Compliant design for intrinsic safety: general issues and preliminary design

We describe some initial results of a project aiming at the development of a programmable compliance, inherently safe robot arm for applications in anthropic environments. In order to obtain safety in spite of worst-case situations (such as unexpected delays in teleoperation, or even controller failure), we propose an approach to achieving the compliance by mechanical rather than by control design. We first describe some of the control problems encountered in a typical, large, possibly unknown mechanical compliance, and present the result that shows the possibility to cope with these uncertainties in an adaptive way. Next, we describe the initial development of a new prototype arm under construction in our laboratory. The arm is designed to achieve arbitrary position tracking in 3D with controlled effective compliance at the joints.

[1]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  McKibben artificial muscles: pneumatic actuators with biomechanical intelligence , 1999, 1999 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (Cat. No.99TH8399).

[2]  J. Salisbury,et al.  Active stiffness control of a manipulator in cartesian coordinates , 1980, 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[3]  Hirochika Inoue,et al.  Whither robotics: key issues, approaches, and applications , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS '96.

[4]  Vladimir J. Lumelsky,et al.  Proximity sensing in robot manipulator motion planning: system and implementation issues , 1989, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Romeo Ortega,et al.  Global regulation of flexible joint robots using approximate differentiation , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  O. Brock,et al.  Robots in Human Environments: Basic Autonomous Capabilities , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  M. Spong Modeling and Control of Elastic Joint Robots , 1987 .

[8]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Cooperative material handling by human and robotic agents: module development and system synthesis , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[9]  Atsushi Konno,et al.  Vibration suppression control of spatial flexible manipulators , 1995 .

[10]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Preliminary design of a whole-arm manipulation system (WAMS) , 1988, Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  A. Krener,et al.  Nonlinear controllability and observability , 1977 .

[12]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Observer design for locally observable analytic systems: Convergence and separation property , 2001 .

[13]  Gill A. Pratt,et al.  Force controllable hydro-elastic actuator , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[14]  A. De Luca Feedforward/feedback laws for the control of flexible robots , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[15]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[16]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[17]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  A general algorithm for dynamic feedback linearization of robots with elastic joints , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[18]  Matthew T. Mason,et al.  Robot Hands and the Mechanics of Manipulation , 1985 .

[19]  Ian W. Hunter,et al.  A comparative analysis of actuator technologies for robotics , 1992 .

[20]  S. Gruber,et al.  Robot hands and the mechanics of manipulation , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[21]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Control of pneumatic muscle actuators , 1995 .