomotion with and without a concurrent task: effects of number of reference points. , 1981, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[29]  Lea Fleischer,et al.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 2016 .

[30]  A B Schultz,et al.  Stepping over obstacles: dividing attention impairs performance of old more than young adults. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[31]  Andrew P. Duchon,et al.  Humans do not switch between path knowledge and landmarks when learning a new environment , 2007, Psychological research.

[32]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  Path integration and the neural basis of the 'cognitive map' , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  E. Spelke,et al.  Children's use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space , 2001, Cognition.

[34]  M. Moser,et al.  Representation of Geometric Borders in the Entorhinal Cortex , 2008, Science.

[35]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[36]  Emily Fox,et al.  Interactions between cognitive tasks and gait after stroke: a dual task study. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[37]  Katherine A. Gaskin,et al.  More than a feeling: incidental learning of array geometry by blindfolded adult humans revealed through touch , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[38]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  Human Path Integration by Optic Flow , 2004, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[39]  B. Webb,et al.  Neural mechanisms of insect navigation. , 2016, Current opinion in insect science.

[40]  Somayeh Danafar,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of a Biological Odometry , 2012, CogSci.

[41]  Dori Derdikman,et al.  Space,Time and Memory in the Hippocampal Formation , 2014, Springer Vienna.

[42]  A. Kamil,et al.  Geometric rule learning by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[43]  Harry Heft,et al.  The Ecological Approach to Navigation: A Gibsonian Perspective , 1996 .

[44]  Sharon R. Doerkson,et al.  Use of Landmark Configuration in Pigeons and Humans : II . Generality Across Search Tasks , 2001 .

[45]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Piloting Systems Reset Path Integration Systems During Position Estimation , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  T. Collett,et al.  Animal Navigation: Path Integration, Visual Landmarks and Cognitive Maps , 2004, Current Biology.

[47]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  Idiothetic navigation in humans: estimation of path length , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  Jonathan R. Whitlock,et al.  Fragmentation of grid cell maps in a multicompartment environment , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[50]  Nizar Ouarti Lppa,et al.  MULTIMODAL FUSION IN SELF-MOTION PERCEPTION USING WAVELETS AND QUATERNIONS , 2008 .

[51]  Kay Thurley,et al.  Estimation of self-motion duration and distance in rodents , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[52]  Roger D. Santer,et al.  Tactile learning by a whip spider, Phrynus marginemaculatus C.L. Koch (Arachnida, Amblypygi) , 2009, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[53]  E. Moser,et al.  A manifold of spatial maps in the brain , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Sharin E. Garden,et al.  Visuo-spatial working memory in navigation , 2002 .

[55]  David H. Uttal,et al.  One Hidden Object, Two Spatial Codes: Young Children's Use of Relational and Vector Coding , 2006 .

[56]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Computations on metric maps in mammals: getting oriented and choosing a multi-destination route. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[57]  Roland Maurer,et al.  Resetting the path integrator: a basic condition for route-based navigation , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[58]  C. Molstad Choosing and Coping with Boring Work , 1986, Work Place Sabotage.

[59]  Marcia L Spetch,et al.  Reorientation in a two-dimensional environment: II. Do pigeons (Columba livia) encode the featural and geometric properties of a two-dimensional schematic of a room? , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[60]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Reorienting When Cues Conflict , 2008, Psychological science.

[61]  Steven J. Harrison,et al.  Human odometer is gait-symmetry specific , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  K M Gothard,et al.  Dynamics of Mismatch Correction in the Hippocampal Ensemble Code for Space: Interaction between Path Integration and Environmental Cues , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Michael J. Tarr,et al.  Humans Follow Landmarks Over Path Integration , 2004 .

[64]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Two systems of spatial representation underlying navigation , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[65]  Zaneta Navratilova,et al.  Models of Path Integration in the Hippocampal Complex , 2014 .

[66]  Catherine Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Generalization in place learning and geometry knowledge in rats. , 2004, Learning & memory.

[67]  Steven J. Harrison,et al.  Place learning by mechanical contact , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[68]  Ariane S Etienne,et al.  Path integration in mammals , 2004, Hippocampus.

[69]  Daniele Nardi,et al.  Pigeon (Columba livia) encoding of a goal location: the relative importance of shape geometry and slope information. , 2009, Journal of comparative psychology.

[70]  Gabriel A Radvansky,et al.  Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Situation models and experienced space , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[71]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[72]  Edvard I. Moser,et al.  Speed cells in the medial entorhinal cortex , 2015, Nature.

[73]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  Visual and tactile learning of ground structures in desert ants , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[74]  Cynthia D. Fisherl Boredom at Work: A Neglected Concept , 1993 .

[75]  Nora S Newcombe,et al.  Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. , 2008, Developmental science.