The tactile integration of local motion cues is analogous to its visual counterpart

The visual and somatosensory systems have been shown to process spatial information similarly. Here we investigate tactile motion processing using stimuli whose perceptual properties have been well established in vision research, namely superimposed gratings (plaids), barber poles, and bar fields. In both modalities, information about stimulus motion (speed and direction) conveyed by neurons at low levels of sensory processing is ambiguous, a conundrum known as the aperture problem. Our results suggest that the tactile perception of motion, analogous to its visual counterpart, operates in multiple stages: first, the perceived direction of motion is determined by a majority vote from local motion detectors, which are subject to the aperture problem. As in vision, the conflict between the cues from terminators and other local motion cues is gradually resolved over time so that the perceived direction approaches the veridical direction of motion.

[1]  J. F. Dammann,et al.  The Representation of Stimulus Orientation in the Early Stages of Somatosensory Processing , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  H. J. Arnold.  Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[3]  Monica C. Jackson,et al.  Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 2001 .

[4]  U. Norrsell,et al.  Observations on human tactile directional sensibility. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  F. Kooi.  Local direction of edge motion causes and abolishes the barberpole illusion , 1993, Vision Research.

[6]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. III. A continuum mechanics model of skin predicting mechanoreceptor responses to bars, edges, and gratings. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Hans Wallach.  Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung , 1935 .

[8]  R O Duncan,et al.  Occlusion and the Interpretation of Visual Motion: Perceptual and Neuronal Effects of Context , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  A continuum mechanical model of mechanoreceptive afferent responses to indented spatial patterns. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Anthony J. Movshon,et al.  Visual Response Properties of Striate Cortical Neurons Projecting to Area MT in Macaque Monkeys , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain , 2001, Nature.

[12]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .

[13]  D. G. Kelly,et al.  Effects of traverse length on human perioral directional sensitivity , 1989, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[14]  E. Castet,et al.  Temporal dynamics of motion integration for the initiation of tracking eye movements at ultra-short latencies , 2000, Visual Neuroscience.

[15]  Margaret S Livingstone,et al.  End-Stopping and the Aperture Problem Two-Dimensional Motion Signals in Macaque V1 , 2003, Neuron.

[16]  U. Norrsell,et al.  Spatial cues serving the tactile directional sensibility of the human forearm. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Integration of Contour and Terminator Signals in Visual Area MT of Alert Macaque , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Eric Castet,et al.  The extrinsic/intrinsic classification of two-dimensional motion signals with barber-pole stimuli , 1999, Vision Research.

[19]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[20]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  K O Johnson,et al.  A comparison of visual and two modes of tactual letter resolution , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  David Lindley,et al.  Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990, The Mathematical Gazette.

[23]  B L Anderson,et al.  Stereoscopic occlusion and the aperture problem for motion: a new solution 1 A preliminary version of some of the experiments reported in this paper were presented at the 1994 ARVO conference, Sarasota, Florida. 1 , 1999, Vision Research.

[24]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines , 1993, Vision Research.

[26]  S. Zeki.  Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  H. Wallach.  On the visually perceived direction of motion ' ' by Hans Wallach : 60 years later , 1997 .

[28]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  A dense array stimulator to generate arbitrary spatio-temporal tactile stimuli , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  R. Romo,et al.  Representation of moving tactile stimuli in the somatic sensory cortex of awake monkeys. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  E. P. Gardner,et al.  A quantitative analysis of responses of direction-sensitive neurons in somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[32]  G. Werner,et al.  Cortical information processing of stimulus motion on primate skin. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT , 1998, Vision Research.