Neural signatures of strategic types in a two-person bargaining game

The management and manipulation of our own social image in the minds of others requires difficult and poorly understood computations. One computation useful in social image management is strategic deception: our ability and willingness to manipulate other people's beliefs about ourselves for gain. We used an interpersonal bargaining game to probe the capacity of players to manage their partner's beliefs about them. This probe parsed the group of subjects into three behavioral types according to their revealed level of strategic deception; these types were also distinguished by neural data measured during the game. The most deceptive subjects emitted behavioral signals that mimicked a more benign behavioral type, and their brains showed differential activation in right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left Brodmann area 10 at the time of this deception. In addition, strategic types showed a significant correlation between activation in the right temporoparietal junction and expected payoff that was absent in the other groups. The neurobehavioral types identified by the game raise the possibility of identifying quantitative biomarkers for the capacity to manipulate and maintain a social image in another person's mind.

[1]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[2]  J. Sobel,et al.  STRATEGIC INFORMATION TRANSMISSION , 1982 .

[3]  D. Stahl,et al.  On Players' Models of Other Players: Theory and Experimental Evidence , 1995 .

[4]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study , 1998 .

[5]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[6]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[7]  Colin Camerer,et al.  A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games , 2004 .

[8]  A. Owen,et al.  Anterior prefrontal cortex: insights into function from anatomy and neuroimaging , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Saxe,et al.  Making sense of another mind: The role of the right temporo-parietal junction , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neural Systems Responding to Degrees of Uncertainty in Human Decision-Making , 2005, Science.

[11]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[12]  Colin Camerer,et al.  “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  Meghana Bhatt,et al.  Self-Referential Thinking and Equilibrium as States of Mind in Games: Fmri Evidence , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[14]  C. Frith,et al.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[16]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Neural Signatures of Economic Preferences for Risk and Ambiguity , 2006, Neuron.

[17]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  Overlapping and non-overlapping brain regions for theory of mind and self reflection in individual subjects. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[18]  Iroise Dumontheil,et al.  Function and localization within rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  C. Keysers,et al.  Integrating simulation and theory of mind: from self to social cognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Aaron C. Koralek,et al.  Two Takes on the Social Brain: A Comparison of Theory of Mind Tasks , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Aumann,et al.  Unraveling in Guessing Games : An Experimental Study , 2007 .

[23]  Iroise Dumontheil,et al.  The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  J. Decety,et al.  The Role of the Right Temporoparietal Junction in Social Interaction: How Low-Level Computational Processes Contribute to Meta-Cognition , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[25]  Peter Bossaerts,et al.  Neural correlates of mentalizing-related computations during strategic interactions in humans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Mark W Woolrich,et al.  Associative learning of social value , 2008, Nature.

[27]  Jason P. Mitchell Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Chen-Ying Huang,et al.  Intuition and Deliberation: Two Systems for Strategizing in the Brain , 2009, Science.

[29]  Jeremy R. Reynolds,et al.  Distinct neural circuits support transient and sustained processes in prospective memory and working memory. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Conflict-induced behavioural adjustment: a clue to the executive functions of the prefrontal cortex , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  R. Nagel,et al.  Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Disrupting the prefrontal cortex diminishes the human ability to build a good reputation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Uta Frith,et al.  Reputation management in the age of the world-wide web , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cooperation and Heterogeneity of the Autistic Mind , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.