Energy functions in de novo protein design: current challenges and future prospects.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Yaoqi Zhou | Yuedong Yang | J. Zhan | Liang Dai | Zhixiu Li | Jian Zhan
[1] G M Edelman,et al. Favin versus concanavalin A: Circularly permuted amino acid sequences. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[2] P. Privalov. Stability of proteins: small globular proteins. , 1979, Advances in protein chemistry.
[3] M. Karplus,et al. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .
[4] L. Regan,et al. Characterization of a helical protein designed from first principles. , 1988, Science.
[5] D Eisenberg,et al. Crystal structure of alpha 1: implications for protein design. , 1990, Science.
[6] T. Blundell,et al. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.
[7] John C. Wootton,et al. Statistics of Local Complexity in Amino Acid Sequences and Sequence Databases , 1993, Comput. Chem..
[8] L. H. Bradley,et al. Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. , 1993, Methods in molecular biology.
[9] Roland L. Dunbrack,et al. Conformational analysis of the backbone-dependent rotamer preferences of protein sidechains , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.
[10] J. Richardson,et al. Betadoublet: de novo design, synthesis, and characterization of a beta-sandwich protein. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[11] E. Milner-White,et al. Coulombic interactions between partially charged main-chain atoms not hydrogen-bonded to each other influence the conformations of alpha-helices and antiparallel beta-sheet. A new method for analysing the forces between hydrogen bonding groups in proteins includes all the Coulombic interactions. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[12] K A Dill,et al. Modeling protein stability as heteropolymer collapse. , 1995, Advances in protein chemistry.
[13] K. Dill,et al. Designing amino acid sequences to fold with good hydrophobic cores. , 1995, Protein engineering.
[14] W. L. Jorgensen,et al. Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids , 1996 .
[15] Philip Lijnzaad,et al. A method for detecting hydrophobic patches on protein surfaces , 1996, Proteins.
[16] H W Hellinga,et al. Construction of a catalytically active iron superoxide dismutase by rational protein design. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[17] G. Schneider,et al. Circular permutations of natural protein sequences: structural evidence. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.
[18] S. L. Mayo,et al. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. , 1997, Science.
[19] S. L. Mayo,et al. Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[20] P. S. Kim,et al. High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. , 1998, Science.
[21] J R Desjarlais,et al. From coiled coils to small globular proteins: Design of a native‐like three‐helix bundle , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[22] Volker Sieber,et al. Surface‐exposed phenylalanines in the RNP1/RNP2 motif stabilize the cold‐shock protein CspB from Bacillus subtilis , 1998, Proteins.
[23] Tanja Kortemme,et al. Design of a 20-Amino Acid, Three-Stranded β-Sheet Protein , 1998 .
[24] C. Deane,et al. Carbonyl-carbonyl interactions stabilize the partially allowed Ramachandran conformations of asparagine and aspartic acid. , 1999, Protein engineering.
[25] M. Karplus,et al. Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.
[26] W. DeGrado,et al. Solution structure and dynamics of a de novo designed three-helix bundle protein. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[27] R. Glockshuber,et al. Random circular permutation of DsbA reveals segments that are essential for protein folding and stability. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[28] D. Baker,et al. Improved recognition of native‐like protein structures using a combination of sequence‐dependent and sequence‐independent features of proteins , 1999, Proteins.
[29] T. Creamer. Side‐chain conformational entropy in protein unfolded states , 2000, Proteins.
[30] Automated protein design and sequence optimisation: scoring functions and the search problem. , 2000, Current protein & peptide science.
[31] D. Baker,et al. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[32] S J Wodak,et al. Automatic protein design with all atom force-fields by exact and heuristic optimization. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[33] Tsutomu Nakamura,et al. Systematic circular permutation of an entire protein reveals essential folding elements , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.
[34] D Poso,et al. Progressive Stabilization of Intermediate and Transition States in Protein Folding Reactions by Introducing Surface Hydrophobic Residues* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[35] B. Rost. Review: protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. , 2001, Journal of structural biology.
[36] P. Romero,et al. Sequence complexity of disordered protein , 2001, Proteins.
[37] Kam Y. J. Zhang,et al. Conversion of monomeric protein L to an obligate dimer by computational protein design , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[38] T M Handel,et al. Review: protein design--where we were, where we are, where we're going. , 2001, Journal of structural biology.
[39] Kam Y. J. Zhang,et al. Accurate computer-based design of a new backbone conformation in the second turn of protein L. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[40] V. Rybin,et al. Computer-aided design of a PDZ domain to recognize new target sequences , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.
[41] Christopher A. Voigt,et al. De novo design of biocatalysts. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[42] Julia M. Shifman,et al. Modulating calmodulin binding specificity through computational protein design. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[43] Pinak Chakrabarti,et al. Quantifying the accessible surface area of protein residues in their local environment. , 2002, Protein engineering.
[44] Hongyi Zhou,et al. Distance‐scaled, finite ideal‐gas reference state improves structure‐derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[45] Rama Ranganathan,et al. Knowledge-based potential functions in protein design. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.
[46] N. Grishin,et al. Side‐chain modeling with an optimized scoring function , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[47] L. Looger,et al. Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions , 2003, Nature.
[48] C. Dobson,et al. Rationalization of the effects of mutations on peptide andprotein aggregation rates , 2003, Nature.
[49] S. L. Mayo,et al. De novo backbone and sequence design of an idealized α/β-barrel protein: evidence of stable tertiary structure , 2003 .
[50] D. Baker,et al. A large scale test of computational protein design: folding and stability of nine completely redesigned globular proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[51] D. Baker,et al. Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.
[52] Ian W. Davis,et al. Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation , 2003, Proteins.
[53] Loren L Looger,et al. Computational Design of a Biologically Active Enzyme , 2004, Science.
[54] Navin Pokala,et al. Energy functions for protein design I: Efficient and accurate continuum electrostatics and solvation , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[55] Nick V Grishin,et al. Effective scoring function for protein sequence design , 2003, Proteins.
[56] D. Baker,et al. Close agreement between the orientation dependence of hydrogen bonds observed in protein structures and quantum mechanical calculations. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[57] David Baker,et al. Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta , 2004, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D.
[58] R. Nussinov,et al. In silico protein design by combinatorial assembly of protein building blocks , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[59] D Thirumalai,et al. Development of novel statistical potentials for protein fold recognition. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.
[60] N. Pokala,et al. Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[61] Hongyi Zhou,et al. Fold recognition by combining sequence profiles derived from evolution and from depth‐dependent structural alignment of fragments , 2004, Proteins.
[62] Stephen L Mayo,et al. Computationally designed variants of Escherichia coli chorismate mutase show altered catalytic activity. , 2005, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.
[63] M. Ota,et al. Design of λ Cro Fold: Solution Structure of a Monomeric Variant of the De Novo Protein , 2005 .
[64] François Diederich,et al. Orthogonal multipolar interactions in structural chemistry and biology. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.
[65] Christopher T. Saunders,et al. Recapitulation of protein family divergence using flexible backbone protein design. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[66] Stephen L Mayo,et al. Electrostatics in computational protein design. , 2005, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[67] Woody Sherman,et al. Affinity enhancement of an in vivo matured therapeutic antibody using structure‐based computational design , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[68] Yi Liu,et al. RosettaDesign server for protein design , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..
[69] B. Kuhlman,et al. Computational design of a single amino acid sequence that can switch between two distinct protein folds. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[70] Brian Kuhlman,et al. Design of protein conformational switches. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.
[71] G. A. Lazar,et al. Engineered antibody Fc variants with enhanced effector function. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[72] Marianne Rooman,et al. Development of Novel Statistical Potentials Describing Cation-pi Interactions in Proteins and Comparison with Semiempirical and Quantum Chemistry Approaches , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[73] David Baker,et al. High-resolution structural validation of the computational redesign of human U1A protein. , 2006, Structure.
[74] Rama Ranganathan,et al. Knowledge-based potentials in protein design. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.
[75] D. Baker,et al. Computational redesign of endonuclease DNA binding and cleavage specificity , 2006, Nature.
[76] D. Baker,et al. High-resolution Structural and Thermodynamic Analysis of Extreme Stabilization of Human Procarboxypeptidase by Computational Protein Design , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.
[77] Jenn-Kang Hwang,et al. pKNOT: the protein KNOT web server , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..
[78] Peter Virnau,et al. Protein knot server: detection of knots in protein structures , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..
[79] Bruce Tidor,et al. Progress in computational protein design. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[80] K. Sharp,et al. Potential energy functions for protein design. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.
[81] Hongyi Zhou,et al. What is a desirable statistical energy functions for proteins and how can it be obtained? , 2007, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.
[82] Hong Cheng,et al. De novo design of a single-chain diphenylporphyrin metalloprotein. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[83] Geoffrey K. Hom,et al. Full-sequence computational design and solution structure of a thermostable protein variant. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.
[84] Brian Kuhlman,et al. High-resolution design of a protein loop , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[85] Xiaozhen Hu,et al. Computer-based redesign of a beta sandwich protein suggests that extensive negative design is not required for de novo beta sheet design. , 2008, Structure.
[86] Eric A. Althoff,et al. De Novo Computational Design of Retro-Aldol Enzymes , 2008, Science.
[87] C. Stordeur,et al. The NMR solution structure of the artificial protein M7 matches the computationally designed model , 2008, Proteins.
[88] Yaoqi Zhou,et al. Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein terminal regions with secondary structures , 2008, Proteins.
[89] A Keith Dunker,et al. Exploring the molecular design of protein interaction sites with molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations. , 2009, Biochemistry.
[90] William R Taylor,et al. Probing the "dark matter" of protein fold space. , 2009, Structure.
[91] Tanja Kortemme,et al. Backbone flexibility in computational protein design. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[92] Gevorg Grigoryan,et al. Design of protein-interaction specificity affords selective bZIP-binding peptides , 2009, Nature.
[93] Yaoqi Zhou,et al. Improving the prediction accuracy of residue solvent accessibility and real‐value backbone torsion angles of proteins by guided‐learning through a two‐layer neural network , 2009, Proteins.
[94] L. Lai,et al. De Novo Design of a βαβ Motif , 2009 .
[95] Christopher C. Moser,et al. Design and engineering of an O(2) transport protein , 2009, Nature.
[96] Alfonso Jaramillo,et al. Challenges in the computational design of proteins , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[97] Yuedong Yang,et al. Predicting continuous local structure and the effect of its substitution for secondary structure in fragment-free protein structure prediction. , 2009, Structure.
[98] Jianpeng Ma,et al. Explicit orientation dependence in empirical potentials and its significance to side-chain modeling. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.
[99] Birte Höcker,et al. Computational design of ligand binding is not a solved problem , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[100] Amy E Keating,et al. X‐ray vs. NMR structures as templates for computational protein design , 2009, Proteins.
[101] Yaoqi Zhou,et al. Improving computational protein design by using structure‐derived sequence profile , 2010, Proteins.
[102] Martin Zacharias,et al. Binding site prediction and improved scoring during flexible protein–protein docking with ATTRACT , 2010, Proteins.
[103] Jasmine L. Gallaher,et al. Computational Design of an Enzyme Catalyst for a Stereoselective Bimolecular Diels-Alder Reaction , 2010, Science.
[104] Alessandro Laio,et al. Exploring the Universe of Protein Structures beyond the Protein Data Bank , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[105] Lukasz Goldschmidt,et al. Structure and folding of a designed knotted protein , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[106] Peter Virnau,et al. Structures and folding pathways of topologically knotted proteins , 2011, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.
[107] Samuel L. DeLuca,et al. Design of native-like proteins through an exposure-dependent environment potential. , 2011, Biochemistry.
[108] Anna Tramontano,et al. Evaluation of disorder predictions in CASP9 , 2011, Proteins.
[109] Timothy A. Whitehead,et al. Computational Design of Proteins Targeting the Conserved Stem Region of Influenza Hemagglutinin , 2011, Science.
[110] Yaoqi Zhou,et al. Protein side chain modeling with orientation‐dependent atomic force fields derived by series expansions , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..
[111] Yaoqi Zhou,et al. Improving protein fold recognition and template-based modeling by employing probabilistic-based matching between predicted one-dimensional structural properties of query and corresponding native properties of templates , 2011, Bioinform..
[112] Sumudu P. Leelananda,et al. Multibody coarse‐grained potentials for native structure recognition and quality assessment of protein models , 2011, Proteins.
[113] Rhiju Das,et al. Four Small Puzzles That Rosetta Doesn't Solve , 2011, PloS one.
[114] Kengo Kinoshita,et al. Community-wide assessment of protein-interface modeling suggests improvements to design methodology. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.
[115] J. Meiler,et al. Exploring symmetry as an avenue to the computational design of large protein domains. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[116] Yaoqi Zhou,et al. Characterizing the existing and potential structural space of proteins by large-scale multiple loop permutations. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.
[117] Yang Zhang,et al. Computational protein design and large-scale assessment by I-TASSER structure assembly simulations. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.
[118] A Keith Dunker,et al. SPINE-D: Accurate Prediction of Short and Long Disordered Regions by a Single Neural-Network Based Method , 2012, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.
[119] B. Kuhlman,et al. Computational protein design with explicit consideration of surface hydrophobic patches , 2012, Proteins.
[120] B. Kuhlman,et al. Increasing sequence diversity with flexible backbone protein design: the complete redesign of a protein hydrophobic core. , 2012, Structure.
[121] Bruce Randall Donald,et al. Protein Design Using Continuous Rotamers , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[122] Lukasz A. Kurgan,et al. SPINE X: Improving protein secondary structure prediction by multistep learning coupled with prediction of solvent accessible surface area and backbone torsion angles , 2012, J. Comput. Chem..