How students take collective responsibility for productive collaboration: an empirical examination of online discourse

ABSTRACT Collective responsibility matters because it reflects students’ collective efforts and abilities to accomplish successful collaboration. Combining a multi-faceted approach and time-line analysis, this paper aims to examine the emergence and manifestation of collective responsibility in online discourse. Twenty university students participated in online discourse within a supportive online learning environment (Knowledge Forum) while taking a 16-week research methods course. The results reveal developmental dynamics involving social and cognitive aspects of responsibility mapping onto three dimensions: social awareness, complementary contribution, and distributed engagement. Specifically, the students raised social awareness and made complementary contributions progressively in the context of question- and idea-driven collaborative inquiry. Although uneven distributed engagement was found in the responsive interactions, the students could develop cognitive responsibility by changing their involvement throughout the discourse. The present study provides new insight into how the three dimensions of collective responsibility interweave to formulate an integrated force driving productive collaboration, and how individual participatory patterns relate to this developmental process. The study has implications for learning environment designers and educators exploring approaches to incorporating technical and pedagogical adaptive strategies for capturing and fostering collective responsibility during collaboration, to allow them to tap into different levels of uptake.

[1]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge Building , 2008 .

[2]  L. Lipponen.  Towards Knowledge Building: From Facts to Explanations in Primary Students' Computer Mediated Discourse , 2000 .

[3]  Ckk Chan,et al.  Collaborative knowledge building: Towards a knowledge-creation perspective , 2012 .

[4]  Albert Flores,et al.  Collective Responsibility and Professional Roles , 1983, Ethics.

[5]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[6]  Jan van Aalst,et al.  Fixed group and opportunistic collaboration in a CSCL environment , 2015, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[7]  Huang-Yao Hong,et al.  Community knowledge assessment in a knowledge building environment , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[8]  V. Lee,et al.  Collective Responsibility for Learning and Its Effects on Gains in Achievement for Early Secondary School Students , 1996, American Journal of Education.

[9]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age , 2002 .

[10]  Hanni Muukkonen,et al.  Exploring metaskills of knowledge-creating inquiry in higher education , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[11]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[12]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Designs for Collective Cognitive Responsibility in Knowledge-Building Communities , 2009 .

[13]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Developing metadiscourse through reflective assessment in knowledge building environments , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Donatella Cesareni,et al.  The nature of the discourse in web-based Collaborative Learning Environments: Case studies from four different countries , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[16]  Hanni Muukkonen,et al.  Technology-Mediation and Tutoring: How Do They Shape Progressive Inquiry Discourse? , 2005 .

[17]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Rainbow: A framework for analysing computer-mediated pedagogical debates , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[18]  S. Tan,et al.  Perspectives of Knowledge Creation and Implications for Education , 2014 .

[19]  M. Scardamalia.  Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge , 2002 .

[20]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: multiple methods for integrated understanding , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Jan van Aalst.  Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses , 2009, International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning.

[22]  Lynn Clouder,et al.  Electronic [ re ] constitution of groups : Group dynamics 5 from face-to-face to an online setting 6 , 2006 .

[23]  Huang-Yao Hong,et al.  Knowledge Society Network: Toward a Dynamic, Sustained Network for Building Knowledge , 2010 .

[24]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning , 1998 .

[25]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Using integrated electronic environments for collaborative teaching/learning , 2001 .

[26]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds , 2007 .

[27]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Reflective assessment in knowledge building by students with low academic achievement , 2016, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[28]  Yoshiaki Matsuzawa,et al.  Knowledge Building Discourse Explorer: a social network analysis application for knowledge building discourse , 2012 .

[29]  Brook J. Sadler.  Shared Intentions and Shared Responsibility , 2006 .

[30]  A. Eurelings,et al.  Progressive inquiry in CSILE environment: teacher guidance and students’ engagement , 2004 .

[31]  Jan van Aalst,et al.  Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[32]  MISSING-VALUE MISSING-VALUE,et al.  Knowledge Building , 2017 .