Reconceptualizing second-person interaction

Over the last couple of decades, most neuroscientific research on social cognition has been dominated by a third-person paradigm in which participating subjects are not actively engaging with other agents but merely observe them. Recently this paradigm has been challenged by researchers who promote a second-person approach to social cognition, and emphasize the importance of dynamic, real-time interactions with others. The present article's contribution to this debate is twofold. First, we critically analyze the second-person challenge to social neuroscience, and assess the various ways in which the distinction between second- versus third-person modes of social cognition has been articulated. Second, we put forward an alternative conceptualization of this distinction—one that gives pride of place to the notion of reciprocity. We discuss the implications of our proposal for neuroscientific studies on social cognition.

[1]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  The role of temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) in global Gestalt perception , 2011, Brain Structure and Function.

[3]  A. Goldman Mirroring, Simulating and Mindreading , 2009 .

[4]  S. Gallagher How the body shapes the mind , 2005 .

[5]  I. Apperly Mindreaders: The Cognitive Basis of "Theory of Mind" , 2010 .

[6]  B Hommel,et al.  The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects , 1996, Psychological research.

[7]  G. Fink,et al.  Eyes on me: an fMRI study of the effects of social gaze on action control. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[8]  Sunny Shin,et al.  Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs ? , 2005 .

[9]  Sarah A. Gerson,et al.  Building intentional action knowledge with one’s hands , 2009 .

[10]  C. Frith,et al.  Rapid Response Subject Collections , 2022 .

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Mesmerising mirror neurons , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  Günther Knoblich,et al.  Spatial perception and control , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  Dorsal and Ventral Stream Interaction: Contributions from Optic Ataxia , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  R. McIntosh,et al.  Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action? , 2010, Cognitive neuroscience.

[16]  Tom Froese,et al.  On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency , 2009, Adapt. Behav..

[17]  H. Wellman,et al.  Infants' ability to connect gaze and emotional expression to intentional action , 2002, Cognition.

[18]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[19]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[21]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[22]  M. Slors,et al.  Early Social Cognition: Alternatives to Implicit Mindreading , 2011, Review of philosophy and psychology.

[23]  A. Newen,et al.  An association account of false belief understanding , 2012, Cognition.

[24]  E. Brenner,et al.  10 years of illusions. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  G. Currie Some ways to understand people , 2008 .

[27]  Shaun Gallagher,et al.  The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction? , 2001 .

[28]  S. Gallagher Logical and Phenomenological Arguments Against Simulation Theory , 2007 .

[29]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[30]  B. Sodian,et al.  Infants' Understanding of Looking, Pointing, and Reaching as Cues to Goal-Directed Action , 2004 .

[31]  M. Boly,et al.  Residual cognitive function in comatose, vegetative and minimally conscious states , 2005, Current opinion in neurology.

[32]  Amanda L. Woodward,et al.  Infants’ developing understanding of the link between looker and object , 2003 .

[33]  J. Cole,et al.  Body image and body schema in a deafferented subject , 1995 .

[34]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm , 2009, Cognition.

[35]  R. Mar The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[36]  L. Fadiga,et al.  Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Modulation of motor and premotor activity during imitation of target-directed actions. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  P. Powers,et al.  Perceptual and cognitive abnormalities in bulimia. , 1987, The American journal of psychiatry.

[39]  M. Wheeler Reconstructing the Cognitive World: The Next Step , 2005 .

[40]  S. Gallagher Direct perception in the intersubjective context , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[41]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Words, thoughts, and theories , 1997 .

[42]  K. Vogeley,et al.  What's in a smile? Neural correlates of facial embodiment during social interaction , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[43]  A. Woodward The infant origins of intentional understanding. , 2005, Advances in child development and behavior.

[44]  M. Iacoboni Neural mechanisms of imitation , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[45]  A. Woodward Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach , 1998, Cognition.

[46]  J. A. Fodor A theory of the child's theory of mind , 1992, Cognition.

[47]  C. Frith,et al.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[48]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Can social interaction constitute social cognition? , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  No double-dissociation between optic ataxia and visual agnosia: Multiple sub-streams for multiple visuo-manual integrations , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  V. Gallese The ‘‘shared manifold’’ hypothesis: from mirror neurons to empathy , 2001 .

[51]  Review of Alva Noë, Action in Perception , 2022 .

[52]  Yasuhiro Kanakogi,et al.  The link between perception and action in early infancy: From the viewpoint of the direct‐matching hypothesis , 2010 .

[53]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: A human fMRI study , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  Hanne De Jaegher Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. , 2009, Consciousness and cognition.

[55]  S. Gallagher Strong interaction and self-agency , 2011 .

[56]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror neuron system. , 2009, Archives of neurology.

[57]  H Bekkering,et al.  Neural and temporal dynamics underlying visual selection for action. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  G. Csibra,et al.  Action Anticipation Through Attribution of False Belief by 2-Year-Olds , 2007, Psychological science.

[59]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception , 1983, Cognition.

[60]  E. Spelke,et al.  Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. , 1995 .

[61]  R. Johansson,et al.  Action plans used in action observation , 2003, Nature.

[62]  H. D. Jaegher,et al.  Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation , 2009 .

[63]  Tania Singer,et al.  The past, present and future of social neuroscience: A European perspective , 2012, NeuroImage.

[64]  A. Milner,et al.  Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[65]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ? , 1985, Cognition.

[66]  M. Goodale,et al.  Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[67]  Amy Coplan Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading by goldman, alvin , 2008 .

[68]  V. Gallese,et al.  What is so special about embodied simulation? , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[69]  S. Stich,et al.  Mindreading: An Integrated Account of Pretence, Self-Awareness, and Understanding Other Minds , 2003 .

[70]  M. Costantini,et al.  Grasping with the eyes. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[71]  F. Gerstenbrand,et al.  Varieties of the locked-in syndrome , 1979, Journal of Neurology.

[72]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[73]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[74]  R. Miall,et al.  A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[75]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[76]  Andreas Roepstorff,et al.  How do illusions constrain goal-directed movement: perceptual and visuomotor influences on speed/accuracy trade-off , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[77]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Infants predict other people's action goals , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[78]  S. Gallagher,et al.  The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science , 2007 .

[79]  Thomas Schenk,et al.  No Dissociation between Perception and Action in Patient DF When Haptic Feedback is Withdrawn , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[80]  V. Reddy How Infants Know Minds , 2008 .

[81]  Shannon Spaulding,et al.  Embodied Cognition and Mindreading , 2010 .

[82]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  A PET Exploration of the Neural Mechanisms Involved in Reciprocal Imitation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[83]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[84]  A. Meltzoff Understanding the Intentions of Others: Re-Enactment of Intended Acts by 18-Month-Old Children. , 1995, Developmental psychology.

[85]  Peter Carruthers,et al.  How we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[86]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[87]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[88]  R. Gardner,et al.  Body image distortion in anorexics as a non-sensory phenomenon: a signal detection approach. , 1988, Journal of clinical psychology.

[89]  Daniel D. Hutto Elementary mind minding, enactivist-style , 2011 .

[90]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[91]  M. Ratcliffe Rethinking Commonsense Psychology: A Critique of Folk Psychology, Theory of Mind and Simulation , 2008 .

[92]  R. Kirk CONVENTION: A PHILOSOPHICAL STUDY , 1970 .

[93]  S. Gallagher Understanding Interpersonal Problems in Autism: Interaction Theory as An Alternative to Theory of Mind , 2004 .

[94]  J. J. Guajardo,et al.  Infants’ understanding of the point gesture as an object-directed action , 2002 .

[95]  Natalie Sebanz,et al.  Beyond simulation? Neural mechanisms for predicting the actions of others , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[96]  P. Hobson,et al.  The Cradle of Thought , 2002 .

[97]  T. Brown,et al.  Body Image in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa , 1987, Behavior modification.

[98]  M. Tomasello,et al.  “This way!”, “No! That way!”—3-year olds know that two people can have mutually incompatible desires , 2007 .

[99]  A. Hough Pride and a Daily Marathon , 1992 .

[100]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Comprehending Prehending: Neural Correlates of Processing Verbs with Motor Stems , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[101]  C. Frith,et al.  Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[102]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Joint action modulates motor system involvement during action observation in 3-year-olds , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[103]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[104]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Exploring the brain basis of joint action: Co-ordination of actions, goals and intentions , 2007, Social neuroscience.

[105]  A. Allport,et al.  Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action , 1987 .

[106]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[107]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[108]  S. Hurley The shared circuits model (SCM): how control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[109]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  False-belief understanding in infants , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[110]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[111]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Both of Us Disgusted in My Insula The Common Neural Basis of Seeing and Feeling Disgust , 2003, Neuron.

[112]  S. Aglioti,et al.  Representing actions through their sound , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[113]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Somatosensation in social perception , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[114]  Lena Kästner,et al.  Dynamic Embodied Cognition , 2012 .

[115]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[116]  H. D. Jaegher,et al.  Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[117]  Sylvia Weir,et al.  Action perception , 1974 .

[118]  A. Meltzoff The 'like me' framework for recognizing and becoming an intentional agent. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[119]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[120]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Neural Representations of Self versus Other: Visual-Spatial Perspective Taking and Agency in a Virtual Ball-tossing Game , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.