Web-based Cases in Teaching and Learning – the Quality of Discussions and a Stage of Perspective Taking in Asynchronous Communication

The aim of this study is to examine the quality of asynchronous interaction in web-based conferencing among pre-service teachers. Because all successful communication presumes perspective-taking skills and reciprocal understanding among the participants, we study whether the students are able to reach in reciprocal interaction and thus create educationally relevant high-level web-based discussion. The research project has its foundation in socio-constructivist learning theories, one of the most important principles of which is the idea of apprenticeship in thinking. To create a learning project in web-based conferencing we developed pedagogical practices, which enhance higher-level networked communication and make use of theoretical and expert knowledge. The study combines the power of asynchronous conferencing with peer and mentor collaboration to electronically apprentice student learning. The subjects of the study are pre-service teachers in the United States (N ?=?40) and Finland (N ?=?30) who use an asynchronous web-based tool called Conferencing on the Web (COW) to collaborate in creating joint case-based descriptions in different areas of teaching and learning. The results point out different levels of web-based discussion. Three kinds were found: higher-level discussion, progressive discussion and lower-level discussion. More specific analysis of the quality of each discussion level focused on perspective taking in communication. The results support our hypothesis that higher-level perspective taking was related to higher-level discussion.

[1]  Martin Nystrand,et al.  The Structure of Written Communication: Studies in Reciprocity between Writers and Readers , 1986 .

[2]  Ron Thomas,et al.  Web-Based Instruction , 1997, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[3]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Toward a Theory of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning , 1994 .

[4]  P. Häkkinen,et al.  NINTER - Networked Interaction: Theory-Based Cases in Teaching and Learning , 2000 .

[5]  R. Selman,et al.  The Development of Interpersonal Understanding during Childhood, Preadolescence, and Adolescence: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study. , 1982 .

[6]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[7]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Student Role Play in the World Forum: Analyses of an Arctic Adventure Learning Apprenticeship , 1998, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[8]  Katherine K. Merseth.  Supporting Beginning Teachers with Computer Networks. , 1991 .

[9]  Curtis Jay Bonk,et al.  Time to "connect": synchronous and asynchronous case-based dialogue among preservice teachers , 1998 .

[10]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Web-Based Case Conferencing for Preservice Teacher Education: Electronic Discourse from the Field , 1998 .

[11]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning , 1998 .

[12]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Constructivism in the Collaboratory , 1995 .

[13]  Wim Veen,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication Environments in Teacher Education: Computer Conferencing and the Supervision of Student Teachers , 1998 .

[14]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise , 1993 .

[15]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[16]  Ronald W. Marx,et al.  Students' and Teachers' Views of Thinking Processes for Classroom Learning , 1982, The Elementary School Journal.

[17]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[18]  E. Sharp,et al.  Global networks , 1989, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[19]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness , 1990 .

[20]  William R. Beardslee,et al.  Assessing adolescent interpersonal negotiation strategies: Toward the integration of structural and functional models. , 1986 .

[21]  Susan Mcintyre,et al.  Computer-Mediated Discourse: Electronic Dialogue Journaling and Reflective Practice , 1995 .

[22]  R. J. B..  The Child's Conception of the World , 1929, Nature.

[23]  Harvey Mellar,et al.  A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer mediated communication courses , 1996 .

[24]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  The Emergence of Abstract Representations in Dyad Problem Solving , 1995 .

[25]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Virtual Classroom: Learning Without Limits Via Computer Networks , 1994 .

[26]  R. Selman.  growth of interpersonal understanding , 1980 .

[27]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[28]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. , 1996 .

[29]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. , 1994 .

[30]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[31]  M. Riel.  Global education through learning circles , 1993 .

[32]  Karol I. Pelc,et al.  The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks , 1996 .

[33]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse , 1998 .

[34]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change , 1993 .

[35]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .