Analysis of manipulator structures under joint-failure with respect to efficient control in task-specific contexts

Robots are meanwhile able to perform several tasks. But what happens, if one or multiple of the robot's joints fail? Is the robot still able to perform the required tasks? Which capabilities of the robot get limited and which ones are lost? We propose an analysis of manipulator structures for the comparison of a robot's capabilities with respect to efficient control. The comparison is processed (1) within a robot in the case of joint failures and (2) between robots with or without joint failures. It is important, that the analysis can be processed independently of the structure of the manipulator. The results have to be comparable between different manipulator structures. Therefore, an abstract representation of the robot's dynamic capabilities is necessary. We introduce the Maneuverability Volume and the Spinning Pencil for this purpose. The Maneuverability Volume shows, how efficiently the end-effector can be moved to any other position. The Spinning Pencil reflects the robot's capability to change its end-effector orientation efficiently. Our experiments show not only the different capabilities of two manipulator structures, but also the change of the capabilities if one or multiple joints fail.

[1]  Matei T. Ciocarlie,et al.  Dimensionality reduction for hand-independent dexterous robotic grasping , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  Darius Burschka,et al.  Stochastic global optimization for robust point set registration , 2011, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[3]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Manipulability of Robotic Mechanisms , 1985 .

[4]  Francis L. Merat,et al.  Introduction to robotics: Mechanics and control , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Oliver Ruepp Recovery of structure and motion from monocular images under poor lighting and texture conditions , 2012 .

[6]  Kok-Meng Lee,et al.  Kinematic analysis of a three degrees of freedom in-parallel actuated manipulator , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Pradeep K. Khosla,et al.  Dexterity measures for design and control of manipulators , 1991, Proceedings IROS '91:IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems '91.

[8]  Darius Burschka,et al.  Representation of manipulation-relevant object properties and actions for surprise-driven exploration , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Danica Kragic,et al.  Spatio-temporal modeling of grasping actions , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  Kok-Meng Lee,et al.  Dynamic analysis of a three-degrees-of-freedom in-parallel actuated manipulator , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[11]  H. Harry Asada,et al.  Dynamic analysis and design of robot manipulators using inertia ellipsoids , 1984, ICRA.

[12]  J. Denavit,et al.  A kinematic notation for lower pair mechanisms based on matrices , 1955 .

[13]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  The dynamic capability equations: a new tool for analyzing robotic manipulator performance , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Kinematic Design of Serial Link Manipulators From Task Specifications , 1993, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[15]  Jihong Lee A study on the manipulability measures for robot manipulators , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems. Innovative Robotics for Real-World Applications. IROS '97.