Activity‐dependent regulation of ‘on’ and ‘off’ responses in cat visual cortical receptive fields

1 A supervised learning procedure was applied to individual cat area 17 neurons to test the possible role of neuronal co‐activity in controlling the plasticity of the spatial ‘on‐off’ organization of visual cortical receptive fields (RFs). 2 Differential pairing between visual input evoked in a fixed position of the RF and preset levels of postsynaptic firing (imposed iontophoretically) were used alternately to boost the ‘on’ (or ‘off’) response to a ‘high’ level of firing (S+ pairing), and to reduce the opponent response (respectively ‘off’ or ‘on’) in the same position to a ‘low’ level (S− pairing). This associative procedure was repeated 50‐100 times at a low temporal frequency (0.1‐0.15 s−1). 3 Long‐lasting modifications of the ratio of ‘on‐off’ responses, measured in the paired position or integrated across the whole RF, were found in 44 % of the conditioned neurons (17/39), and in most cases this favoured the S+ paired characteristic. The amplitude change was on average half of that imposed during pairing. Comparable proportions of modified cells were obtained in ‘simple’ (13/27) and ‘complex’ (4/12) RFs, both in adult cats (4/11) and in kittens within the critical period (13/28). 4 The spatial selectivity of the pairing effects was studied by pseudorandomly stimulating both paired and spatially distinct unpaired positions within the RF. Most modifications were observed in the paired position (for 88 % of successful pairings). 5 In some cells (n= 13), a fixed delay pairing procedure was applied, in which the temporal phase of the onset of the current pulse was shifted by a few hundred milliseconds from the presentation or offset of the visual stimulus. Consecutive effects were observed in 4/13 cells, which retained the temporal pattern of activity imposed during pairing for 5‐40 min. They were expressed in the paired region only. 6 The demonstration of long‐lasting adaptive changes in the ratio of ‘on’ and ‘off’ responses, expressed in localized subregions of the RF, leads us to suggest that simple and complex RF organizations might be two stable functional states derived from a common connectivity scheme.

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  G. Stent A physiological mechanism for Hebb's postulate of learning. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Visual Experience without Lines: Effect on Developing Cortical Neurons , 1973, Science.

[4]  C. Bruce,et al.  Operant Conditioning of Single-Unit Response Patterns in Visual Cortex , 1974, Science.

[5]  W. Singer,et al.  Organization of cat striate cortex: a correlation of receptive-field properties with afferent and efferent connections. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Sillito The contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to the receptive field properties of neurones in the striate cortex of the cat. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  Early development of visual cortical cells in normal and dark‐reared kittens: relationship between orientation selectivity and ocular dominance. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  P. Heggelund,et al.  Receptive field organization of simple cells in cat striate cortex , 1981, Experimental brain research.

[9]  L. Palmer,et al.  Receptive-field structure in cat striate cortex. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  K. Tanaka Cross-correlation analysis of geniculostriate neuronal relationships in cats. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  Development of neuronal selectivity in primary visual cortex of cat. , 1984, Physiological reviews.

[12]  K. Albus,et al.  Early post‐natal development of neuronal function in the kitten's visual cortex: a laminar analysis. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  P Heggelund,et al.  Quantitative studies of the discharge fields of single cells in cat striate cortex. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  D N Mastronarde,et al.  Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Receptive-field properties and classification of cells. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  A. Baranyi,et al.  Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission requires postnaptic modifications in the neocortex , 1987, Brain Research.

[16]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  A cellular analogue of visual cortical plasticity , 1988, Nature.

[17]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  A cellular analogue of visual cortical plasticity , 1988, Nature.

[18]  D. Ferster Spatially opponent excitation and inhibition in simple cells of the cat visual cortex , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Associative long-term depression in the hippocampus induced by hebbian covariance , 1989, Nature.

[20]  D. B. Bowling,et al.  ON/OFF organization in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus: Sublaminae vs. columns , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  R. Andrew,et al.  A technique for controlling the membrane potential of neurons during unit recording , 1990, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  R. Douglas,et al.  A functional microcircuit for cat visual cortex. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  R M Douglas,et al.  Position-specific adaptation in simple cell receptive fields of the cat striate cortex. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Simulations of cortical pyramidal neurons synchronized by inhibitory interneurons. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  E. Capaldi,et al.  The organization of behavior. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[26]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  Cellular analogs of visual cortical epigenesis. I. Plasticity of orientation selectivity , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  Cellular analogs of visual cortical epigenesis. II. Plasticity of binocular integration , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  W. N. Ross,et al.  Synaptically activated increases in Ca2+ concentration in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells are primarily due to voltage-gated Ca2+ channels , 1992, Neuron.

[29]  C. Hammond,et al.  Evidence for a Slowly Inactivating K+ Current in Prefrontal Cortical Cells , 1992, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  Y. Komatsu,et al.  Low-threshold Ca2+ channels mediate induction of long-term potentiation in kitten visual cortex. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  W. Singer,et al.  Long-term depression of excitatory synaptic transmission and its relationship to long-term potentiation , 1993, Trends in Neurosciences.

[32]  Y. Komatsu,et al.  Age-dependent long-term potentiation of inhibitory synaptic transmission in rat visual cortex , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  S. Nelson,et al.  Orientation selectivity of cortical neurons during intracellular blockade of inhibition. , 1994, Science.

[34]  G. Barrionuevo,et al.  Excitatory stimulation during postsynaptic inhibition induces long-term depression in hippocampus in vivo. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  David A. Smith,et al.  Temporal covariance of pre- and postsynaptic activity regulates functional connectivity in the visual cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  D. Debanne,et al.  Asynchronous pre- and postsynaptic activity induces associative long-term depression in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus in vitro. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  R. Reid,et al.  Specificity of monosynaptic connections from thalamus to visual cortex , 1995, Nature.

[38]  Y. Komatsu,et al.  GABAB Receptors, Monoamine Receptors, and Postsynaptic Inositol Trisphosphate-Induced Ca2+ Release Are Involved in the Induction of Long-Term Potentiation at Visual Cortical Inhibitory Synapses , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  J. Gaiarsa,et al.  Bidirectional plasticity expressed by GABAergic synapses in the neonatal rat hippocampus. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  N. Weinberger,et al.  Receptive-field plasticity in the adult auditory cortex induced by Hebbian covariance , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  D. Johnston,et al.  A Synaptically Controlled, Associative Signal for Hebbian Plasticity in Hippocampal Neurons , 1997, Science.

[42]  E Guigon,et al.  Bistable behaviour in a neocortical neurone model , 1997, Neuroreport.