Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students
暂无分享,去创建一个
Christina V. Schwarz | Brian J. Reiser | Leema K. Berland | Christina Krist | B. Reiser | Christina Krist | C. Schwarz | Lisa Kenyon | Abraham Lo | Lisa Kenyon | Abraham S. Lo | L. Berland
[1] Daniel C. Edelson. Learning-for-use : A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities , 2001 .
[2] David Hammer,et al. Framing for scientific argumentation , 2012 .
[3] Katherine L. McNeill. Teachers' use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena , 2009 .
[4] B. White,et al. Metamodeling Knowledge: Developing Students' Understanding of Scientific Modeling , 2005 .
[5] William A. Sandoval,et al. High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit , 2003 .
[6] Andrew Elby,et al. Tapping Epistemological Resources for Learning Physics , 2003 .
[7] R. A. Engle,et al. Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .
[8] M. Gertrude Hennessey,et al. Sixth-Grade Students' Epistemologies of Science: The Impact of School Science Experiences on Epistemological Development , 2000 .
[9] Carol Midgley,et al. Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents' psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. , 1996 .
[10] Randy L. Bell,et al. Just do it? impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry , 2003 .
[11] Daniel L. Schwartz,et al. Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning , 1998 .
[12] Cynthia Passmore,et al. Exploring Opportunities for Argumentation in Modelling Classrooms , 2012 .
[13] Leema K. Berland,et al. Explaining Variation in How Classroom Communities Adapt the Practice of Scientific Argumentation , 2011 .
[14] M. Neubrand. Remarks on the Acceptance of Proofs: The Case of Some Recently Tackled Major Theorems. , 1989 .
[15] Michael Ford,et al. ‘Grasp of Practice’ as a Reasoning Resource for Inquiry and Nature of Science Understanding , 2008 .
[16] David Fortus,et al. School, Teacher, Peers, and Parents' Goals Emphases and Adolescents' Motivation to Learn Science in and out of School. , 2013 .
[17] N. Songer,et al. Guiding Explanation Construction by Children at the Entry Points of Learning Progressions. , 2012 .
[18] Edna Tan,et al. Creating Hybrid Spaces for Engaging School Science Among Urban Middle School Girls , 2008 .
[19] Jessica Thompson,et al. Beyond the scientific method: Model‐based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations , 2008 .
[20] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Scientific Explanations: Characterizing and Evaluating the Effects of Teachers' Instructional Practices on Student Learning. , 2008 .
[21] G. Aikenhead,et al. Toward a First Nations Cross-Cultural Science and Technology Curriculum. , 1997 .
[22] Angela Calabrese Barton,et al. Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space , 2009 .
[23] R. Duschl,et al. "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .
[24] David E. Kanter,et al. Doing the project and learning the content: Designing project-based science curricula for meaningful understanding† , 2009 .
[25] W. Sandoval. Understanding Students' Practical Epistemologies and Their Influence on Learning Through Inquiry , 2005 .
[26] Wendy Morgan,et al. A Dialogic Approach to Argumentation: Using a Chat Room To Develop Early Adolescent Students' Argumentative Writing. , 2003 .
[27] Amy Bruckman,et al. Writing, Citing, and Participatory Media: Wikis as Learning Environments in the High School Classroom , 2009 .
[28] David Fortus,et al. Adolescents' Declining Motivation to Learn Science: Inevitable or Not? , 2011 .
[29] Leema K. Berland,et al. Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .
[30] S. Erduran,et al. Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge , 2008 .
[31] Carole A. Ames. Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .
[32] B. Reiser,et al. Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners , 2009 .
[33] Shirley Simon,et al. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .
[34] Susan Carey,et al. On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge , 1993 .
[35] Brian J. Reiser,et al. Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
[36] Eve Manz,et al. Representing Student Argumentation as Functionally Emergent From Scientific Activity , 2015 .
[37] Leslie R. Herrenkohl,et al. Participant Structures, Scientific Discourse, and Student Engagement in Fourth Grade , 1998 .
[38] Eve Manz,et al. Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge , 2012 .
[39] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Enacting Reform-Based Science Materials: The Range of Teacher Enactments in Reform Classrooms , 2005 .
[40] Joseph Petraglia,et al. Spinning like a Kite: A Closer Look at the Pseudotransactional Function of Writing. , 1995 .
[41] C. Ballenger,et al. Social Identities, Moral Narratives, Scientific Argumentation: Science Talk in a Bilingual Classroom. , 1997 .
[42] Victor Sampson,et al. Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study , 2011 .
[43] D. Klahr,et al. All other things being equal: acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. , 1999, Child development.
[44] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Synergy Between Teacher Practices and Curricular Scaffolds to Support Students in Using Domain-Specific and Domain-General Knowledge in Writing Arguments to Explain Phenomena , 2009 .
[45] W. Sandoval,et al. Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .
[46] C. Chinn,et al. Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .
[47] Carol L. Smith,et al. Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .
[48] D. Kuhn,et al. What Needs to Develop in the Development of Inquiry Skills? , 2008 .
[49] Jonathan Osborne,et al. The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: a case study of a teacher's attempts to teach science based on argument , 2014 .
[50] R. Duschl. Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals , 2008 .
[51] Douglas L. Medin,et al. Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies , 2010 .
[52] Kathleen Hogan,et al. Viewing Classrooms as Cultural Contexts for Fostering Scientific Literacy , 2001 .
[53] Jennifer Archer,et al. Achievement Goals as a Measure of Motivation in University Students , 1994 .
[54] Jonathan Osborne,et al. Teaching Scientific Practices: Meeting the Challenge of Change , 2014 .
[55] Ravit Golan Duncan,et al. Learners' Epistemic Criteria for Good Scientific Models. , 2011 .
[56] Loucas T. Louca,et al. Epistemological Resources: Applying a New Epistemological Framework to Science Instruction , 2004 .
[57] Leslie R. Herrenkohl,et al. Power in the Classroom: How the Classroom Environment Shapes Students' Relationships With Each Other and With Concepts , 2004 .
[58] Katherine L. McNeill,et al. Urban High School Students’ Critical Science Agency: Conceptual Understandings and Environmental Actions Around Climate Change , 2012 .
[59] Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al. Developing Scientific Communities in Classrooms: A Sociocognitive Approach , 1999 .
[60] David Fortus,et al. Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: A follow-up study , 2012 .
[61] Philip Bell,et al. “What comes to mind when you think of science? The perfumery!”: Documenting science-related cultural learning pathways across contexts and timescales , 2014 .
[62] M. Windschitl,et al. Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education , 2011 .
[63] Luke A. Buckland,et al. Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology , 2011 .
[64] Janet L. Kolodner,et al. Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .
[65] William A. Sandoval,et al. Science Education's Need for a Theory of Epistemological Development , 2014 .
[66] David Hammer,et al. Attending to student epistemological framing in a science classroom , 2010 .
[67] Judith A. Langer,et al. Reading and Writing Instruction: Toward a Theory of Teaching and Learning , 1986 .
[68] Ann S. Rosebery,et al. Appropriating Scientific Discourse: Findings from Language Minority Classrooms. , 1992 .
[69] Cory Travers Lewis,et al. The generality of scientific models: a measure theoretic approach , 2014, Synthese.
[70] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials , 2006 .
[71] Jere Brophy,et al. Developing Students' Appreciation for What Is Taught in School , 2008 .
[72] Michael J. Ford,et al. A Dialogic Account of Sense-Making in Scientific Argumentation and Reasoning , 2012 .
[73] Mitchel Resnick,et al. “Thick” authenticity: new media and authentic learning , 1999 .
[74] Mary Ratcliffe,et al. What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community , 2003 .
[75] David F. Treagust,et al. Inquiry in science education: International perspectives , 2004 .
[76] D. Medin,et al. Desettling Expectations in Science Education , 2013, Human Development.
[77] Edna Tan,et al. We Be Burnin'! Agency, Identity, and Science Learning , 2010 .
[78] Ann Rosebery,et al. Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense‐making , 2001 .
[79] Katherine L. McNeill,et al. Learning‐goals‐driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project‐based pedagogy , 2008 .
[80] Katherine L. McNeill,et al. Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation , 2009 .
[81] Rosemary S. Russ,et al. Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science , 2008 .
[82] Michael J. Ford,et al. Chapter 1: Redefining Disciplinary Learning in Classroom Contexts , 2006 .
[83] Rosemary S. Russ. Epistemology of Science vs. Epistemology for Science , 2014 .
[84] J. Eccles,et al. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.
[85] S. Erduran,et al. TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .
[86] Katerine Bielaczyc,et al. Informing Design Research: Learning From Teachers' Designs of Social Infrastructure , 2013 .
[87] Brian J. Reiser,et al. Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation , 2011 .
[88] Manu Kapur,et al. Designing for Productive Failure , 2012 .
[89] Michael E. Beeth,et al. Learning Goals in an Exemplary Science Teacher's Practice: Cognitive and Social Factors in Teaching for Conceptual Change. , 1999 .
[90] Carol D. Lee. ‘Every good‐bye ain’t gone’: analyzing the cultural underpinnings of classroom talk , 2006 .