Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy

[1]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  J. Jonides.  Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[4]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[5]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[6]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[8]  J. Theeuwes.  Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Stryker,et al.  Development of orientation selectivity in ferret visual cortex and effects of deprivation , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  H. Nothdurft.  Saliency effects across dimensions in visual search , 1993, Vision Research.

[12]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of popout: II. Role of position , 1996 .

[16]  H. Müller,et al.  Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[19]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[22]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  A. Hillstrom.  Repetition effects in visual search , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Anderson,et al.  Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events , 2001, Nature.

[26]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  An instance theory of attention and memory. , 2002, Psychological review.

[27]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  P. Dayan,et al.  Reward, Motivation, and Reinforcement Learning , 2002, Neuron.

[30]  I..  THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .

[31]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  The role of priming in conjunctive visual search , 2002, Cognition.

[32]  Okihide Hikosaka,et al.  Reward-Dependent Gain and Bias of Visual Responses in Primate Superior Colliculus , 2003, Neuron.

[33]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  P. Glimcher,et al.  Activity in Posterior Parietal Cortex Is Correlated with the Relative Subjective Desirability of Action , 2004, Neuron.

[35]  W. Newsome,et al.  Matching Behavior and the Representation of Value in the Parietal Cortex , 2004, Science.

[36]  J. Maunsell.  Neuronal representations of cognitive state: reward or attention? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Look at me, I'm smiling: Visual search for threatening and nonthreatening facial expressions , 2005 .

[38]  Arni Kristjansson,et al.  Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Edward Awh,et al.  Resolving visual interference during covert spatial orienting: online attentional control through static records of prior visual experience. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Monetary incentives enhance processing in brain regions mediating top-down control of attention. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming , 2006 .

[43]  M. Bear,et al.  Reward Timing in the Primary Visual Cortex , 2006, Science.

[44]  Fang Fang,et al.  A gender- and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Visual Selective Attention and the Effects of Monetary Rewards , 2006, Psychological science.

[46]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Saccades, salience and attention: the role of the lateral intraparietal area in visual behavior. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[47]  E. Van der Burg,et al.  The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Top–Down Attentional Deficits in Macaques with Lesions of Lateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  G. Boynton,et al.  Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation , 2007, Neuron.

[50]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Involuntary Attentional Capture is Determined by Task Set: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons , 2008, Vision Research.

[52]  Bruce Milliken,et al.  Context-specific learning and control: The roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[53]  Carly J. Leonard,et al.  Attentional guidance in singleton search: An examination of top-down, bottom-up, and intertrial factors , 2008 .

[54]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Learning to Attend and to Ignore Is a Matter of Gains and Losses , 2009, Psychological science.

[55]  S. Luck,et al.  Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  J. Raymond,et al.  Selective Visual Attention and Motivation , 2009, Psychological science.

[57]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reward Priority of Visual Target Singletons Modulates Event-Related Potential Signatures of Attentional Selection , 2009, Psychological science.

[58]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Rewards Evoke Learning of Unconsciously Processed Visual Stimuli in Adult Humans , 2009, Neuron.

[59]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The limits of top-down control of visual attention. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[60]  H. Müller,et al.  Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  Christopher J. Peck,et al.  Reward Modulates Attention Independently of Action Value in Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  G. Campana,et al.  Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[63]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Reward Guides Vision when It's Your Thing: Trait Reward-Seeking in Reward-Mediated Visual Priming , 2010, PloS one.

[64]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Embedding Reward Signals into Perception and Cognition , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[65]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[66]  Edward Awh,et al.  Statistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[68]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate , 2022 .

[69]  Brian A Anderson,et al.  Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing a two-process model , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[70]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  What is top-down about contingent capture? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[71]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Priming of pop-out modulates attentional target selection in visual search: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence , 2010, Vision Research.

[72]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Optimal reward harvesting in complex perceptual environments , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  Jon Driver,et al.  Fortune and reversals of fortune in visual search: Reward contingencies for pop-out targets affect search efficiency and target repetition effects , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[74]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  On the limits of top-down control of visual selection , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[75]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces. , 2011, Emotion.

[76]  P. Glimcher,et al.  Reward Value-Based Gain Control: Divisive Normalization in Parietal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[77]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Situating visual search , 2011, Vision Research.

[78]  J. Bisley.  The neural basis of visual attention , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[79]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Learned Value Magnifies Salience-Based Attentional Capture , 2011, PloS one.

[80]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[81]  Steven B. Most,et al.  Dissociating Spatial Attention and Awareness in Emotion-Induced Blindness , 2011, Psychological science.

[82]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Deciding where to attend: priming of pop-out drives target selection. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.