Galileo: Perceiving Physical Object Properties by Integrating a Physics Engine with Deep Learning

Humans demonstrate remarkable abilities to predict physical events in dynamic scenes, and to infer the physical properties of objects from static images. We propose a generative model for solving these problems of physical scene understanding from real-world videos and images. At the core of our generative model is a 3D physics engine, operating on an object-based representation of physical properties, including mass, position, 3D shape, and friction. We can infer these latent properties using relatively brief runs of MCMC, which drive simulations in the physics engine to fit key features of visual observations. We further explore directly mapping visual inputs to physical properties, inverting a part of the generative process using deep learning. We name our model Galileo, and evaluate it on a video dataset with simple yet physically rich scenarios. Results show that Galileo is able to infer the physical properties of objects and predict the outcome of a variety of physical events, with an accuracy comparable to human subjects. Our study points towards an account of human vision with generative physical knowledge at its core, and various recognition models as helpers leading to efficient inference.

[1]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  The Helmholtz Machine , 1995, Neural Computation.

[2]  Katsushi Ikeuchi,et al.  Detecting potential falling objects by inferring human action and natural disturbance , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[3]  Tsuhan Chen,et al.  3D Reasoning from Blocks to Stability , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  S. Carey The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[5]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[6]  R. Baillargeon Infants' Physical World , 2004 .

[7]  Pieter Abbeel,et al.  Tracking deformable objects with point clouds , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Jessica B. Hamrick,et al.  Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Efficient analysis-by-synthesis in vision: A computational framework, behavioral tests, and modeling neuronal representations , 2015, Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.

[10]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Learning physics from dynamical scenes , 2014 .

[11]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Learning physical theories from dynamical scenes , 2014, CogSci.

[12]  Vikash K. Mansinghka,et al.  Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects. , 2013, Psychological review.