Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students

Recent research and policy documents call for engaging students and teachers in scientific practices such that the goal of science education shifts from students knowing scientific and epistemic ideas, to students developing and using these understandings as tools to make sense of the world. This perspective pushes students to move beyond the rote performance of scientific actions or processes and engage instead in purposeful knowledge construction work. This raises parallel questions about how to go beyond characterizing student performance of scientific process to understand their engagement in scientific practices as a goal-directed activity. To that end, this article offers a framework—the Epistemologies in Practice (EIP) framework—for characterizing how students can engage meaningfully in scientific practices. This framework emphasizes two aspects of student engagement in scientific practices: (1) the students' epistemic goals for their knowledge construction work and (2) their epistemic understandings of how to engage in that work. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 53:1082–1112, 2016

[1]  Daniel C. Edelson.  Learning-for-use : A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities , 2001 .

[2]  David Hammer,et al.  Framing for scientific argumentation , 2012 .

[3]  Katherine L. McNeill.  Teachers' use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena , 2009 .

[4]  B. White,et al.  Metamodeling Knowledge: Developing Students' Understanding of Scientific Modeling , 2005 .

[5]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit , 2003 .

[6]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Tapping Epistemological Resources for Learning Physics , 2003 .

[7]  R. A. Engle,et al.  Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .

[8]  M. Gertrude Hennessey,et al.  Sixth-Grade Students' Epistemologies of Science: The Impact of School Science Experiences on Epistemological Development , 2000 .

[9]  Carol Midgley,et al.  Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents' psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. , 1996 .

[10]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Just do it? impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry , 2003 .

[11]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning , 1998 .

[12]  Cynthia Passmore,et al.  Exploring Opportunities for Argumentation in Modelling Classrooms , 2012 .

[13]  Leema K. Berland,et al.  Explaining Variation in How Classroom Communities Adapt the Practice of Scientific Argumentation , 2011 .

[14]  M. Neubrand.  Remarks on the Acceptance of Proofs: The Case of Some Recently Tackled Major Theorems. , 1989 .

[15]  Michael Ford,et al.  ‘Grasp of Practice’ as a Reasoning Resource for Inquiry and Nature of Science Understanding , 2008 .

[16]  David Fortus,et al.  School, Teacher, Peers, and Parents' Goals Emphases and Adolescents' Motivation to Learn Science in and out of School. , 2013 .

[17]  N. Songer,et al.  Guiding Explanation Construction by Children at the Entry Points of Learning Progressions. , 2012 .

[18]  Edna Tan,et al.  Creating Hybrid Spaces for Engaging School Science Among Urban Middle School Girls , 2008 .

[19]  Jessica Thompson,et al.  Beyond the scientific method: Model‐based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations , 2008 .

[20]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Scientific Explanations: Characterizing and Evaluating the Effects of Teachers' Instructional Practices on Student Learning. , 2008 .

[21]  G. Aikenhead,et al.  Toward a First Nations Cross-Cultural Science and Technology Curriculum. , 1997 .

[22]  Angela Calabrese Barton,et al.  Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space , 2009 .

[23]  R. Duschl,et al.  "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .

[24]  David E. Kanter,et al.  Doing the project and learning the content: Designing project-based science curricula for meaningful understanding† , 2009 .

[25]  W. Sandoval.  Understanding Students' Practical Epistemologies and Their Influence on Learning Through Inquiry , 2005 .

[26]  Wendy Morgan,et al.  A Dialogic Approach to Argumentation: Using a Chat Room To Develop Early Adolescent Students' Argumentative Writing. , 2003 .

[27]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Writing, Citing, and Participatory Media: Wikis as Learning Environments in the High School Classroom , 2009 .

[28]  David Fortus,et al.  Adolescents' Declining Motivation to Learn Science: Inevitable or Not? , 2011 .

[29]  Leema K. Berland,et al.  Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .

[30]  S. Erduran,et al.  Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge , 2008 .

[31]  Carole A. Ames.  Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[32]  B. Reiser,et al.  Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners , 2009 .

[33]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .

[34]  Susan Carey,et al.  On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge , 1993 .

[35]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[36]  Eve Manz,et al.  Representing Student Argumentation as Functionally Emergent From Scientific Activity , 2015 .

[37]  Leslie R. Herrenkohl,et al.  Participant Structures, Scientific Discourse, and Student Engagement in Fourth Grade , 1998 .

[38]  Eve Manz,et al.  Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge , 2012 .

[39]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Enacting Reform-Based Science Materials: The Range of Teacher Enactments in Reform Classrooms , 2005 .

[40]  Joseph Petraglia,et al.  Spinning like a Kite: A Closer Look at the Pseudotransactional Function of Writing. , 1995 .

[41]  C. Ballenger,et al.  Social Identities, Moral Narratives, Scientific Argumentation: Science Talk in a Bilingual Classroom. , 1997 .

[42]  Victor Sampson,et al.  Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study , 2011 .

[43]  D. Klahr,et al.  All other things being equal: acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. , 1999, Child development.

[44]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Synergy Between Teacher Practices and Curricular Scaffolds to Support Students in Using Domain-Specific and Domain-General Knowledge in Writing Arguments to Explain Phenomena , 2009 .

[45]  W. Sandoval,et al.  Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .

[46]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[47]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .

[48]  D. Kuhn,et al.  What Needs to Develop in the Development of Inquiry Skills? , 2008 .

[49]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  The science classroom as a site of epistemic talk: a case study of a teacher's attempts to teach science based on argument , 2014 .

[50]  R. Duschl.  Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals , 2008 .

[51]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies , 2010 .

[52]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Viewing Classrooms as Cultural Contexts for Fostering Scientific Literacy , 2001 .

[53]  Jennifer Archer,et al.  Achievement Goals as a Measure of Motivation in University Students , 1994 .

[54]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Teaching Scientific Practices: Meeting the Challenge of Change , 2014 .

[55]  Ravit Golan Duncan,et al.  Learners' Epistemic Criteria for Good Scientific Models. , 2011 .

[56]  Loucas T. Louca,et al.  Epistemological Resources: Applying a New Epistemological Framework to Science Instruction , 2004 .

[57]  Leslie R. Herrenkohl,et al.  Power in the Classroom: How the Classroom Environment Shapes Students' Relationships With Each Other and With Concepts , 2004 .

[58]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  Urban High School Students’ Critical Science Agency: Conceptual Understandings and Environmental Actions Around Climate Change , 2012 .

[59]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Developing Scientific Communities in Classrooms: A Sociocognitive Approach , 1999 .

[60]  David Fortus,et al.  Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: A follow-up study , 2012 .

[61]  Philip Bell,et al.  “What comes to mind when you think of science? The perfumery!”: Documenting science-related cultural learning pathways across contexts and timescales , 2014 .

[62]  M. Windschitl,et al.  Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education , 2011 .

[63]  Luke A. Buckland,et al.  Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology , 2011 .

[64]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .

[65]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  Science Education's Need for a Theory of Epistemological Development , 2014 .

[66]  David Hammer,et al.  Attending to student epistemological framing in a science classroom , 2010 .

[67]  Judith A. Langer,et al.  Reading and Writing Instruction: Toward a Theory of Teaching and Learning , 1986 .

[68]  Ann S. Rosebery,et al.  Appropriating Scientific Discourse: Findings from Language Minority Classrooms. , 1992 .

[69]  Cory Travers Lewis,et al.  The generality of scientific models: a measure theoretic approach , 2014, Synthese.

[70]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials , 2006 .

[71]  Jere Brophy,et al.  Developing Students' Appreciation for What Is Taught in School , 2008 .

[72]  Michael J. Ford,et al.  A Dialogic Account of Sense-Making in Scientific Argumentation and Reasoning , 2012 .

[73]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  “Thick” authenticity: new media and authentic learning , 1999 .

[74]  Mary Ratcliffe,et al.  What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community , 2003 .

[75]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Inquiry in science education: International perspectives , 2004 .

[76]  D. Medin,et al.  Desettling Expectations in Science Education , 2013, Human Development.

[77]  Edna Tan,et al.  We Be Burnin'! Agency, Identity, and Science Learning , 2010 .

[78]  Ann Rosebery,et al.  Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense‐making , 2001 .

[79]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  Learning‐goals‐driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project‐based pedagogy , 2008 .

[80]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation , 2009 .

[81]  Rosemary S. Russ,et al.  Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science , 2008 .

[82]  Michael J. Ford,et al.  Chapter 1: Redefining Disciplinary Learning in Classroom Contexts , 2006 .

[83]  Rosemary S. Russ.  Epistemology of Science vs. Epistemology for Science , 2014 .

[84]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[85]  S. Erduran,et al.  TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .

[86]  Katerine Bielaczyc,et al.  Informing Design Research: Learning From Teachers' Designs of Social Infrastructure , 2013 .

[87]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation , 2011 .

[88]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Designing for Productive Failure , 2012 .

[89]  Michael E. Beeth,et al.  Learning Goals in an Exemplary Science Teacher's Practice: Cognitive and Social Factors in Teaching for Conceptual Change. , 1999 .

[90]  Carol D. Lee.  ‘Every good‐bye ain’t gone’: analyzing the cultural underpinnings of classroom talk , 2006 .