Force Tracking in Impedance Control

This article presents two simple on-line schemes for force tracking within the impedance-control framework. The force- tracking capability of impedance control is particularly important for providing robustness in the presence of large uncertainties or variations in environmental parameters. The two proposed schemes generate the reference position trajec tory required to produce a desired contact force despite lack of knowledge of the environmental stiffness and location. The first scheme uses direct adaptive control to generate the refer ence position on-line as a function of the force-tracking error. Alternatively, the second scheme utilizes an indirect adaptive strategy in which the environmental parameters are estimated on-line, and the required reference position is computed based on these estimates. In both schemes, adaptation allows au tomatic gain adjustment to provide a uniform performance despite variations in the environmental parameters. Simula tion studies are presented for a 7-DOF Robotics Research arm using full arm dynamics, demonstrating that the adaptive schemes are able to compensate for uncertainties in both the environmental stiffness and location. The simulation studies also highlight the limitations of pure impedance control without the force-tracking capability for robust execution of realistic contact tasks. Experimental results are also presented for the Robotics Research arm to demonstrate that the end effector applies the desired contact force while exhibiting the specified impedance dynamics.

[1]  W. Bolton Motion and force , 1980 .

[2]  Matthew T. Mason,et al.  Compliance and Force Control for Computer Controlled Manipulators , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Stable compliance control and its implementation for a 6 DOF manipulator , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Homayoun Seraji,et al.  Decentralized adaptive control of manipulators , 1994, J. Field Robotics.

[5]  Anuradha M. Annaswamy,et al.  Stable Adaptive Systems , 1989 .

[6]  Neville Hogan,et al.  On the stability of manipulators performing contact tasks , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[7]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[8]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Motion and force control of robot manipulators , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Louis J. Everett,et al.  Robust Impedance Control of Robot Manipulators , 1991 .

[10]  N. Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control:An Approach to Manipulation,Parts I,II,III , 1985 .

[11]  Paul Backes,et al.  The modular telerobot task execution system for space telerobotics , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Robust compliant motion for manipulators, part I: The fundamental concepts of compliant motion , 1986, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[13]  Ty A. Lasky,et al.  On force-tracking impedance control of robot manipulators , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Richard Alan Volpe,et al.  Real and Artificial Forces in the Control of Manipulators: Theory and Experiments , 1990 .

[15]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Adaptive Control of Mechanical Manipulators , 1987, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Dale Lawrence,et al.  Position-based impedance control - Achieving stability in practice , 1987 .

[17]  John J. Craig,et al.  Hybrid position/force control of manipulators , 1981 .

[18]  Laeeque Daneshmend,et al.  An adaptive compliant motion controller for robot manipulators based on damping control , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.