Increasing sequence diversity with flexible backbone protein design: the complete redesign of a protein hydrophobic core.

[1]  W. Kabsch,et al.  How good are predictions of protein secondary structure? , 1983, FEBS letters.

[2]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Stereospecific nuclear magnetic resonance assignments of the methyl groups of valine and leucine in the DNA-binding domain of the 434 repressor by biosynthetically directed fractional 13C labeling. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[3]  K. Dill.  Dominant forces in protein folding. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[4]  J. Richardson,et al.  De novo design, expression, and characterization of Felix: a four-helix bundle protein of native-like sequence. , 1990, Science.

[5]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  Processing of multi-dimensional NMR data with the new software PROSA , 1992 .

[6]  D Eisenberg,et al.  Crystal structure of a synthetic triple-stranded alpha-helical bundle. , 1993, Science.

[7]  L. H. Bradley,et al.  Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. , 1993, Methods in molecular biology.

[8]  P S Kim,et al.  Measurement of the beta-sheet-forming propensities of amino acids. , 1994, Nature.

[9]  F. Richards,et al.  The crystal structure of a mutant protein with altered but improved hydrophobic core packing. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  C. Pace,et al.  Denaturant m values and heat capacity changes: Relation to changes in accessible surface areas of protein unfolding , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[11]  P S Kim,et al.  Repacking protein cores with backbone freedom: structure prediction for coiled coils. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  J. Cavanagh.  Protein NMR Spectroscopy: Principles and Practice , 1995 .

[13]  J M Sturtevant,et al.  What makes a protein a protein? Hydrophobic core designs that specify stability and structural properties , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[14]  G. Montelione,et al.  Automated analysis of protein NMR assignments using methods from artificial intelligence. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  DeGrado,et al.  Engineering and design Screening, selection and design: standing at the crossroads in three dimensions. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[16]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[17]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  S L Mayo,et al.  Coupling backbone flexibility and amino acid sequence selection in protein design , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  P. S. Kim,et al.  High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. , 1998, Science.

[21]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  Global analysis of the thermal and chemical denaturation of the N-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9 in H2O and D2O. Determination of the thermodynamic parameters, deltaH(o), deltaS(o), and deltaC(o)p and evaluation of solvent isotope effects. , 1998, Protein Science.

[22]  Stephen L. Mayo,et al.  Design, structure and stability of a hyperthermophilic protein variant , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[23]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[24]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  Global analysis of the thermal and chemical denaturation of the N‐terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9 in H2O and D2O. Determination of the thermodynamic parameters, ΔH°, ΔS°, and ΔC°p, and evaluation of solvent isotope effects , 1998 .

[25]  S. A. Marshall,et al.  Energy functions for protein design. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[26]  J R Desjarlais,et al.  Side-chain and backbone flexibility in protein core design. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  A. Bax,et al.  Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology , 1999, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[28]  W. DeGrado,et al.  A polar, solvent-exposed residue can be essential for native protein structure. , 2000, Structure.

[29]  L. Regan,et al.  Dramatic structural and thermodynamic consequences of repacking a protein's hydrophobic core. , 2000, Structure.

[30]  D. Baker,et al.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  H N Moseley,et al.  Automatic determination of protein backbone resonance assignments from triple resonance nuclear magnetic resonance data. , 2001, Methods in enzymology.

[32]  T M Handel,et al.  Review: protein design--where we were, where we are, where we're going. , 2001, Journal of structural biology.

[33]  W. DeGrado,et al.  Hydrophobic core malleability of a de novo designed three-helix bundle protein. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  Kam Y. J. Zhang,et al.  Accurate computer-based design of a new backbone conformation in the second turn of protein L. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  Roland L. Dunbrack.  Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[36]  Torsten Herrmann,et al.  Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  D. Baker,et al.  A large scale test of computational protein design: folding and stability of nine completely redesigned globular proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[39]  M. Nilges,et al.  Refinement of protein structures in explicit solvent , 2003, Proteins.

[40]  Fei Long,et al.  REFMAC5 dictionary: organization of prior chemical knowledge and guidelines for its use. , 2004, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[41]  David C. Richardson,et al.  MOLPROBITY: structure validation and all-atom contact analysis for nucleic acids and their complexes , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  R. Keller,et al.  The Computer Aided Resonance Assignment Tutorial , 2004 .

[43]  Thomas Szyperski,et al.  G-matrix Fourier transform NOESY-based protocol for high-quality protein structure determination. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[44]  T. Szyperski,et al.  NMR solution structure of Thermotoga maritima protein TM1509 reveals a Zn-metalloprotease-like tertiary structure , 2005, Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics.

[45]  Martin Phillips,et al.  Toward the structural genomics of complexes: crystal structure of a PE/PPE protein complex from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Feng Ding,et al.  Modeling backbone flexibility improves protein stability estimation. , 2007, Structure.

[47]  D. Baker,et al.  High-resolution Structural and Thermodynamic Analysis of Extreme Stabilization of Human Procarboxypeptidase by Computational Protein Design , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  Bruce Randall Donald,et al.  Dead-End Elimination with Backbone Flexibility , 2007, ISMB/ECCB.

[49]  A. Keating,et al.  Computing van der Waals energies in the context of the rotamer approximation , 2007, Proteins.

[50]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  High-resolution design of a protein loop , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Gaetano T Montelione,et al.  Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia , 2006, Proteins.

[52]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Phaser crystallographic software , 2007, Journal of applied crystallography.

[53]  Colin A. Smith,et al.  A simple model of backbone flexibility improves modeling of side-chain conformational variability. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  Martin S. Taylor,et al.  Toward full-sequence de novo protein design with flexible templates for human beta-defensin-2. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[55]  Christian Cole,et al.  The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[56]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Backbone flexibility in computational protein design. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[57]  Jasmine L. Gallaher,et al.  Alteration of enzyme specificity by computational loop remodeling and design , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  George I Makhatadze,et al.  Protein stabilization by the rational design of surface charge-charge interactions. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[59]  David Baker,et al.  Motif‐directed flexible backbone design of functional interactions , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[60]  David Baker,et al.  Blind docking of pharmaceutically relevant compounds using RosettaLigand , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[61]  Gevorg Grigoryan,et al.  Cluster expansion models for flexible‐backbone protein energetics , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[62]  D. Baker,et al.  RosettaHoles: Rapid assessment of protein core packing for structure prediction, refinement, design, and validation , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[63]  P. Emsley,et al.  Features and development of Coot , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[64]  L. Stamatatos,et al.  Computational protein design using flexible backbone remodeling and resurfacing: case studies in structure-based antigen design. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[65]  Gevorg Grigoryan,et al.  Probing designability via a generalized model of helical bundle geometry. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[66]  Jens Meiler,et al.  ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[67]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions. , 2011, Structure.

[68]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments , 2011, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[69]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Computational design of the sequence and structure of a protein-binding peptide. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[70]  James J Havranek,et al.  Automated selection of stabilizing mutations in designed and natural proteins , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.