Testing Game Theory in the Field: Swedish LUPI Lottery Games

Game theory is usually difficult to test precisely in the field because predictions typically depend sensitively on features that are not controlled or observed. We conduct one such test using field data from the Swedish lowest unique positive integer (LUPI) game. In the LUPI game, players pick positive integers and whoever chose the lowest unique number wins a fixed prize. Theoretical equilibrium predictions are derived assuming Poisson-distributed uncertainty about the number of players, and tested using both field and laboratory data. The field and lab data show similar patterns. Despite various deviations from equilibrium, there is a surprising degree of convergence toward equilibrium. Some of the deviations from equilibrium can be rationalized by a cognitive hierarchy model.

[1]  John Morgan,et al.  When Do Markets Tip? A Cognitive Hierarchy Approach , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[2]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Structural Models of Nonequilibrium Strategic Thinking: Theory, Evidence, and Applications , 2013 .

[3]  Alexander L. Brown,et al.  Estimating Structural Models of Equilibrium and Cognitive Hierarchy Thinking in the Field: The Case of Withheld Movie Critic Reviews , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Sebastian Bernhardsson,et al.  Equilibrium strategy and population-size effects in lowest unique bid auctions. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[5]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  The Promise and Success of Lab-Field Generalizability in Experimental Economics: A Critical Reply to Levitt and List , 2011 .

[6]  Harold Houba,et al.  Endogenous entry in lowest-unique sealed-bid auctions , 2011 .

[7]  Robert Östling,et al.  When Does Communication Improve Coordination , 2010 .

[8]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Testing Game Theory in the Field: Swedish LUPI Lottery Games , 2010 .

[9]  J. Heckman,et al.  Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[10]  Andrea Gallice,et al.  Lowest Unique Bid Auctions with Signals , 2009 .

[11]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  Heterogeneous quantal response equilibrium and cognitive hierarchies , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  Dan Lovallo,et al.  To Review or Not to Review? Limited Strategic Thinking at the Movie Box Office , 2009 .

[13]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Unique Bid Auction Games , 2009 .

[14]  M. Friedman,et al.  The Methodology of Positive Economics , 2010 .

[15]  Jürgen Eichberger,et al.  Least Unmatched Price Auctions: A First Approach , 2008 .

[16]  Morten I. Lau,et al.  Risk Aversion in Game Shows , 2008 .

[17]  Harold Houba,et al.  The Unique-Lowest Sealed-Bid Auction , 2008 .

[18]  R. Thaler,et al.  Deal or No Deal? Decision Making under Risk in a Large-Payoff Game Show , 2008 .

[19]  V. Crawford,et al.  Level-k Auctions: Can a Non-Equilibrium Model of Strategic Thinking Explain the Winner's Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions? , 2007 .

[20]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Unique Bid Auctions: Equilibrium Solutions and Experimental Evidence , 2007 .

[21]  Gabor Virag,et al.  Gambling By Auctions , 2007 .

[22]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World , 2007 .

[23]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  Self-tuning experience weighted attraction learning in games , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.

[24]  Robert L. Slonim,et al.  Learning and equilibrium as useful approximations: Accuracy of prediction on randomly selected constant sum games , 2007 .

[25]  U. Fischbacher z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[26]  Shih-Hsun Hsu,et al.  Minimax Play at Wimbledon: Comment , 2007 .

[27]  David K. Levine,et al.  The Paradox of Voter Participation? A Laboratory Study , 2007, American Political Science Review.

[28]  R. Aumann,et al.  Unraveling in Guessing Games : An Experimental Study , 2007 .

[29]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Biases in casino betting: The hot hand and the gambler’s fallacy , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.

[30]  V. Crawford,et al.  Fatal Attraction: Focality, Naivete, and Sophistication in Experimental "Hide-and-Seek" Games , 2007 .

[31]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[32]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  An Explanation of Anomalous Behavior in Models of Political Participation , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[33]  Colin Camerer,et al.  A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games , 2004 .

[34]  R. Sarin,et al.  Strategy Similarity and Coordination , 2004 .

[35]  A. Roth Introduction to Experimental Economics , 2004 .

[36]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Cognition and Behavior in Two-Person Guessing Games: An Experimental Study , 2003 .

[37]  Ignacio Palacios-Huerta Professionals Play Minimax , 2003 .

[38]  V. Crawford Lying for Strategic Advantage: Rational and Boundedly Rational Misrepresentation of Intentions , 2003 .

[39]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  Quantal Response Equilibrium and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[40]  T. Scharping Hide-and-seek: China's elusive population data , 2001 .

[41]  J. Wooders,et al.  Minimax Play at Wimbledon , 2001 .

[42]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Ten Little Treasures of Game Theory and Ten Intuitive Contradictions , 2001 .

[43]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Large Poisson Games , 2000, J. Econ. Theory.

[44]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework , 1999 .

[45]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Experience‐weighted Attraction Learning in Normal Form Games , 1999 .

[46]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Population uncertainty and Poisson games , 1998, Int. J. Game Theory.

[47]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study , 1998 .

[48]  E. Damme On the state of the art in game theory : An interview with Robert Aumann , 1998 .

[49]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  Experience-Weighted Attraction Learning in Coordination Games: Probability Rules, Heterogeneity, and Time-Variation. , 1998, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[50]  J. Friedman,et al.  Boundedly Rational Nash Equilibrium: A Probabilistic Choice Approach☆☆☆ , 1997 .

[51]  D. Stahl,et al.  On Players' Models of Other Players: Theory and Experimental Evidence , 1995 .

[52]  R. McKelvey,et al.  Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games , 1995 .

[53]  R. Nagel Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study , 1995 .

[54]  A. Roth,et al.  Learning in Extensive-Form Games: Experimental Data and Simple Dynamic Models in the Intermediate Term* , 1995 .

[55]  Jörgen W. Weibull,et al.  Evolutionary Game Theory , 1996 .

[56]  R. Selten,et al.  Experimental Sealed Bid First Price Auctions with Directly Observed Bid Functions , 1994 .

[57]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Introduction to Experimental Economics , 1992 .

[58]  Philip A. Haile,et al.  On the Empirical Content of Quantal Response Equilibrium , 2003 .

[59]  E. Maskin,et al.  The Existence of Equilibrium in Discontinuous Economic Games, I: Theory , 1986 .

[60]  C. Granger,et al.  Improved methods of combining forecasts , 1984 .

[61]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[62]  R. Rosenthal A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria , 1973 .

[63]  W. Brogden Annual Review of Psychology , 1957 .

[64]  M. Friedman,et al.  Essays in Positive Economics , 1954 .